See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 10 April 2013
http://www.balisage.net/XML-Interfaces/index.html
<scribe> scribe: nick
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0004.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0001.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Mar/0020.html
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3781&oldid=3780
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3782&oldid=3781
nvdbleek: for me those changes were fine
pfennell: I didn't have a change to have a look yet
nvdbleek: We give people one week to send in comments
ebruchez: The changes are minimal
mediatype to accept on upload))
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0006.html
ACTION-1934?
<trackbot> ACTION-1934 -- Nick Van Den Bleeken to update the XML and relax-ng schema (change mediatype to accept on upload) -- due 2013-02-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/1934
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0006.html
ebruchez: If it is deprecated it should not be removed from the schema
nvdbleek: OK, I will add it back
to the XML and Relax schema
... I will do the update later today
the text area control similar like it is done for xs:date on xf:input
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0007.html
nvdbleek: Spec changes
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3791&oldid=3789
... ebruchez, pfennell are you going to read it now or should
we put it on the agenda for next week
ebruchez: I had a first glance at it now, it looks good, but I want to have a closer look
nvdbleek: OK we will leave it on the agenda, and ask other people to comment before next call
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Mar/0018.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Mar/0019.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Jan/0028.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Apr/0013.html
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3795&oldid=3791
nvdbleek: I made as less changes as possible maybe we need to make more
ebruchez: I definitely want to review this
nvdbleek: We will keep on the agenda for next week. Everybody should review it and send in comments before next call
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2012Nov/0023.html
nvdbleek: Does anybody wants another name then property?
pfennell: property is reasonable
ebruchez: property as element
name is fine
... They use property in javascript
... In our implementation we initially had context
nvdbleek: and we already use the name context for the xpath context
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2012Nov/0012.html
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XPath_Expressions_Module#The_serialize.28.29_Function
ebruchez: Steven had a proposal to use a submission element
nvdbleek: On submission you can specify more parameters then the output format parameters, you would ignore those then I guess?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-30/#func-serialize
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-xquery-serialization-30/#serparams-in-xdm-instance
nvdbleek: In xpath 3.0 they use an element output:serialization-parameters
ebruchez: They chose a name that
is so large...
... I don't think the element has to have a particular name
nvdbleek: Wouldn't that be for validation
ebruchez: You only need the
attributes
... Ideally you have named parameters, but you can't do that in
XPath
... If we go for submission, we probably have to make a lot of
changes for allowing only a subset of attributes
... I'm proposing to pass in an element and only look at the
attributes on the element (we will ignore the element
name)
... I will send a reply with the proposal
<scribe> ACTION: Erik to send his proposal about passing an element to the serialise and parse functions for the format options and only look at the attributes on the element (we will ignore the element name) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/04/10-forms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1942 - Send his proposal about passing an element to the serialise and parse functions for the format options and only look at the attributes on the element (we will ignore the element name) [on Erik Bruchez - due 2013-04-17].
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137 of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: nvdbleek Found Scribe: nick Default Present: pfennell, ebruchez, nvdbleek Present: pfennell ebruchez nvdbleek Found Date: 10 Apr 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/04/10-forms-minutes.html People with action items: erik WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]