None.
The document is out for review. Reviewers are all making progress and will have reviews in by next week.
Prov-o is out for review. Two reviews are in and two are still to be done.
The primer is out for review. One review is in. Two reviews are still out but being worked on
The editors of prov-aq have released an editors draft that they believe is ready to go out as a public working draft. Potential reviewers were recruited (Curt, Sam, MacTed, and Paolo). The timeline for reviews will be set-up at next week's telecon.
James is aligning the semantics as he does the review of prov-dm. He also sent prov-sem for review by an external reviewer. Paolo agreed to produce a wiki page summarizing changes in collections for James and link to it from the semantics wiki page. There was a discussion around collections and their importance in prov-dm and how they should appear with respect to the rest of the model. This was based on reviewers feedback on the prov-o, which encouraged a deemphasis of collections. Whether or not this should be the case still is an outstanding issue and the group has yet to come to a decision. MacTed brought out the notion that there were other collection representations and the authors of collections should look at ensuring a comparison or at least identify why the spec needs something else. Paolo agreed to look at this.
Paolo asked about the Linked Data Platform charter (http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter). Sandro gave a summary of it's aim. Paul emphasized that the prov-aq should be considered as a mechanism for that group to access provenance of resources.
15:01:47 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-irc ←
15:01:49 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
15:01:51 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be ←
15:01:52 <trackbot> Meeting: Provenance Working Group Teleconference
15:01:52 <trackbot> Date: 05 April 2012
15:01:58 <pgroth> Zakim, this will be PROV
Paul Groth: Zakim, this will be PROV ←
15:02:12 <pgroth> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.04.05
15:02:20 <pgroth> Chair: Paul Groth
15:02:30 <pgroth> Regrets: Luc Moreau, Timothy Lebo, Daniel Garijo
15:02:37 <MacTed> Zakim, this is PROV
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, this is PROV ←
15:02:39 <pgroth> rrsagent, make logs public
Paul Groth: rrsagent, make logs public ←
15:02:44 <MacTed> Zakim, who's here?
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, who's here? ←
15:03:17 <Zakim> ok, MacTed; that matches SW_(PROV)11:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, MacTed; that matches SW_(PROV)11:00AM ←
15:03:25 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P22, Curt_Tilmes, ??P32, Satya_Sahoo, ??P67, +329331aaaa, [OpenLink], ??P43
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see ??P22, Curt_Tilmes, ??P32, Satya_Sahoo, ??P67, +329331aaaa, [OpenLink], ??P43 ←
15:03:34 <pgroth> Zakim, ??P43 is me
Paul Groth: Zakim, ??P43 is me ←
15:03:36 <MacTed> Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me ←
15:03:54 <Zakim> +??P1
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P1 ←
15:03:57 <jun> I am do it
15:04:00 <Zakim> On IRC I see jcheney, kai, Zakim, RRSAgent, jun, stephenc, pgroth, satya, Tom_De_Nies, smiles, SamCoppens, Curt, Paolo, MacTed, stain, trackbot, sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see jcheney, kai, Zakim, RRSAgent, jun, stephenc, pgroth, satya, Tom_De_Nies, smiles, SamCoppens, Curt, Paolo, MacTed, stain, trackbot, sandro ←
15:04:08 <Zakim> +pgroth; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgroth; got it ←
15:04:10 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it ←
15:04:16 <pgroth> Topic: Admin
15:04:36 <pgroth> Minutes of the March 29 2012 Telecon
Paul Groth: Minutes of the March 29 2012 Telecon ←
15:04:42 <pgroth> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-03-29
Paul Groth: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-03-29 ←
15:04:50 <Curt> +1
Curt Tilmes: +1 ←
15:04:53 <Tom_De_Nies> +1
Tom De Nies: +1 ←
15:05:01 <jun> scribe: jun
(Scribe set to Jun Zhao)
15:05:07 <MacTed> Zakim, mute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, mute me ←
15:05:09 <jcheney> +1
James Cheney: +1 ←
15:05:16 <SamCoppens> +1
Sam Coppens: +1 ←
15:05:33 <jun> +1
+1 ←
15:05:43 <Zakim> +??P13
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P13 ←
15:05:48 <pgroth> Approved Minutes of the March 29 2012 Telecon
Paul Groth: Approved Minutes of the March 29 2012 Telecon ←
15:05:54 <satya> +1
Satya Sahoo: +1 ←
15:05:57 <Paolo> +1
Paolo Missier: +1 ←
15:06:07 <Zakim> + +44.789.470.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +44.789.470.aabb ←
15:06:07 <jcheney> zakim, ??p13 is me
James Cheney: zakim, ??p13 is me ←
15:06:11 <Zakim> +??P10
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P10 ←
15:06:14 <kai> Zakim, +??P13 is probably me.
