See also: IRC log
<fsasaki> yves giving presentation
<fsasaki> comment on presentation from yves - reviewers probably don't know the idea of "domain mapping" - may need to explain that briefly
<fsasaki> pedro: business part?
<fsasaki> yves: is in two slides of the presentation
<fsasaki> .. very generic business value
<Declan> agree - good to have mixture of more technical presentations together with business-focused presentations. Very reflective of the project
<fsasaki> +1 to declan
<fsasaki> clemens presenting cocomore slides
<fsasaki> I like the "saving time" slides
<fsasaki> it might make sense to have no demo in the presentation, to safe some time
<fsasaki> dave: quantification of business benefits are very good
<fsasaki> .. will you use mlw-lt template?
<fsasaki> clemens: wasn't aware of that
<fsasaki> david: need parts like like european flag
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Rome-lux-prep
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Rome-lux-prep#Draft_agenda
<fsasaki> pedro: to discuss - we prepared a built. Doing in real time takes longer
<fsasaki> .. for luxembourg we could do this in a film
<fsasaki> cocomore and linguaserve to have a film about their technical interaction
<fsasaki> pedro: for luxembourg we have to pay attention to time
<fsasaki> film finished by friday 8 march?
<fsasaki> mauricio presenting screen capture
<fsasaki> pedro: two other videos
<fsasaki> .. about pre- and postprocessing
<fsasaki> pedro showing demo
<fsasaki> connection to dcu server gives an error - needs to be fixed for demo
<fsasaki> slides for client in rome - will use http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/att-0156/slides-template-v1.pptx for luxembourg
<fsasaki> good to emphasize: the need for the metadata was clear for the linguaserve client - case before MLW-LT
<fsasaki> need to allow time for q/a
<fsasaki> use 10 min tech demo, 10 min business
<fsasaki> emphasize also what is *not* yet finished
<fsasaki> tadej presenting slides
<fsasaki> use cases - would add localization workflow, e.g. usage in XLIFF as a way to inform both the human and machine agent
<fsasaki> workflow - automatic domani generation - choice of MT system
<fsasaki> dave: figure out where enrycher is or will be used
<Yves_> To Tadej: That was nice and to the point.
<Yves_> FYI: We have a mention to an Enrycher step in our sildes.
<fsasaki> support of business case
<fsasaki> quality assurance by humans and MT disambiguation usage of TA annotations
<fsasaki> make clear what is prototype and what is working
<fsasaki> make business value of LOD clear, e.g. cross-silo queries, gathering statistics across data sets
<fsasaki> ankit showing slides
<fsasaki> how to present "life" an MT training system at the review?
<fsasaki> dave: focus on workplan - maybe rather focus on technical aspects?
<fsasaki> ankit: will have demo of MT service + re-training
<fsasaki> david: we are doing xliff-roundtripp
<fsasaki> .. xliff enters platform in two ways: extractor driven by okapi
<fsasaki> .. and via cms-lion
<fsasaki> .. we will show how human consumers can see the display throught the cycle
<fsasaki> felix: can you do a screencast for that?
<fsasaki> dave, david will look at that next week
<fsasaki> felix - by friday next week
<fsasaki> future directions - point out NIF <> ITS connection and this as a way to address "multilayer" issue for text analysis
<fsasaki> also a video would be good
<fsasaki> maurico: advantage of video - you can show what happens in one step
<fsasaki> .. the time for that expected is then clear
<fsasaki> .. in a video you can delete all the steps that just take time, changing between windows etc
<fsasaki> dave: posters - put on page for presentations in the wiki
<fsasaki> discussion about circle re-do
<Declan> common to give reviewers access to dissemination materials - so we should definitely make them available
<fsasaki> thanks, declan, will send out links before the review
<fsasaki> send out = send out to reviewers
<fsasaki> - how to integrate other partners - make slides showing their use cases
<philr> Apologies I have to drop out now. I'll check the minutes for any last items
<fsasaki> at the end of demo part
<fsasaki> ok, thanks, philr
<fsasaki> make clear then things are delivered
<fsasaki> - what to do in 2013 and beyond?
<fsasaki> "beyond"
<fsasaki> pedro - how to maintain the ITS group
<fsasaki> .. to do a plan for this is important
<fsasaki> .. and how to spread the word and how to evangelize for clients, CMS people etc.
<fsasaki> .. to take into account ITS2
<fsasaki> .. so that people don't finish in 2014
<fsasaki> .. in 2014 should continue to work ITS2 as a group of work, in conferences etc.
<fsasaki> .. give support to companies
<fsasaki> ... if there is an active group it is easer to get adoption by clients
<fsasaki> .. if clients see a group of people who continue people supporting it
<fsasaki> dave: having a clear path is one part of the continuation
<fsasaki> .. list projects where we leverage MLW-lT
<fsasaki> .. e.g. mention projects we put in
<fsasaki> .. e..g how we use ITS in CNGL2
<fsasaki> .. can send a few points for the slides
<fsasaki> .. also, need to talk about events
<fsasaki> .. e.g. mlw workhsops, FEISGILT event etc.
<fsasaki> pedro: business side also - allowing 3rd parties to use ITS: group could provide support and consultancy
<fsasaki> dave: yes, best practices, making test suite more user friendly etc.
<fsasaki> .. list out best practices we are working on
<fsasaki> next week another call, again 1 p.m. UTC, with videos + missing slides