13:46:53 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-irc ←
13:47:17 <manu> manu has changed the topic to: RDFa WG telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0088.html (manu)
Manu Sporny: manu has changed the topic to: RDFa WG telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0088.html (manu) ←
13:47:26 <manu> trackbot, prepare telecon
Manu Sporny: trackbot, prepare telecon ←
13:47:28 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:47:30 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 7332 ←
13:47:30 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 13 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 13 minutes ←
13:47:31 <trackbot> Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference
13:47:31 <trackbot> Date: 20 May 2010
13:47:41 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0088.html
13:47:44 <manu> Chair: Manu
13:47:53 <manu> Present: Ivan, Manu, MarkB, BenjaminA, Steven, Knud, Toby
13:48:15 <manu> Regrets: BenA, ShaneM
13:59:34 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started
(No events recorded for 12 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started ←
13:59:41 <Zakim> + +03539149aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +03539149aaaa ←
13:59:55 <Zakim> +[MIT528]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[MIT528] ←
14:00:18 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:27 <manu> zakim, I am IPcaller
Manu Sporny: zakim, I am IPcaller ←
14:00:27 <Zakim> ok, manu, I now associate you with [IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, manu, I now associate you with [IPcaller] ←
14:00:54 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip ←
14:00:54 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made ←
14:00:56 <Zakim> +Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan ←
14:01:24 <Zakim> + +49.631.205.7.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +49.631.205.7.aabb ←
14:01:28 <manu> zakim, ?aaaa is Knud
Manu Sporny: zakim, ?aaaa is Knud ←
14:01:28 <Zakim> sorry, manu, I do not recognize a party named '?aaaa'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, manu, I do not recognize a party named '?aaaa' ←
14:01:42 <manu> zakim, aaaa is Knud
Manu Sporny: zakim, aaaa is Knud ←
14:01:42 <Zakim> +Knud; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Knud; got it ←
14:01:52 <Zakim> +tinkster
Zakim IRC Bot: +tinkster ←
14:01:52 <manu> zakim, aabb is BenjaminA
Manu Sporny: zakim, aabb is BenjaminA ←
14:02:02 <Zakim> +BenjaminA; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BenjaminA; got it ←
14:04:04 <manu> zakim, who is on the call?
Manu Sporny: zakim, who is on the call? ←
14:04:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster ←
14:04:38 <tinkster> zakim, who's on the phone?
Toby Inkster: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:04:39 <Zakim> On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster ←
14:04:50 <tinkster> zakim, mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, mute me ←
14:04:50 <Zakim> tinkster should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should now be muted ←
14:06:01 <markbirbeck> zakim, code?
Mark Birbeck: zakim, code? ←
14:06:01 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), markbirbeck ←
14:06:32 <Zakim> + +0208761aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: + +0208761aacc ←
14:06:32 <Benjamin> scribenick: Benjamin
(Scribe set to Benjamin Adrian)
14:06:41 <markbirbeck> zakim, i am ?aacc
Mark Birbeck: zakim, i am ?aacc ←
14:06:41 <Zakim> sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named '?aacc'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, markbirbeck, I do not see a party named '?aacc' ←
14:06:53 <manu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0088.html
Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010May/0088.html ←
14:06:59 <markbirbeck> zakim, i am aacc
Mark Birbeck: zakim, i am aacc ←
14:06:59 <Zakim> +markbirbeck; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +markbirbeck; got it ←
14:08:11 <Benjamin> ivan: let's discuss ISSUE-6 with Shane
Ivan Herman: let's discuss ISSUE-6 with Shane ←
14:10:20 <Benjamin> Topic: RDFa DOM API Status Update
14:10:27 <Benjamin> manu: Mark and Manu discussed issues on integrating both RDFa DOM API proposals
Manu Sporny: Mark and Manu discussed issues on integrating both RDFa DOM API proposals ←
14:10:49 <Benjamin> ... Benjamin is ok with the changes.
