W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

04 Mar 2014

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
AWK, Joshue, Kathleen, Loretta, +1.703.825.aaaa, Sailesh, Michael_Cooper, Jon_avila, Marc_Johlic, +1.781.690.aabb, Tom_Hoffman, James_Nurthen
Regrets
Alan, Wilco, Kathy, DavidMacD, Barry, Kerstin, Bruce, Alastair
Chair
AWK
Scribe
Kathleen

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 04 March 2014

<AWK> Zakim agenda?

<Joshue108> trackbot, start meeting

<trackbot> Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

<trackbot> Date: 04 March 2014

<Joshue108> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140225/

<Joshue108> Chair: AWK

<AWK> brb

<AWK> back

<Jon_avila> the Ip caller is probably me Jon Avila

<AWK> Scribe: Kathleen

Updating the scribe list

<AWK> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List

<Joshue108> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Scribe_List

AWK: updating scribe list
... let Josh and I manage the scribe list

Close out final comment https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/aria10f65/results

AWK: final comment response to EO re: their comment on aria1065
... click link for response

AW: any comments, questions, concerns?

AWK: any objections to accepting this as proposed?

<Joshue108> RESOLUTION: Accepted as proposed

AWK: accepted as proposed

Incorrect JAWS keystroke comment https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/35422/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20140107/2898

<AWK> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/H80.html

AWK: the comment is that the keystroke in the technique is not helpful

<Joshue108> +q

AWK: we have found this keystoke to work and David confirmed it
... user agent support is definitely a factor for a technique like this one

<Joshue108> Kath: There should be 'there are'..

<Joshue108> Kath: Some grammar.

AWK: any objection to acceptnig this as amended?
... accepted as amended

RESOLUTION: accepted as amended

Responding to unaddressed comments

AWK: we have a number of comments we have not responded to
... 15 comments, 13 are from wilco
... proposing an email response

<AWK> Proposed response: Thank you for your comments on the Techniques for WCAG 2.0 document. This email is to notify you that your comments have been received by the Working Group and they will be addressed, but since the comments are not specific to new content in the techniques document they have been deferred until the next publication of the document in order to meet the publication deadline.

<AWK> And more... We will notify you again once we have reviewed your comments as a group and de

<AWK> and determined whether to make changes to the Techniques document as a result or provide clarification.

<Joshue108> looks fine to me

looks OK to me

<marcjohlic> +1

<Jon_avila> +1

<Loretta> +1

AWK: responses are sent out through the comment tracker system
... any objections to sending out this response to the unaddressed comments?

RESOLUTION: chair to notify commenters of unaddressed comments about status

Misc survey for February 25th, 2014 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20140225/results

LC-2880: This technique should be a failure technique

AWK: this one is from wilco
... he feels there are some issue with this
... survey comments are mixed

<Joshue108> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H2

sailesh: if this is not fixing something then why is there a technique?

<Joshue108> 2.4.3 is meaningful sequence

<Joshue108> +q

Loretta: leave it open and add it to the list of techniques we need to work on?

<Loretta> I suggest just sending the previously approved status message.

<Loretta> message

AWK: we are going to leave it open and add it to our list of comments that need to be addessed
... any objections?

RESOLUTION: leave open

LC-2882: Add a warning about the poor support for this technique h69

<Joshue108> +q

<Joshue108> -q

AWK: any new questions or comments?
... any objections to accepting this as amended?

RESOLUION: accepted as amended

RESOLUTION: accepted as amended

Git Pull request 8: Additional example for ARIA9

AWK: any other comments about this one?

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/8

AWK: the commented will submit another example
... any objections to closing as already resolved?

RESOLUTION: close because of .....

<AWK> RESOLUTION: Closed as already resolved (rejected pull request)

LC-2895: Add "Techniques for Specific Technologies"

AWK: need to work on this with the EO WG
... any ideas or thoughts on this?

<Joshue108> +q

Joshue108: the term that throws me is "accessible to all people"

<Jon_avila> +1 to Joshue's comment.

<Joshue108> +q

Loretta: invite Shawn to one of our meetings?

RESOLUTION: we will leave this open and discuss this with EOWG at a meeting

CSUN - WCAG F2F Agenda http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/03/ftf-meeting

<AWK> Currently: 10 attendees (Michael Cooper, Kathy Wahlbin, Katie Haritos-Shea, Michael Elledge, Loretta Guarino Reid, Andrew Kirkpatrick, Josh O Connor, James Nurthen, Tim Boland, Lisa Seeman)

<AWK> Register - https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/201403_ftf/

AWK: if you don't see your name here you should go and register

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2014/03/ftf-meeting#agenda

AWK: any questions about the draft agenda

marcjohlic: remote availability?

AWK: I believe Yes

MichaelC: we can set up a reservation on the bridge
... don't know if we will have a phone in the room

Assigning comment responses https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Comments_Needing_Responses

<Joshue108> Kath: Whats the timeframe?

AWK: need responses by June

<Jon_avila> I'll take it.

I'll take it

https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Comments_Needing_Responses

<Jon_avila> 2903

AWK: click on the technique link, there is status "open and assigned to"
... type your poposed comment in the Resolution: text box
... say what you're going to change

change the status to proposal and submit as proposal

Publication status

AWK: we are looking at thursday for the techniques and understanding documents for publication

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2014-03-04 17:37:17 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/previuosly/previously/
Succeeded: s/messae/message/
Succeeded: s/(rejected)/(rejected pull request)/
Found Scribe: Kathleen
Inferring ScribeNick: kathleen
Default Present: AWK, Joshue, Kathleen, Loretta, +1.703.825.aaaa, Sailesh, Michael_Cooper, Jon_avila, Marc_Johlic, +1.781.690.aabb, Tom_Hoffman
Present: AWK Joshue Kathleen Loretta +1.703.825.aaaa Sailesh Michael_Cooper Jon_avila Marc_Johlic +1.781.690.aabb Tom_Hoffman James_Nurthen
Regrets: Alan Wilco Kathy DavidMacD Barry Kerstin Bruce Alastair
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2014JanMar/0167.html
Found Date: 04 Mar 2014
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/03/04-wai-wcag-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]