See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 22 March 2012
<scribe> Scribe: glenn
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2012Mar/0033.html
sean: is LC for May for 2nd Ed
reasonable?
... if any new features, will need LC; otherwise, may not need
LC
... thinks there will not be new features, i.e., substantive
changes
<scribe> ... new features will be in TTML.next
glenn: agrees that substantive changes probably not required
-Regrets: miked
sean: only concerns are with
SMPTE timing and profile changes
... however, consensus is that LC probably not needed
... will continue with May timing
ACTION-151?
<trackbot> ACTION-151 does not exist
ACTION-48?
<trackbot> ACTION-48 -- Sean Hayes to elaborate issue-151 points -- due 2012-03-08 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/48
ACTION-50?
<trackbot> ACTION-50 -- Sean Hayes to create wiki page for ttml and subpage for role registry -- due 2012-03-22 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/50
sean: completed action-48 and action-50
ACTION-41?
<trackbot> ACTION-41 -- Sean Hayes to ACTION: Sean to start the Note on how to use TTML with HTML5/CSS [recorded in ]http://www.w3.org/2012/02/09-ttml-minutes.html#action03] -- due 2012-04-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/41
sean: wip, few details to finalize
ACTION-44?
<trackbot> ACTION-44 -- Philippe Le Hégaret to put in place a new errata and ask plh to set up the redirect to it -- due 2012-03-08 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/44
sean: wip
... coordinating with plh
ISSUE-165?
<trackbot> ISSUE-165 -- allowing set to animate more than one attribute. -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/165
sean: in trying to simulate
pop-on style, would like to simplify by specifying multiple
attributes in a single set element
... or could have set reference a style element in order to
animate entire style set referenced through style element
glenn: this would be TTML.next
sean: yes
ISSUE-151?
<trackbot> ISSUE-151 -- Clarify syncbase in SMPTE continuous mode -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/151
<Sean> hello?
sean: was smpte mode intended to be marker based for both continuous and discountinuous cases?
glenn: yes, smpte timebase was intended to be marker mode irrespective of value of ttp:markerMode value
sean: if intent was that
smpte/continuous is intended to be marker mode, then we need to
clarify spec; if not, then we need to remove
... suggests that glenn closely read the current spec text,
then writes a CP to address this issue
... will need to deal with the problem that (informative) notes
in 6.2.6 (ttp:markerMode) seem to be specifying normative
semantics that should be present in normative text
ACTION glenn to review and draft CP for resolving ISSUE-151
<trackbot> Created ACTION-51 - Review and draft CP for resolving ISSUE-151 [on Glenn Adams - due 2012-03-29].
ISSUE-154?
<trackbot> ISSUE-154 -- Clarify the endsync behavior -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/154
sean: simpler than 151, but still
may need change to spec
... problem is that we don't specify endsync, which has a
default of 'last'
... for most part this works, but may not work in marker
mode
... problem is that parent needs to stay alive until children
see their end markers
... could fix by changing default for endsync behavior to
'all'
... in fact this default could be applied throughout
... proposes introducing semantics that endsync behavior is
'all', at least for marker mode, but maybe for all modes
... will write CP to this effect
ACTION sean to draft CP for resolving ISSUE-154
<trackbot> Created ACTION-52 - Draft CP for resolving ISSUE-154 [on Sean Hayes - due 2012-03-29].
ISSUE-162?
<trackbot> ISSUE-162 -- profile discrepancy -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/issues/162
mike: does profile specify a document profile or a processing profile?
sean: believes it is fairly clear in spec
mike: industry is not clear on this, so perhaps needs more explicit language to this effect
sean: ... perhaps we should (could) add new mechanisms to support specifying document profile, but suggest this be TTML.next action
mike: most important that intent is clear
sean: would be reasonable to add more clarifying text/examples/etc.
ACTION glenn to address or draft CP to resolve ISSUE-156
<trackbot> Created ACTION-53 - Address or draft CP to resolve ISSUE-156 [on Glenn Adams - due 2012-03-29].
sean: any action to create new
document profile should be introduced with a new issue
... what happens if profile refers to a feature we don't
define?
... when we introduce new feature designators in future, then
what is processor behavior for older processors?
glenn: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/raw-file/tip/ttml10/spec/ttaf1-dfxp.html#conformance-generic-processor
see item (3)
mike: if no profile is specified,
then processor should not reject (for that reason)
... in other words, should be optional
ACTION glenn to clarify behavior regarding processor behavior when encountering feature for which no used or required is indicated
<trackbot> Created ACTION-54 - Clarify behavior regarding processor behavior when encountering feature for which no used or required is indicated [on Glenn Adams - due 2012-03-29].
adjourned
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/1st Ed/2nd Ed/ Succeeded: s/finalizee/finalize/ Found Scribe: glenn Inferring ScribeNick: glenn Default Present: sean_, glenn, +49.893.aaaa, +44.147.383.aabb, johnb, andreas, +1.858.882.aacc, miked, sean Present: sean_ glenn +49.893.aaaa +44.147.383.aabb johnb andreas +1.858.882.aacc miked sean Regrets: miked Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2012Mar/0032.html Found Date: 22 Mar 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/03/22-tt-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]