... Benjamin is ok with the changes. ←
14:11:13 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-dom-api/
Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-dom-api/ ←
14:11:25 <Benjamin> markbirbeck: Excellent work manu!
Mark Birbeck: Excellent work manu! ←
14:11:42 <Benjamin> manu: changes are highlighted on the mailing list
Manu Sporny: changes are highlighted on the mailing list ←
14:12:32 <Benjamin> ... what we had was a low level API covering RDF types and some basic methods for retrieving triples
... what we had was a low level API covering RDF types and some basic methods for retrieving triples ←
14:13:27 <Benjamin> ... Mark had many ideas to improve that and proposed to use this API even for other language formats (microformats, vcard, ...) than RDFa.
... Mark had many ideas to improve that and proposed to use this API even for other language formats (microformats, vcard, ...) than RDFa. ←
14:14:19 <Benjamin> ... added concepts of parser and store into the API and wrote about how to initialize the API
... added concepts of parser and store into the API and wrote about how to initialize the API ←
14:15:05 <Benjamin> ... We agreed on a much more gentle introduction of the document
... We agreed on a much more gentle introduction of the document ←
14:15:38 <Benjamin> ... Is this the right direction?
... Is this the right direction? ←
14:16:29 <Benjamin> ivan: wrote my oppinion in the mailing list.
Ivan Herman: wrote my oppinion in the mailing list. ←
14:17:02 <Benjamin> ... Finally, we should split parts of the document into several documents
... Finally, we should split parts of the document into several documents ←
14:17:47 <Benjamin> ... It's hard to understand the document because of the different levels that are mentioned.
... It's hard to understand the document because of the different levels that are mentioned. ←
14:18:31 <Benjamin> ... Ordinary users may be confused by too technical parts (e.g., store, parsers)
... Ordinary users may be confused by too technical parts (e.g., store, parsers) ←
14:19:50 <Benjamin> ... in an Appendix a clean IDL specification of the API should exist
... in an Appendix a clean IDL specification of the API should exist ←
14:20:58 <Benjamin> ... The examples do not specify enough what is happening underneath
... The examples do not specify enough what is happening underneath ←
14:22:35 <Benjamin> manu: We plan to have implementation details in section 3 and 4.
Manu Sporny: We plan to have implementation details in section 3 and 4. ←
14:22:45 <manu> zakim, q?
Manu Sporny: zakim, q? ←
14:22:45 <Zakim> I see no one on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see no one on the speaker queue ←
14:22:58 <markbirbeck> q+
Mark Birbeck: q+ ←
14:23:17 <Benjamin> ivan: The document should be edited more as manual or reference guide.
Ivan Herman: The document should be edited more as manual or reference guide. ←
14:24:06 <Benjamin> q+
q+ ←
14:24:11 <manu> ack markbirbeck
Manu Sporny: ack markbirbeck ←
14:25:36 <Benjamin> markbirbeck: We can move several specifications and examples to be more self explanatory.
Mark Birbeck: We can move several specifications and examples to be more self explanatory. ←
14:26:19 <manu> ack benjamin
Manu Sporny: ack benjamin ←
14:26:51 <manu> q+
Manu Sporny: q+ ←
14:26:59 <manu> Benjamin: I'm wondering about who the audience is for this?
Benjamin Adrian: I'm wondering about who the audience is for this? [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:27:21 <manu> Benjamin: Maybe we want to have different sections for different readers.
Benjamin Adrian: Maybe we want to have different sections for different readers. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:28:27 <Benjamin> ivan: man target group are developers but for a while users won't have any other document source than this specification
Ivan Herman: main target group are developers but for a while users won't have any other document source than this specification ←
14:28:57 <markbirbeck> s/man target/main target/
14:29:40 <Benjamin> manu: The HTML WG also discuss on existing difficult specifications. Anyway specifications should read like an O'Reilly book.
Manu Sporny: The HTML WG also discuss on existing difficult specifications. Anyway specifications should read like an O'Reilly book. ←
14:29:47 <tinkster> q+
Toby Inkster: q+ ←
14:29:49 <markbirbeck> q+ To comment on end-users needing to be able to use specs.