Kai Eckert: Zakim, +??P13 is probably me. ←
15:06:19 <pgroth> Topic: PROV-DM
Summary: The document is out for review. Reviewers are all making progress and will have reviews in by next week.
<pgroth> Summary: The document is out for review. Reviewers are all making progress and will have reviews in by next week.
15:06:24 <kai> Zakim, ??P13 is probably me.
Kai Eckert: Zakim, ??P13 is probably me. ←
15:06:47 <jun> Paolo: DM constraints is out for review
Paolo Missier: DM constraints is out for review ←
15:06:59 <Zakim> MacTed should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should now be muted ←
15:07:15 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
15:07:30 <jun> ... some feedback came back, all associated with issues
... some feedback came back, all associated with issues ←
15:07:49 <SamCoppens> zakim, +329331aaaa is SamCoppens
Sam Coppens: zakim, +329331aaaa is SamCoppens ←
15:07:58 <Zakim> +jcheney; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +jcheney; got it ←
15:08:05 <jun> ... don't see any blockers to the next draft
... don't see any blockers to the next draft ←
15:08:08 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:08:10 <Zakim> sorry, kai, I do not understand your question
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, kai, I do not understand your question ←
15:08:28 <Zakim> I already had ??P13 as jcheney, kai
Zakim IRC Bot: I already had ??P13 as jcheney, kai ←
15:08:37 <jun> Paul: check progress on the reviews
Paul Groth: check progress on the reviews ←
15:08:56 <jun> Khalid: no response, not on the call
Khalid Belhajjame: no response, not on the call ←
15:09:07 <jun> Satya: would like to complete the review before giving feedback
Satya Sahoo: would like to complete the review before giving feedback ←
15:09:23 <jun> Curt: working on it
Curt Tilmes: working on it ←
15:09:23 <kai> Zakim, ??P1 is probably me.
Kai Eckert: Zakim, ??P1 is probably me. ←
15:09:31 <Zakim> +SamCoppens; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SamCoppens; got it ←
15:09:34 <jun> Jun: ongoing
15:09:58 <Tom_De_Nies> Zakim, Tom_De_Nies is with SamCoppens
Tom De Nies: Zakim, Tom_De_Nies is with SamCoppens ←
15:10:02 <jun> Tim and Graham not on the call today
Tim and Graham not on the call today ←
15:10:09 <jun> jcheney: ongoing
James Cheney: ongoing ←
15:10:24 <jun> smiles: on prov-n. done that
Simon Miles: on prov-n. done that ←
15:10:26 <Zakim> +kai?; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +kai?; got it ←
15:10:33 <jun> Topic: PROV-O
Summary: Prov-o is out for review. Two reviews are in and two are still to be done.
<pgroth> Summary: Prov-o is out for review. Two reviews are in and two are still to be done.
15:11:01 <Zakim> +Tom_De_Nies; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Tom_De_Nies; got it ←
15:11:05 <jun> Paul: essential prov-o is out for review :)
Paul Groth: essential prov-o is out for review :) ←
15:11:17 <jun> ... review progress
... review progress ←
15:11:28 <MacTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:11:33 <jun> Luc done it. Paul ongoing. Simon done it. Sam, ongoing
Luc done it. Paul ongoing. Simon done it. Sam, ongoing ←
15:11:42 <Zakim> MacTed should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed should no longer be muted ←
15:11:53 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:11:56 <jun> ... Mac Ted: ongoing
... Mac Ted: ongoing ←
15:12:13 <jun> Topic:PROV-primer
Summary: The primer is out for review. One review is in. Two reviews are still out but being worked on
<pgroth> Summary: The primer is out for review. One review is in. Two reviews are still out but being worked on
15:12:38 <jun> smiles: out for review, expect feedback from Curt and Christine. Paolo done already
Simon Miles: out for review, expect feedback from Curt and Christine. Paolo done already ←
15:12:43 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:12:43 <jun> Curt: ongoing
Curt Tilmes: ongoing ←
15:12:53 <pgroth> Topic: PROV-AQ
Summary: The editors of prov-aq have released an editors draft that they believe is ready to go out as a public working draft. Potential reviewers were recruited (Curt, Sam, MacTed, and Paolo). The timeline for reviews will be set-up at next week's telecon.
<pgroth> Summary: The editors of prov-aq have released an editors draft that they believe is ready to go out as a public working draft. Potential reviewers were recruited (Curt, Sam, MacTed, and Paolo). The timeline for reviews will be set-up at next week's telecon.
