See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: pchampin
<scribe> scribenick: pchampin
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
close ACTION-454
<trackbot> ACTION-454 Extract atomic JASOM responses closed
close ACTION-455
<trackbot> ACTION-455 Review the Media RSS, TexFeed and YouTube JSON files closed
close ACTION-458
<trackbot> ACTION-458 Update implementation report closed
close action-459
<trackbot> ACTION-459 Send tests for general behavior test cases closed
close action-461
<trackbot> ACTION-461 Check format of implementation report with thierry closed
close action-463
<trackbot> ACTION-463 to review the genetal tests closed
close action-464
<trackbot> ACTION-464 Review the XMP DRF and TTL files closed
<tmichel> The implementation report says that all tests are passed at least by two implementations
<tmichel> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/implementation-report.html
tmichel: the implementation
report is almost done
... we have fullfilled the criteria: 2 implementations for each
test
<tmichel> REmains an issue about the General tests cases which some are missing links: G1, G5,G6,G7
<tmichel> Werner proposed
<tmichel> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2012Mar/0022.html
<tmichel> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/implementation-report.html#L549
tmichel: I've added the suggested column "relevant parameters" (see URL above)
werner: it's good; for G5 it's
tricky to fill this column
... needs to provide several URLs that are reachable for the
implementation,
... so will differ from an implementation to another
tmichel: we need to be able to answer the question "how can you test without a test file?"
<wbailer> werner: proposed solution: state in needed parameters just that two metadata sources need to be created
<wbailer> ... list actual URIs of the sources used for the implementations that passed the test
tmichel: next problem: some cases have no input
werner: actually, the files that
are currently linked are too specific, they are just
examples
... it would be less confusing to direct the text to *any* of
the input files provided below
... the test is not to work with those specific files only, but
with any file
tmichel: propose to remove the links in G5, G6, G7
werner: could be done as well for G2, G3, G4, with a note explaining that any input file can be used
RESOLUTION: remove the link for tests G5, G6, G7
werner: the file for G2 is pathological, but G2 should also work with a valid file
pchampin: that would be two variants of the same test
tmichel: so for G2, G3, G4 we keep the link as they are, add a new test for G2 with a correct input (non-pathological)
werner: another issue: note #2
below the table, about the JSON response
... should we instead provide the three possible answers
... with a note explaining that either one is a valid
response?
pchampin: I agree
tmichel: something else that may
raise a question: implementation 2 & 3 are from the same
university and research center
... not really a problem for most tests, as they are fullfilled
by either 1 and 3 or 2 and 3
... except for the "General behaviour tests"
... To be on the safe side, it would be better that
Implementation 1 fullfill them.
... Eitherways, we could be told "implementation 2 and 3 are
actually the same, so those tests are passed by only one
implementation"
werner: it should not be too
complicated for Implementation 1 to fullfill them, actually it
really should
... I'll check with Florian & Sebastian
tmichel: once all those changes are done, I'll ask the team (during next call) if we agree to ask for the transition to PR
<tmichel> API PR version
<tmichel> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/PR/
tmichel: I will check with Florian, but I don't think we received any comment during CR
<tmichel> Action Thierry to check with Florian if there are updates to be done in the PR version
<trackbot> Created ACTION-465 - Check with Florian if there are updates to be done in the PR version [on Thierry Michel - due 2012-03-27].
<tmichel> Additional mappings
<tmichel> a- Schema.org maping first draft provided by JP.
<tmichel> ACTION mari- Carmen to review the Schema.org maping
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - mari-
JP provided a first version of the SChema.org mapping
<tmichel> ACTION mari-Carmen to review the Schema.org maping
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - mari-Carmen
<tmichel> 4.Issue with DC XPath Expressions
<tmichel> Additional mappings provided by Sebastian for YouTube
<tmichel> ACTION Wonsuk to update the new YouTube mapping table
<trackbot> Created ACTION-466 - Update the new YouTube mapping table [on WonSuk Lee - due 2012-03-27].
<tmichel> sorry
<tmichel> Issue with YouTube XPath Expressions
tmichel: do we have to update the mapping table, or do we have to update the examples?
werner: as far as I understood, this requires a change in the mapping table
<tmichel> if it is the Xpath expressions in the ontology REC, it needs an errata
tmichel: in that case we need an erratum for that
<tmichel> ACTION Wonsuk to review the Xpath Expressions in the YOU Tube mapping table
<trackbot> Created ACTION-467 - Review the Xpath Expressions in the YOU Tube mapping table [on WonSuk Lee - due 2012-03-27].
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/proposed/werner: proposed/ Succeeded: s/two possible/three possible/ Found Scribe: pchampin Inferring ScribeNick: pchampin Found ScribeNick: pchampin Present: thierry pierre-antoine werner WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: florian, mari-carmen, daniel) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Mari-Carmen, Florian, Daniel Regrets: Mari-Carmen Florian Daniel Got date from IRC log name: 20 Mar 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/03/20-mediaann-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]