Mark Birbeck: q+ To comment on end-users needing to be able to use specs. ←
14:30:01 <Benjamin> ... we have two target groups, developers and users
... we have two target groups, developers and users ←
14:30:02 <manu> ack IPcaller
Manu Sporny: ack IPcaller ←
14:30:02 <tinkster> zakim, unmute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmute me ←
14:30:03 <Zakim> tinkster should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should no longer be muted ←
14:30:12 <manu> ack [IPcaller]
Manu Sporny: ack [IPcaller] ←
14:30:44 <Benjamin> tinkster: We should publish an extra document with examples that reads like a Primer
Toby Inkster: We should publish an extra document with examples that reads like a Primer ←
14:30:51 <manu> ack mark
Manu Sporny: ack mark ←
14:30:51 <Zakim> markbirbeck, you wanted to comment on end-users needing to be able to use specs.
Zakim IRC Bot: markbirbeck, you wanted to comment on end-users needing to be able to use specs. ←
14:30:55 <tinkster> zakim, mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, mute me ←
14:30:55 <Zakim> tinkster should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should now be muted ←
14:31:01 <manu> ack tinkster
Manu Sporny: ack tinkster ←
14:31:13 <tinkster> zakim, mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, mute me ←
14:31:13 <Zakim> tinkster should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should now be muted ←
14:32:21 <Benjamin> markbirbeck: A Primer will set off pressure of this document. But a single document will preserve what is really meant to happen in the specification instead of having multiple documents like they exist for RDF(S).
Mark Birbeck: A Primer will set off pressure of this document. But a single document will preserve what is really meant to happen in the specification instead of having multiple documents like they exist for RDF(S). ←
14:32:51 <Benjamin> q+
q+ ←
14:33:44 <manu> ack Benjamin
Manu Sporny: ack Benjamin ←
14:34:06 <manu> Benjamin: Having read the document, I don't think we need to strip the document into separate documents.
Benjamin Adrian: Having read the document, I don't think we need to strip the document into separate documents. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:34:42 <manu> Benjamin: We may want several sections Beginner Users vs. Advanced Developers vs. Implementers
Benjamin Adrian: We may want several sections Beginner Users vs. Advanced Developers vs. Implementers [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:34:48 <markbirbeck> q+
Mark Birbeck: q+ ←
14:35:02 <manu> Benjamin: I think it's okay to repeat ourselves throughout the document.
Benjamin Adrian: I think it's okay to repeat ourselves throughout the document. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:36:08 <markbirbeck> :)
Mark Birbeck: :) ←
14:36:10 <manu> ack mark
Manu Sporny: ack mark ←
14:36:46 <manu> Mark: I don't think that we'll repeat ourselves as much as you think we will.
Mark Birbeck: I don't think that we'll repeat ourselves as much as you think we will. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:36:51 <Benjamin> manu: Can we publish a FPWD of this API in two weeks?
Manu Sporny: Can we publish a FPWD of this API in two weeks? ←
14:37:57 <markbirbeck> Mark: Agree with Benjamin that we shouldn't be scared of repeating ourselves in each section (with later sections being more detailed than previous ones). However, since we have some interfaces that are aimed at web developers only, and some interfaces that are aimed at more experienced programmers, then early sections will have different content to later ones.
Mark Birbeck: Agree with Benjamin that we shouldn't be scared of repeating ourselves in each section (with later sections being more detailed than previous ones). However, since we have some interfaces that are aimed at web developers only, and some interfaces that are aimed at more experienced programmers, then early sections will have different content to later ones. [ Scribe Assist by Mark Birbeck ] ←
14:38:06 <Benjamin> ivan: If we integrate the issues we are discussing here into this document, we can do a FPWD.
