W3C

- DRAFT -

AAPI

03 Apr 2012

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Andi Snow-Weaver, Cynthia Shelly, David Bolter
Regrets
Chair
Andi_Snow-Weaver
Scribe
Andi_Snow-Weaver

Contents


Issues and Actions: https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10

CS: meeting to review with IE team on Monday, feedback to Andi on Tuesday

AS: David had raised an issue with aria-valuetext

DB: think we give aria-valuenow precedence over aria-valuetext
... think this is consistent with IA2 which expects numbers

<davidb> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2012JanMar/0212.html

bug 12683 - can close this - text in the UAIG is correct

Action-983

CS: some cells in the table are straight mappings but some have conditions
... need testable statements for those that have conditions

<scribe> ACTION: Andi to get link to the testable statements for David so he can look at some examples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/03-aapi-minutes.html#action01]

draft re-write of section 5.1

http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/wiki/User_Agent_Implementation_Task_Force

AS: new 5.1.1, third bullet - do we still need the language about role="presentation"

CS: not necessary but good for redundant
... can we renumber them and then have a note referring back to them?

DB: what about role="presentation" and tabindex="0"?

<davidb> DB: ok the ARIA doc covers that.

<davidb> DB: need to read offline, might have concern related to relations

AS: what about multiple roles? see 5th bullet under new 5.1.2
... if "presentation" is not the first role, the element would already have been excluded by the rules in the new section 5.1.1

DB: in 5.1.1, could say something like "elements where role="presentation" is the first role, follow the rules in the WAI-ARIA spec"

CS: but what about elements where the first role is not "presentation" and is not mappable - don't we want to treat these as "presentation"?

DB: maybe "presentation" is a special role and cannot be used with other roles

CS: maybe need some instructions to ATs

AS: in 5.1.1, first bullet, "elements with role="presentation" as the first mappable role ..."?

DB: +1

CS: +1
... add a note about what the ATs should do but don't know what it should say

<scribe> ACTION: bug - Cynthia - what should the note to ATs say? [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/03-aapi-minutes.html#action02]

<davidb> I would say "Elements where 'presentation' is the first mappable role provided in the role attribute string.

<davidb> Andi ^

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Andi to get link to the testable statements for David so he can look at some examples [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/03-aapi-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: bug - Cynthia - what should the note to ATs say? [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/04/03-aapi-minutes.html#action02]

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2012/04/16 16:46:15 $