Discussion of semiotics model

Agreement on class names

Not on property names

name of concept/synset?

Paul: "synset" is too specific

unionist model of SKOS and OWL?

is a lexical concept different from a synset?

Paul: The key denotation of meaning is between lexical entry and ontology entity

matching to linguistic resources involves an "explosion" of semantic objects

Paul: model captures different levels in the semantics, is this core to the ontolex model?
... Core of the group is adding morphosyntactic information to ontologies

Lupe: Concept is conflux of different models: WordNet FrameNet etc.

Lexical Entry and Ontology entity is core, Lexical Sense is required for annotation of word+meaning simultaneously

Concept is non-core, and captures annotation that is not in formal logic and not given to a word

Francesa: How do we find senses?

Philipp: Senses are defined by concepts in legacy resources/ontology entities used for each word

Not in the group to define the process for defining senses

"synset" is too technical and only part of WordNet

Lupe: Not happy with "lexical" (word) and "concept" (representation)

Alessandro: "lexical concept" is a concept with a lexicalization

Armando: "lexicalized concept" is better (?)

Other options "meaning" or "intention"

Philipp: concepts may not always be lexicalized

Lupe: What about the combinations "syn-con" or "con-set"

Philipp: Intention is perhaps closest to what we mean

*Intension

Philipp: link between sense and concept is similar to FrameNet's evokes property

Armando: Properties in other direction

yes, they should be included by formula, e.g., "sense" to "isSenseOf"

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138  of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: jmccrae
Inferring Scribes: jmccrae

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Alessandro Armando Francesa Lupe Paul Philipp joined left ontolex
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 03 May 2013
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/05/03-ontolex-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.