Ivan Herman: If we integrate the issues we are discussing here into this document, we can do a FPWD. ←
14:38:10 <tinkster> zakim, unmu8te me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmu8te me ←
14:38:10 <Zakim> I don't understand 'unmu8te me', tinkster
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'unmu8te me', tinkster ←
14:38:14 <tinkster> zakim, unmute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmute me ←
14:38:14 <Zakim> tinkster should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should no longer be muted ←
14:39:13 <Benjamin> tinkster: The API has a different shape than the current document.
Toby Inkster: The API has a different shape than the current document. ←
14:39:18 <tinkster> zakim, mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, mute me ←
14:39:18 <Zakim> tinkster should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should now be muted ←
14:40:18 <manu> Topic: ISSUE-8: Parsing CURIE lists (on Shane)
14:40:26 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/8
Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/8 ←
14:41:11 <Benjamin> manu: We never specified handling whitespaces in RDFa specs.
Manu Sporny: We never specified handling whitespaces within RDFa specs. ←
14:41:59 <ivan> q+
Ivan Herman: q+ ←
14:42:02 <manu> ack ivan
Manu Sporny: ack ivan ←
14:42:36 <Benjamin> ... e.g. newlines tabs etc. are specified in XML.
... e.g. newlines tabs etc. are specified in XML. ←
14:43:13 <tinkster> Could we recommend that authors always use a single space character?
Toby Inkster: Could we recommend that authors always use a single space character? ←
14:43:16 <Benjamin> ivan: the host language (HTML, or XML dialect) has to specify handling whitespaces.
Ivan Herman: the host language (HTML, or XML dialect) has to specify handling whitespaces. ←
14:43:20 <tinkster> (as a SHOULD)
Toby Inkster: (as a SHOULD) ←
14:44:55 <tinkster> HTML5 it seems defers the definition of whitespace to Unicode.
Toby Inkster: HTML5 it seems defers the definition of whitespace to Unicode. ←
14:46:06 <Benjamin> manu: we may propose that RDFa refers to the host language for handling whitespaces.
Manu Sporny: we may propose that RDFa refers to the host language for handling whitespaces. ←
14:46:42 <manu> PROPOSAL: RDFa defaults to the Host Language for what constitutes whitespace.
PROPOSED: RDFa defaults to the Host Language for what constitutes whitespace. ←
14:46:58 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:47:00 <Benjamin> +1
+1 ←
14:47:17 <manu> PROPOSAL: RDFa defers to the Host Language for what constitutes whitespace.
PROPOSED: RDFa defers to the Host Language for what constitutes whitespace. ←
14:47:21 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
14:47:23 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:47:24 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:47:28 <tinkster> XML just has 0x20, 0x0D, 0x0A and 0x09
Toby Inkster: XML just has 0x20, 0x0D, 0x0A and 0x09 ←
14:47:29 <Benjamin> +1
+1 ←
14:47:30 <Knud> +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:47:32 <tinkster> +0.5
Toby Inkster: +0.5 ←
14:47:59 <tinkster> (i.e. XML is space, tab, carriage return and newline)
Toby Inkster: (i.e. XML is space, tab, carriage return and newline) ←
14:48:21 <Benjamin> ivan: Did we leave whitespace handling unclear in the spec?
Ivan Herman: Did we leave whitespace handling unclear in the spec? ←
14:48:52 <tinkster> zakim, unmute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmute me ←
14:48:52 <Zakim> tinkster should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: tinkster should no longer be muted ←
14:49:07 <Benjamin> ivan: We used a whitespace separated list in CURIE specification. That should be clear enough.
Ivan Herman: We used a whitespace separated list in CURIE specification. That should be clear enough. ←
14:50:06 <Benjamin> tinkster: Most languages leave whitespace handling and occurances open e.g. in XML and HTML5
Toby Inkster: Most languages leave whitespace handling and occurances open e.g. in XML and HTML5 ←
14:50:08 <Steven> zakim, who is on the phone?