15:12:54 <Paolo> I haven't attached my reiew to the issue, sorry
Paolo Missier: I haven't attached my reiew to the issue, sorry ←
15:13:00 <Paolo> but it's out there...
Paolo Missier: but it's out there... ←
15:13:06 <pgroth> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/prov-aq.html
Paul Groth: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/prov-aq.html ←
15:13:15 <jun> Paul: went through many big changes last week
Paul Groth: went through many big changes last week ←
15:13:29 <jun> ... release an editor's draft. hopefully address all the issues in the tracker
... release an editor's draft. hopefully address all the issues in the tracker ←
15:14:02 <jun> ... use "resource" throughout in the doc. Editors think it's ready for review, for going into working draft
... use "resource" throughout in the doc. Editors think it's ready for review, for going into working draft ←
15:14:23 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:14:26 <jun> ... we can come back next week for review
... we can come back next week for review ←
15:14:37 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:15:05 <Curt> I'll try to review PAQ...
Curt Tilmes: I'll try to review PAQ... ←
15:15:14 <SamCoppens> I can do it also
Sam Coppens: I can do it also ←
15:15:20 <Paolo> potentially me -- but a bit overloaded
Paolo Missier: potentially me -- but a bit overloaded ←
15:15:23 <Paolo> with other reviews atm
Paolo Missier: with other reviews atm ←
15:15:53 <pgroth> Potential Reviewers: Curt, SamCoppens, MacTed, Paolo
Paul Groth: Potential Reviewers: Curt, SamCoppens, MacTed, Paolo ←
15:15:59 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:16:07 <jun> Potential reviewers: Curt, Sam, and Paolo
Potential reviewers: Curt, Sam, and Paolo ←
15:16:11 <pgroth> Topic: Prov-sem
Summary: James is aligning the semantics as he does the review of prov-dm. He also sent prov-sem for review by an external reviewer. Paolo agreed to produce a wiki page summarizing changes in collections for James and link to it from the semantics wiki page. There was a discussion around collections and their importance in prov-dm and how they should appear with respect to the rest of the model. This was based on reviewers feedback on the prov-o, which encouraged a deemphasis of collections. Whether or not this should be the case still is an outstanding issue and the group has yet to come to a decision. MacTed brought out the notion that there were other collection representations and the authors of collections should look at ensuring a comparison or at least identify why the spec needs something else. Paolo agreed to look at this.
<pgroth> Summary: James is aligning the semantics as he does the review of prov-dm. He also sent prov-sem for review by an external reviewer. Paolo agreed to produce a wiki page summarizing changes in collections for James and link to it from the semantics wiki page. There was a discussion around collections and their importance in prov-dm and how they should appear with respect to the rest of the model. This was based on reviewers feedback on the prov-o, which encouraged a deemphasis of collections. Whether or not this should be the case still is an outstanding issue and the group has yet to come to a decision. MacTed brought out the notion that there were other collection representations and the authors of collections should look at ensuring a comparison or at least identify why the spec needs something else. Paolo agreed to look at this.
15:16:14 <Paolo> q+
Paolo Missier: q+ ←
15:17:07 <jun> jcheney: aligned the doc with WD-3. will go ahead to align it with the latest WD soonish
James Cheney: aligned the doc with WD-3. will go ahead to align it with the latest WD soonish ←
15:17:37 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:17:40 <pgroth> ack Paolo
Paul Groth: ack Paolo ←
15:19:23 <jun> Paolo: add collections in the semantics doc?
Paolo Missier: add collections in the semantics doc? ←
15:19:26 <Zakim> +??P6
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P6 ←
15:19:52 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:20:38 <smiles> q+
Simon Miles: q+ ←
15:20:57 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:20:58 <jun> jcheney: will read through everything and think about it. would be helpful to have a summary about what's needed to be clarified
James Cheney: will read through everything and think about it. would be helpful to have a summary about what's needed to be clarified ←
15:21:19 <jun> Paolo: I can put up a wiki page to summarize things
Paolo Missier: I can put up a wiki page to summarize things ←
15:21:33 <jun> ... put a link on the formal semantics wiki page
... put a link on the formal semantics wiki page ←
15:21:33 <pgroth> ack smiles
Paul Groth: ack smiles ←
15:21:39 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:22:19 <pgroth> q+
Paul Groth: q+ ←
15:22:27 <Paolo> q+
Paolo Missier: q+ ←
15:22:30 <jun> smiles: collection as a separate/lesser part of the DM model? where is this idea coming from?
