W3C

- DRAFT -

HTML Weekly Teleconference

09 May 2013

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
+1.626.379.aaaa, Sam, +1.206.850.aabb, janina, krisk, +1.818.406.aacc, jaymunro, +1.425.214.aadd, Bin_Hu, MarkS, hober, Plh, glenn, tantek
Regrets
Chair
rubys
Scribe
krisk

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 09 May 2013

* I can scribe - let me pull up the agenda

<scribe> scribe: krisk

1. ACTION items due by Thursday, May 9

ACTION-226: Make sure that the organizational structure of github

<trackbot> Notes added to ACTION-226 Make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented.

<rubys> ACTION-226?

<trackbot> ACTION-226 -- Kris Krueger to make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented -- due 2013-04-30 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/226

I have not made any progress but will have the wiki updated by next week

<rubys> ACTION-226 due next week

<trackbot> Set ACTION-226 Make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented due date to next week.

New Issues This Week:

rubys: none
... let's talk about the f2f web performance at the enfo (other business)

Items Closing This Week

rubys: none

Items Closing Next Week

rubys: actually this should be 'closing' this week

CfC: remove Microdata from HTML 5.0, incorporate Microdata into 5.1

<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013May/0000.html

tantek: can we discuss the microdata moves to 5.1?

rubys: yes
... we are moving all of microdata from the htm5.0 spec and into 5.1

tantek: I'd like to promote the use of extension specs
... Maybe this could be done with microdata?

rubys: if the whatwg makes this a seperate spec then this could be done, though if not we would need a editor to signup to do this work
... right now we are just focused on 5.0 and don't want to make a rash move to remove it completely

tantek: Having this in 5.1 seems to go against our modulatity principals

rubys: tantek can you send a mail to the list to make sure the group has consensus?

tantek: sure

rubys: I don't think you are missing anything other then the ask for a editor to sign up for the work.
... please bring this up on the list and we can discuss what we want to do beyond removing from HTML5.0
... any other comments other than bring this up on the list?

<glenn> :)

<tantek> Thanks Sam and Daniel for the discussion

Decisions this week

<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013May/0030.html

<rubys> http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/05/perspectives_on_encrypted_medi.html

rubys: one decision has occured to allow EME to proceed as a First Public Working draft

glenn: If a formal objection occurs, will this reverse the FPWD?

plh: The process doesn't require the Director to address Formal Objections prior to the move out of Last Call, there has been instances where the Director did however, such as microdata for example

glenn: I am happy to see things move forward

Task Force Reports

SUBTOPIC: Testing Task Force

krisk: I don't have much to report here - I was not able to make the meeting this week
... Though I should have more to report next time

SUBTOPIC: Accessibility Task Force

Group has continued to meet

The group has focused on what areas of the spec need testing

<janina> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21985

We are working on getting bugs that impact 5.0 taken care of..

We are working on the extension specs such and have these ready in June

The group is working on creating proposal for 'transcript' - ISSUE 194

rubys: any other questions or comments for Janina?

SUBTOPIC: Media Task Force

rubys: anyone here to provide status?

Other Business

Proposal: stop work on "HTML: The Markup Language" and "HTML5:

<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013May/0016.html

rubys: please take a look at the list, no specific date

daniel: It would be good to have this for authors

rubys: The belief is that this is being addressed in another better mechanism vs the xlst/xml transforms

daniel: This seems like a key deliverable for authors and I'd like to see this not be dropped
... I'll look on the list for more information

rubys: please do

janina: It seems it's more about how we do this rather than not doing this work

rubys: correct

daniel: I'll catch up on this via the list

SUBTOPIC: Web Performance and Error Handling from F2F

The WP WG is looking to have a futrue proof errors beyond networking (DNS, TCPIP, etc) such that it covers css, html, javascript errors

The upshot is that the WP WG should be able to accomidate this for these newer classes

daniel has an action item to go look for specific examples where this could be used in the HTML spec

rubys: and other business to discuss?
... Scribe for next meeting?
... Adjournment

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.138 (CVS log)
$Date: 2013-05-09 16:37:53 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/format/formal/
Succeeded: s/The process would (object) doesn't apply until last call/The process doesn't require the Director to address Formal Objections prior to the move out of Last Call/
Succeeded: s/in this instance the Director actually looked earlier in the process/there has been instances where the Director did however, such as microdata for example/
Found Scribe: krisk
Inferring ScribeNick: krisk
Default Present: +1.626.379.aaaa, Sam, +1.206.850.aabb, janina, krisk, +1.818.406.aacc, jaymunro, +1.425.214.aadd, Bin_Hu, MarkS, hober, Plh, glenn, tantek
Present: +1.626.379.aaaa Sam +1.206.850.aabb janina krisk +1.818.406.aacc jaymunro +1.425.214.aadd Bin_Hu MarkS hober Plh glenn tantek
Found Date: 09 May 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/05/09-html-wg-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]