Steven Pemberton: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:50:08 <Zakim> On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster, markbirbeck
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Knud (muted), [MIT528] (muted), [IPcaller], Ivan, BenjaminA, tinkster, markbirbeck ←
14:50:16 <Steven> zakim, dial steven-617
Steven Pemberton: zakim, dial steven-617 ←
14:50:16 <Zakim> ok, Steven; the call is being made
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, Steven; the call is being made ←
14:50:18 <Zakim> +Steven
Zakim IRC Bot: +Steven ←
14:50:40 <Steven> Apologies, I got my times mixed up.... :-(
Steven Pemberton: Apologies, I got my times mixed up.... :-( ←
14:51:20 <Benjamin> tinkster: we are talking about whitespaces within attributes.
Toby Inkster: we are talking about whitespaces within attributes. ←
14:51:50 <Benjamin> ... the host language specs does not talk much about that
... the host language specs does not talk much about that ←
14:52:04 <Steven> rrsagent, here?
Steven Pemberton: rrsagent, here? ←
14:52:04 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-irc#T14-52-04
RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-irc#T14-52-04 ←
14:52:37 <Steven> rrsagent, make minutes
Steven Pemberton: rrsagent, make minutes ←
14:52:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven ←
14:53:37 <manu> PROPOSAL: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespace.
PROPOSED: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespace. ←
14:53:42 <tinkster> +1
Toby Inkster: +1 ←
14:53:48 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:53:49 <ivan> And the definition in XML spec are S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+
Ivan Herman: And the definition in XML spec are S ::= (#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA)+ ←
14:53:54 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
14:53:54 <Steven> s/whitespaces in/whitespaces within/
14:53:56 <markbirbeck> s/whitespaces in/whitespaces within/
14:53:58 <Benjamin> +1
+1 ←
14:53:59 <Knud> +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:53:59 <markbirbeck> :)
Mark Birbeck: :) ←
14:54:02 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:54:03 <Steven> :-)
Steven Pemberton: :-) ←
14:54:40 <manu> PROPOSAL: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespaces within attribute values.
PROPOSED: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespaces within attribute values. ←
14:57:45 <Benjamin> manu: Anybody disagree with the latest proposal text?
Manu Sporny: Anybody disagree with the latest proposal text? ←
14:55:01 <manu> RESOLVED: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespaces within attribute values.
RESOLVED: RDFa Core specification should specify what constitutes whitespaces within attribute values. ←
14:55:02 <markbirbeck> :)
Mark Birbeck: :) ←
14:55:29 <manu> Topic: ISSUE-6: Invalid values in @datatype (on Ivan)
14:55:36 <manu> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/6
Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/6 ←
14:57:41 <Steven> i/2) ISSUE-8: Parsing CURIE list/Topic: ISSUE-8: Parsing CURIE lists
Steven Pemberton: i/2) ISSUE-8: Parsing CURIE list/Topic: ISSUE-8: Parsing CURIE lists (warning: replacement failed) ←
14:57:44 <Benjamin> ivan: attributes with invalid values should behave like attributes with empty content
Ivan Herman: attributes with invalid values should behave like attributes with empty content ←
14:57:47 <Steven> rrsagent, make minutes
Steven Pemberton: rrsagent, make minutes ←
14:57:47 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven ←
14:57:54 <ivan> @attribute="ILLEGALVALUE" is @attribute="" or no attribute at all
Ivan Herman: @attribute="ILLEGALVALUE" is @attribute="" or no attribute at all ←
14:59:00 <manu> RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value.
Manu Sporny: RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. ←
14:59:23 <manu> PROPOSAL: RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value.
PROPOSED: RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. ←
14:59:26 <ivan> +1
Ivan Herman: +1 ←
14:59:27 <tinkster> +1
Toby Inkster: +1 ←
14:59:29 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:59:35 <Benjamin> ivan: Shane will understand that
Ivan Herman: Shane will understand that ←
14:59:37 <Benjamin> +1
+1 ←
14:59:44 <Steven> "all" or "any"?
Steven Pemberton: "all" or "any"? ←
14:59:45 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:59:49 <Knud> +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
15:00:15 <markbirbeck> all
Mark Birbeck: all ←
15:00:27 <manu> RESOLVED: RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value.
