See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/ED-metrics-20121114.html
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/comments-20120830
shadi puts up edited drafts of ED metrics
simon asks markel to go through changes or whatever suites
shadi gives some options as how to process the edited versions
simon asks markel to go through the main comments for ~10 minutes or so
markel thinks the most efficient way is to go through each comment of each author
simon asks if we need to clode the 'open' status and if people will be commenting back to the open items
shadi says yes, it is best practice and that people should responde to each comment (probably comment by comment)
shadi feels that perhaps only discussing the comments defined as 'necessary'
shadi says we need to agree on the responses to the comments
simon says it should go out to the emai list rather than getting bogged down in this meeting - simon to send out email asking if which items need comment - aka 'out of scope'
markel says that maybe this documents can be use as a response to the authors - sometimes the context may be lost - as comments do not line up with the document contents
shadi agree with markel - says we send a collective email as to 'how we respond to your comments' - the 'out of scope' comments need further explanation
markel agrees with shadi and that the 'out of scope' needs explaining
simon to send out email looking for comments on the responses to be sent from the group
simon says progress is being made on mobile note
no comments re mobile note
no comments on text customisation note
silvia sends regrets
klaus is not well and will be moving forward item 5 in a couple of weeks
shadi - have we got timelines on item 5
simon checks email archives to see what klaus has said - 'going to work on it after csun' (next week)
simon discusses the coordination group and will be meeting them tonight - sent through the topics - (asks shadi if it is open to everyone) - shadi says no
<sharper> At last weeks RDWG meeting we decided to take forward three topics:
<sharper> User Modelling
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/User_modelling
<sharper> Haptics and Smart Images
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Smart_Images
<sharper> Accessible Notification
<sharper> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Accessible_Notifications
<sharper> And we would now like to discuss these with the CG including their order
<sharper> - and timelines.
<sharper> In addition, are there any candidates the CG thing may be more useful:
<sharper> Finally, we are also looking to discuss Developing Regions (with the new
<sharper> India community group) and also accessible annotations (with the new
<sharper> open annotations community group). Indeed, could we move these two along
<sharper> in parallel to each other and our own work with some oversight by us but
<sharper> with editors from these community groups?
simon adds list of topics
markhu making adding content a priority
simon discusses the three topics selected last week
simon says we will soon have an idea of what topic will be focussed on in the upcoming symposia
simon says no further comments on the topics (against at least)
markhu discusses smart images and haptics and the sort of tie in between the topics
vivienne proposes meeting of RDWG group at W4A 2013 and pehaps get some work done together face to face
markel thinks this idea should go through the general chair of the W4A
<Luz> I will be in Rio one month before W4A, so I offer to help in anything your need, such as local issues.
<Vivienne> I'm happy to help in any way that I can
<sharper> Ackshadi
Dave agrees that such an event should take place, as organised by the general chairs
shadi supports informal gathering, but does not want to add the the workload of the general chairs - question of whether there will be sufficient people to have a F2F and maybe find rooms to accomodate the group
shadi suggests survey to find out who is going
shadi feels there are multiple deliverables that we could work on as a group in a F2F meeting
shadi to put up a WBS
<Vivienne> yup
<Vivienne> yes he is
<Luz> Yes
<Luz> I will be there before
<Luz> so i can help
<christos> unfortunately... no
<markel> Giorgio should be going too
shadi asks if W4A is 3 days this year
simon says that perhaps thursday woud be a good day to meet
<DaveS> I would support the proposal of a F2F meeting on Thursday after W4A
markel wonders if we can squeeze the meeting into the wednesday of the W4A
simon proposes smaller meetings of part time wednesday and thursday
shadi says 2 full days gets better work done
simon says that the sruvey should cover the options that people prefer for the meeting
simon raised layout and styles but shawn not available
any other business raised