See also: IRC log
Silvia: they have divied the work between Silvia and Justin. The draft will be produced during March.
Shadi: Still porgressing, nothing new to report. Focusing more in updating the webpage of the symposium.
Shadi: follow up in two weeks.
Shadi: Already some changes have been done.
Shadi: any thoughts about easy to read?
... The draft still needs a lot of editorial work.
... Also grammar issues.
Vivienne: it is difficult to know to review it.
Simon: In the top right one casn see how to answer it.
Vivienne: only 8 have responded. Pretty positive
answer in general.
... Still some typos, grammatical errors, and language problems.
<sharper> ACTION-56: Now moving to update the catalogue item based on the survey data.
<trackbot> Notes added to ACTION-56 Revisit Accreditation Survey Results.
Simon: Let's make the changes based on what we have. We cannot wait for everyone to answer.
Vivienne: I will incorporate the changes.
<Justin> will I?
Shadi: Special focus on: How acreditation is
... There are other types of acreaditation. We need to make sure we only speak about one kind of acreditation.
... The definition is acredation websites= evaluation of websites.
Simon: The group has decided that we want to be more brief than expansive.
Shadi: What kind of background?
Simon: The (more) refenreces need to support the
... short background (in text) but more references in other to support the background, to provide an expansive basis.
Shadi: Adding more references don't make the background longer, so no contradiction with the clarity that the group pursuited.
Simon: remeber to fill the Accessibility Accreditation DRAFT by tonight.
Simon and Shadi: Check item 52 from the topic catalogue.
Simon: changes for the acreditaion can be directly done in the wiki.
<shadi> +1 to making changes directly into the wiki
Shadi: We dont need contact piece in the catalogue entry.