RESOLVED: RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. ←
15:00:42 <Benjamin> tinkster: we should make an errata for RDFa 1.0 spec
Toby Inkster: we should make an errata for RDFa 1.0 spec ←
15:01:11 <Steven> Errata are here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014-errata/
Steven Pemberton: Errata are here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014-errata/ ←
15:02:12 <manu> trackbot, issue Should RDFa allow relative URIs in any CURIE-based attribute?
Manu Sporny: trackbot, issue Should RDFa allow relative URIs in any CURIE-based attribute? ←
15:02:12 <trackbot> Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, issue Should RDFa allow relative URIs in any CURIE-based attribute?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, issue Should RDFa allow relative URIs in any CURIE-based attribute?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help ←
15:02:30 <ivan> Does TERMorCURIEorURIs allow relative URI-s
Ivan Herman: Does TERMorCURIEorURIs allow relative URI-s ←
15:02:38 <Steven> s/FPWG/FPWD/
Steven Pemberton: s/FPWG/FPWD/ (warning: replacement failed) ←
15:02:53 <manu> trackbot, ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs?
Manu Sporny: trackbot, ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs? ←
15:02:53 <trackbot> Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help
Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, manu, I don't understand 'trackbot, ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs?'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help ←
15:02:57 <manu> ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs?
ISSUE: Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs? ←
15:02:57 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-27 - Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs? ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/27/edit .
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ISSUE-27 - Does TermorCURIEorURI allow relative URIs? ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/27/edit . ←
15:03:19 <manu> ACTION: Shane to errata RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value.
ACTION: Shane to errata RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. ←
15:03:19 <trackbot> Created ACTION-29 - Errata RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. [on Shane McCarron - due 2010-05-27].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-29 - Errata RDFa attributes containing all invalid values should be interpreted as those attributes with an empty attribute value. [on Shane McCarron - due 2010-05-27]. ←
15:04:19 <Zakim> -tinkster
Zakim IRC Bot: -tinkster ←
15:04:23 <Zakim> -markbirbeck
Zakim IRC Bot: -markbirbeck ←
15:04:25 <Zakim> -Knud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Knud ←
15:04:25 <Benjamin> rrsagent, make minutes
rrsagent, make minutes ←
15:04:25 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Benjamin
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Benjamin ←
15:04:26 <ivan> zakim, drop me
Ivan Herman: zakim, drop me ←
15:04:27 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: -[IPcaller] ←
15:04:29 <Zakim> -Steven
Zakim IRC Bot: -Steven ←
15:04:33 <Zakim> -[MIT528]
Zakim IRC Bot: -[MIT528] ←
15:04:37 <Zakim> Ivan is being disconnected
Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan is being disconnected ←
15:04:39 <Zakim> -Ivan
Zakim IRC Bot: -Ivan ←
15:04:55 <Steven> zakim, who is on the phone?
Steven Pemberton: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
15:05:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see BenjaminA
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see BenjaminA ←
15:05:10 <Zakim> -BenjaminA
Zakim IRC Bot: -BenjaminA ←
15:05:11 <Steven> zakim, dro pBenj
Steven Pemberton: zakim, dro pBenj ←
15:05:12 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended ←
15:05:14 <Zakim> Attendees were +03539149aaaa, [MIT528], [IPcaller], Ivan, +49.631.205.7.aabb, Knud, tinkster, BenjaminA, +0208761aacc, markbirbeck, Steven
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +03539149aaaa, [MIT528], [IPcaller], Ivan, +49.631.205.7.aabb, Knud, tinkster, BenjaminA, +0208761aacc, markbirbeck, Steven ←
15:05:17 <Zakim> I don't understand 'dro pBenj', Steven
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'dro pBenj', Steven ←
15:05:24 <Steven> rrsagent, make minutes
Steven Pemberton: rrsagent, make minutes ←
15:05:24 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/05/20-rdfa-minutes.html Steven ←
Formatted by CommonScribe