Simon Miles: collection as a separate/lesser part of the DM model? where is this idea coming from? ←
15:23:16 <pgroth> ack pgroth
Paul Groth: ack pgroth ←
15:23:23 <pgroth> ack Paolo
Paul Groth: ack Paolo ←
15:23:24 <jun> Paul: they add a level of complexity. and we don't want to scary people away by this and put a lesser emphasis on it
Paul Groth: they add a level of complexity. and we don't want to scary people away by this and put a lesser emphasis on it ←
15:23:55 <jun> Paolo: this is really about introducing a new data structure. believe this is fundamental.
Paolo Missier: this is really about introducing a new data structure. believe this is fundamental. ←
15:24:59 <pgroth> q+
Paul Groth: q+ ←
15:25:07 <jun> .... things become more complicated than anticipated. took longer to reconcile. and left with less time to include collection properly in documents
.... things become more complicated than anticipated. took longer to reconcile. and left with less time to include collection properly in documents ←
15:25:08 <MacTed> Zakim, unmute me
Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, unmute me ←
15:25:08 <Zakim> MacTed was not muted, MacTed
Zakim IRC Bot: MacTed was not muted, MacTed ←
15:25:14 <MacTed> q+
Ted Thibodeau: q+ ←
15:25:46 <jun> Paul: and we should take Luc's comments as his own comments, not final or for the group
Paul Groth: and we should take Luc's comments as his own comments, not final or for the group ←
15:25:53 <pgroth> ack pgroth
Paul Groth: ack pgroth ←
15:26:23 <jun> Mac: we should try to avoid thinking about reinventing everything
Ted Thibodeau: we should try to avoid thinking about reinventing everything ←
15:26:40 <jun> ... collection is just another type of entity
... collection is just another type of entity ←
15:27:12 <jun> ... we don't need to redefine what a collection is
... we don't need to redefine what a collection is ←
15:27:36 <Paolo> q+
Paolo Missier: q+ ←
15:27:39 <jun> ... concerned that there might be re-definition of things or re-invention of things
... concerned that there might be re-definition of things or re-invention of things ←
15:27:42 <MacTed> ack me
Ted Thibodeau: ack me ←
15:27:44 <pgroth> ack MacTed
Paul Groth: ack MacTed ←
15:27:47 <pgroth> ack Paolo
Paul Groth: ack Paolo ←
15:27:52 <jcheney> http://code.google.com/p/collections-ontology/ ??
James Cheney: http://code.google.com/p/collections-ontology/ ?? ←
15:28:11 <jun> Paolo: pointers for specific places to draw knowledge for provenance for collections?
Paolo Missier: pointers for specific places to draw knowledge for provenance for collections? ←
15:28:25 <MacTed> http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/
Ted Thibodeau: http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/ ←
15:28:56 <jun> @mac, I think the collections spec is a bit different from what sioc means
@mac, I think the collections spec is a bit different from what sioc means ←
15:29:25 <jun> Mac: the sioc spec is an example
Ted Thibodeau: the sioc spec is an example ←
15:29:39 <pgroth> jun can you use MacTed not Mac
Paul Groth: jun can you use MacTedTed not MacTed ←
15:29:52 <pgroth> it's hard to process the minutes otherwise
Paul Groth: it's hard to process the minutes otherwise ←
15:29:55 <jun> Paolo: it's slightly different to describe evolution of collections
Paolo Missier: it's slightly different to describe evolution of collections ←
15:30:15 <jun> s/Mac/MacTed/
15:30:34 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:30:38 <smiles> q+
Simon Miles: q+ ←
15:30:46 <jun> Paolo: we should take this offline and will take a look at the sioc doc
Paolo Missier: we should take this offline and will take a look at the sioc doc ←
15:30:47 <Curt> collections of provenance (out of scope -- use existing ways) != provenance of collections (we are trying to model a common way to represent that)
Curt Tilmes: collections of provenance (out of scope -- use existing ways) != provenance of collections (we are trying to model a common way to represent that) ←
15:31:01 <pgroth> ack smiles
Paul Groth: ack smiles ←
15:31:05 <jun> smiles: do we have reviewers for the semantics doc?
