See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 10 January 2013
chair sean hayes
<scribe> scribenick: mmartin3
zzakim,aaaa is Andreas
akim, aaaa is Andreas
Issue-198?
<trackbot> ISSUE-198 -- Add TTML in Title of SDP-US for Ready Recognition -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/198
mmartin3: For ease of recognition.
mike: sounds reasonable.
Link: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml10-sdp-us/
glenn: Where do we put it?
mjordan: What about after SDP?
glenn: Monica's suggestion is preferred.
Resolved to add TTML to the name of SDP-US.
<scribe> ACTION: Glenn Add "TTML" to name of SDP-US. Link: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml10-sdp-us/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/01/10-tt-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-137 - Add "TTML" to name of SDP-US. Link: http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml10-sdp-us/ [on Glenn Adams - due 2013-01-17].
<glenn> monica's suggestion is to put TTML at beginning of title
sean: Redundant list of features in Appendix B.
glenn: Don't serve any real
purpose.
... Features defined in Section 9.
... Duplicative and could become out of sync (current
case).
mike: Informative summary could also be added.
Resolved: Remove two subsections in Appendix A.
c/A/B
<glenn> remove two paragraphs after table in appendix B
<scribe> ACTION: Glenn Delete 2 paragraphs after table in Appendix B of SDP-US. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/01/10-tt-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-138 - Delete 2 paragraphs after table in Appendix B of SDP-US. [on Glenn Adams - due 2013-01-17].
sean: Fix in editor's draft.
glenn: Has to check URLs.
mike: Public?
http://www.w3.org/TR/ttml10-sdp-us/
pal: Add origin and extent to
SDP-US?
... Section 9.
... Do we need display-region?
glenn: Support styling.
... Do we need display for other elements in addition of
region?
... Don't think we need on other elements like span.
... No change.
mmartin3: We have requirements in extent-region.
sean: Need to add extent and origin to Section 9.
Andreas: Do we more for layering?
c/layout/layout
sean: Extent and origin consumed
by layout.
... No change needed in Section 9.
... Note?
glenn: Problem is we need to
trace all others.
... Glenn will review to decide if we place a note in SDP-US
not in Section 9.
sean: Each feature description gives attributes and elements. Add another table or subsection in Section 9 that articulates those elements and attributes.
glenn: Duplicates material that could become wrong.
sean: Automate?
glenn: Only prose in sections.
Resolved: No change.
glenn: SDP-US editorial issue in Example 2 has wrong font size.
<scribe> ACTION: Glenn Correct font size in Example 2 in SDP-US. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/01/10-tt-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-139 - Correct font size in Example 2 in SDP-US. [on Glenn Adams - due 2013-01-17].
Issue-173?
<trackbot> ISSUE-173 -- presentation semantics of control characters and other unmapped characters -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/173
glenn: No progress on SE issues.
Work on now.
... Not sure we discussed in detail.
... Character without a mapped gliff.
... Handle directly or indirectly in XSL-FO semantics. Need to
check this.
... Display gliff at all? Which is specified?
mike: Need to decide on ones that
alter the flow - carriage return, tab, etc.
... Are they part of the behavior of the region?
... Ignor or substitute?
glenn: Handled by default
semantics of XSL-FO. Describe behavior whitespace handling, new
lines, etc. Default semantics of XSL-FO apply because TTML 1.0
doesn't dictate them.
... We could put information in TTML 1.0 SE.
... Umbrella issue that needs to be separate.
sean: Be clear of what semantics
actually are.
... Need to know what is in TTML 1.0.
glenn: What are in the specification?
mike: Tab, Carriage Return, New Line.
glenn: Line separator and paragraph separator.
sean: Glenn and Mike will quantify where we are at.
mike: Section 7..1.7 is an example where we need to clarify. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html#content-vocabulary-br
glenn: Reference UAX-14. May need to update and look at XSL-FO references in Second Edition.
mike: One or more issues?
glenn: Need another issue specifically related to whitespace handling and line breaking.
Issue-175?
<trackbot> ISSUE-175 -- media type and file extension not registered -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/175
mike: Produced proposed
redlines.
