See also: IRC log
<scribe> Scribe: Jan
<scribe> Chair: Jutta Treviranus
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
JS: Judy would like the WG to
look at the new updates and approve them...
... THere are a few things she has requested changed...
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
JS: Number 7 is new: Maintain Implementing ATAG 2.0 post-Recommendation with additional examples and resources to include authoring tools on devices, technologies and industries, including digital publishing, native mobile authoring applications, and social media authoring on mobile web and webTV.
http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/draft_auwg_charter.html
TB: 10 items prioritized?
JS: Scope section is just the possible things we're allowed to do.
TB: So if we don't get tothem it's ok?
JS: Right...the Deliverables are
what we have to do, the scope is what we can do it we
like
... One of the issues we got back from W3M is that the
deliverables should be done in 2014...and therefore perhaps the
WG should be wound up
TB: So we're inventing work to
continue? What's motivation?
... There's always maintenance...
JS: No...unless we state what we
could be doing... that's why #7 says maintaining
... If you scroll down to milestones....
... "Implementing ATAG 2.0 for Mobile Applications" etc.
documents will be removed from Milestones
TB: Would this cover non-Web as well?
JS: Yes this would be
covered.
... I tried to make it open ended enpugh.
JT: Doc names are stlill there in what we are looking at?
JS: Yes, Judyd let me know a couple of minutes before the call.
JT: Any objections to changes?
Resolution: All WG members on the call accept the AUWG charter changes.
TB: Next steps?
JS: We need positive comments from AC reps during voting on the charter...I will send a reminder when the voting time nears
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130903/
JS: Thanks to everyone helping
get the new draft ready
... Look at the Status section...
<jeanne> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ED-ATAG20-20130903/#status
Status of This Document
W3C Editors' Draft of ATAG 2.0
This is the W3C Editors' Draft of the document that will be the Last Call Working Draft of @@ September 2013. This updated draft integrates changes as a result of public comments, experience from developing the test suite, and from identifying preliminary implementations in preparation for Candidate Recommendation phase of the W3C process.
Publication as a Last Call Working Draft indicates that the AUWG believes it has addressed all substantive issues and that the document is stable.The first public Working Draft of ATAG 2.0 was published 14 March 2003. Since then, the AUWG has published thirteen Working Drafts and three previous Last Call Working Drafts, addressed hundreds of issues and developed implementation support...
scribe: information for the guidelines. See How WAI Develops Accessibility Guidelines through the W3C Process for more background on document maturity levels.
Substantial changes in this draft:
B.2.4.4 Accessible Template Options (Enhanced) After feedback, AUWG decided to simplify this AAA success criterion back to the original intent, which was to have all accessible templates.
B.2.5.1 Accessible Pre-Authored Content Options In response to comments, new definitions were created for pre-authored content and accessible pre-authored content. The wording for B.2.5.1 was aligned with the wording for B.2.4.1 Accessible Template Options.
B.2.5.2 Identify Pre-Authored Content Accessibility: The changes to B.2.5.1 necessitated an overhaul of B.2.5.2 to address the same concerns.The concept of accessibility status was removed and replaced with accessible pre-authored content. The wording was aligned with B.2.4.2 Identify Template Accessibility.
Comments on these changes are due on or before @@ October 2013. Comments should be sent to public-atag2-comments@w3.org (Public Archive).
The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (AUWG) intends to publish ATAG 2.0 as a W3C Recommendation. Until that time Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 1.0 [ATAG10] is the stable, referenceable version. This Working Draft does not supersede ATAG 1.0.
JR: Looks good
TB: Looks good
JS: If all things go
correctly...we will publish soon.
... The plan is that we will have a 3 week comment
time...
... Then we will turn-around and publish CR.
... We will need to schedule a Directors meeting as part of
going to CR.
... Any questions?
TB: Are testing materials in place sufficiently?
JS: We have the testing materials
document....I will present that and say we don't have a working
test runner yet...
... We will use a copy of the WCAG2 test runner.... we need to
load in the tests and update the tester instructions.
... I'm hoping that as soon as we publish I'll be able to
concentrate on getting this working
JT: Great
TB: great
JS: One more thing I need to do is add extra columns to our "Comment Responses" spreadsheets
JT: Thanks!
TB: Yes
JR: I will update with the info for IBM's Media Caption Editor
JS: Also the Media Caption Editor will be an ATAG2 Implementor... which is very good...thanks Tom!
TB: And EasyChirp should be ready in a few weeks
JT: OK great...any more issue for today?
JS: Not from me
JT: Wonderful it's been a very positive meeting!
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Judy/Judy should/ Succeeded: s/Judy should shoul/Judy/ Found Scribe: Jan Inferring ScribeNick: Jan Default Present: Jan, Jutta, Jeanne, +1.847.917.aaaa, Tom, Tim_Boland, Alastair Present: Jan Jutta Jeanne +1.847.917.aaaa Tom Tim_Boland Alastair Regrets: Alex L. Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013JulSep/0046.html Got date from IRC log name: 09 Sep 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/09/09-au-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]