Simon Miles: do we have reviewers for the semantics doc? ←
15:31:34 <jun> Paul: we are not yet ready for the semantics doc. it's not planned to be in sync with other docs
Paul Groth: we are not yet ready for the semantics doc. it's not planned to be in sync with other docs ←
15:32:11 <pgroth> ack smiles
Paul Groth: ack smiles ←
15:32:35 <jun> jcheney: plan to review everything to identify things to be updated for the semantics. rather to align semantics against a fixed document. people can sign up for reviews now though
James Cheney: plan to review everything to identify things to be updated for the semantics. rather to align semantics against a fixed document. people can sign up for reviews now though ←
15:32:48 <jun> Paul: semantics is a note. we are not as pressed for this as for other docs
Paul Groth: semantics is a note. we are not as pressed for this as for other docs ←
15:33:09 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:33:15 <jun> jcheney: I want to contribute to the reviews of other doc. and it should be fairly straightforward to update the semantics doc
James Cheney: I want to contribute to the reviews of other doc. and it should be fairly straightforward to update the semantics doc ←
15:33:40 <pgroth> Topic: Linked Data Platform
Summary: Paolo asked about the Linked Data Platform charter (http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter). Sandro gave a summary of it's aim. Paul emphasized that the prov-aq should be considered as a mechanism for that group to access provenance of resources.
<pgroth> Summary: Paolo asked about the Linked Data Platform charter (http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter). Sandro gave a summary of it's aim. Paul emphasized that the prov-aq should be considered as a mechanism for that group to access provenance of resources.
15:34:16 <stainPhone> @Paolo, url..?
Stian Soiland-Reyes: @Paolo, url..? ←
15:34:38 <jun> Paolo: feedback to this from the group?
Paolo Missier: feedback to this from the group? ←
15:35:24 <jcheney> is this it http://data.nature.com/
James Cheney: is this it http://data.nature.com/ ←
15:35:25 <jun> Sandro: the group was formed based on a critical mass
Sandro Hawke: the group was formed based on a critical mass ←
15:36:14 <pgroth> @jcheney http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter
Paul Groth: @jcheney http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter ←
15:36:30 <jcheney> aha I see it
James Cheney: aha I see it ←
15:36:30 <jun> ... provide a place for common mind people to talk together
... provide a place for common mind people to talk together ←
15:36:37 <pgroth> +q
Paul Groth: +q ←
15:36:44 <jun> ... they are putting up documents up to describe what they did
... they are putting up documents up to describe what they did ←
15:36:59 <jun> .. not sure where provenance fits into this
.. not sure where provenance fits into this ←
15:37:18 <jun> Paolo: thanks for the response
Paolo Missier: thanks for the response ←
15:37:35 <pgroth> ack pgroth
Paul Groth: ack pgroth ←
15:37:37 <pgroth> q?
Paul Groth: q? ←
15:37:38 <jun> Paul: PAQ should be very related to their work
Paul Groth: PAQ should be very related to their work ←
15:37:48 <jun> Paul: AOB?
Paul Groth: AOB? ←
15:38:09 <Zakim> -Satya_Sahoo
Zakim IRC Bot: -Satya_Sahoo ←
15:38:11 <Zakim> -??P6
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P6 ←
15:38:11 <Zakim> -??P22
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P22 ←
15:38:13 <Zakim> -??P67
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P67 ←
15:38:13 <Zakim> - +44.789.470.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: - +44.789.470.aabb ←
15:38:14 <Zakim> -Curt_Tilmes
Zakim IRC Bot: -Curt_Tilmes ←
15:38:14 <Zakim> -jcheney
Zakim IRC Bot: -jcheney ←
15:38:15 <Zakim> -??P10
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P10 ←
15:38:16 <Zakim> -MacTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -MacTed ←
15:38:19 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
15:38:21 <Zakim> -SamCoppens
Zakim IRC Bot: -SamCoppens ←
15:38:22 <Zakim> -pgroth
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgroth ←
15:38:26 <Zakim> -??P32
Zakim IRC Bot: -??P32 ←
15:38:44 <pgroth> rrsagent, set log public
Paul Groth: rrsagent, set log public ←
15:38:49 <pgroth> rrsagent, draft minutes
Paul Groth: rrsagent, draft minutes ←
15:38:49 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-minutes.html pgroth
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-minutes.html pgroth ←
15:38:53 <pgroth> trackbot, end telcon
Paul Groth: trackbot, end telcon ←
15:38:53 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, list attendees ←
15:38:53 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been Curt_Tilmes, Satya_Sahoo, pgroth, MacTed, +44.789.470.aabb, Sandro, jcheney, SamCoppens, kai?, Tom_De_Nies
Zakim IRC Bot: As of this point the attendees have been Curt_Tilmes, Satya_Sahoo, pgroth, MacTed, +44.789.470.aabb, Sandro, jcheney, SamCoppens, kai?, Tom_De_Nies ←
15:39:01 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, please draft minutes ←
15:39:01 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-minutes.html trackbot
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/05-prov-minutes.html trackbot ←
15:39:02 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, bye ←
15:39:02 <RRSAgent> I see no action items
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I see no action items ←
Formatted by CommonScribe