... Material to Sean and Glenn, and to TTWG is sufficient.
Original TTML 1.0 said that encoding should be binary. Should
be UTF-8 and UTF-16.
glenn: Registration information says binary.
mike: XML specific encoding is what we are targeting.
Mike's post: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2012Nov/0036.html
glenn: TTML 1.0 Second Edition
doesn't talk about binary.
... Not in TTML 1.0 either.
mike: Differences between what
was given to IANA, discussion and in TTML 1.0.
... Talk about encoding.
glenn: We don't have constraints for encoding. Recommended for wire encoding.
mike: Optional parameters - application/xml supports a large number of encodings including binary.
glenn: TTML 1.0 doesn't mandate a
concrete encoding. Defines at the infoset with scalar values
irrespective of their encoding.
... Appendix G.
... May differ with what was defined in MIME registration
type.
... Shouldn't constrain.
mike: Presentation engines that
use UTF-8 and -16 gives some preference.
... UTF-8 document with namespace with binary.
glenn: Where is the reference for your concern?
sean: We do have a constraint in
SDP-US.
... Don't understand the issue.
mike: We have an issue on encoding.
glenn: Content conformance has some requirements to application/xml
Issue-197
<trackbot> ISSUE-197 -- charset/encoding unconstrained -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/197
...glenn: Derive encoding from there.
sean: Table discussion until the
issue is understood.
... Mike put a paragraph summarizing your concerns. Sean will
review.
mike: My concern is a document constrained to UTF-8 encoding with a namespace that uses binary. There could be processing issues. There may be other constraints in XML.
glenn: There is no explicit references other than a TTML document at runtime. There could be implicit references.
<mike> here is some more information, including the proposed redline of Annex C: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2013Jan/0005.html
sean: Could use XML
include.
... May not need a concrete MIME type. We need to
comprehensively look at how you create the XML using the
Infoset.
glenn: We probably shouldn't say
anything even though we may want to.
... Annex G could be generalized to namespace and profile
documents.
mike: Need to fix Annex C or
remove entirely. If we keep it, we need to update with comments
from IANA and others (see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2013Jan/0005.html).
... Talk more about encoding.
Action-133?
<trackbot> ACTION-133 -- Mike Dolan to create updated template and summary of media type record for Glenn. -- due 2012-12-13 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/133
<scribe> Closed
Action-136?
<trackbot> ACTION-136 -- Glenn Adams to integrate changes from Action-133 into the TTML 1.0 Second Edition -- due 2013-01-14 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/136
glenn: Still have issue if we need other changes. Do we delete Appendix C?
sean: Table action given discussion.
Issue-199?
<trackbot> ISSUE-199 -- timeExpression to video frame calculation is unclear in some cases -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/199
mike: Contacted by implementers -
timeExpression with frames. How do we calculate the video
frame?
... Cases where different time representations using clock with
frames that result in the same video frame.
... M->1 mapping OK.
... Glenn proposed a different algortihm to go to 1-1 with some
side effects. What is the best approach and give guidance in
TTML 1.0 SE.
... Issue exist for non-integer frame rates with timeExpression
with clock with frames.
glenn: Implementer may have come
to different conclusions. What was our original intent?
... Thread wasn't on public reflector.
sean: Glenn and Sean prepare a discussion document for Jan 17 or 24.
mike: Work with issue and what is on reflector.
plh: Will be gone Jan 17.
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137 of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/layering/layout/ Found ScribeNick: mmartin3 Inferring Scribes: mmartin3 Default Present: mmartin3, glenn, +49.893.aaaa, +1.425.658.aabb, Sean, +1.858.847.aacc, pal, mike, Andreas, Thomas_Bause_Mason, +1.408.771.aadd, mijordan, Plh Present: mmartin3 glenn +49.893.aaaa +1.425.658.aabb Sean +1.858.847.aacc pal mike Andreas Thomas_Bause_Mason +1.408.771.aadd mijordan Plh Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2013Jan/0009.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 10 Jan 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/01/10-tt-minutes.html People with action items: add glenn ttml[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]