11:01:56 RRSAgent has joined #mediaann 11:01:56 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/03/20-mediaann-irc 11:02:00 zakim, this is mawg 11:02:00 ok, wbailer; that matches IA_MAWG()7:00AM 11:02:14 zakim, who is here? 11:02:14 On the phone I see ??P0, wbailer 11:02:15 rrsagent, make logs public 11:02:16 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, wbailer, tmichel, trackbot 11:03:38 meeting: MAWG telco 11:03:41 chair: thierry 11:03:48 regrets: florian, mari-carmen 11:04:11 pchampin has joined #mediaann 11:04:40 +??P3 11:04:53 zakim, ?PP3 is me 11:04:53 sorry, pchampin, I do not recognize a party named '?PP3' 11:05:13 zakim, ??P3 is me 11:05:13 +pchampin; got it 11:05:22 regrets+ daniel 11:05:35 present: thierry, pierre-antoine, werner 11:05:37 regrets: Mari-Carmen, Florian, Daniel 11:06:17 scribe: pchampin 11:06:26 scribenick: pchampin 11:06:35 topic: open actions 11:06:50 topic: Open Actions 11:07:03 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open 11:07:40 close ACTION-454 11:07:40 ACTION-454 Extract atomic JASOM responses closed 11:07:53 close ACTION-455 11:07:53 ACTION-455 Review the Media RSS, TexFeed and YouTube JSON files closed 11:08:09 close ACTION-458 11:08:09 ACTION-458 Update implementation report closed 11:08:24 close action-459 11:08:24 ACTION-459 Send tests for general behavior test cases closed 11:09:07 close action-461 11:09:07 ACTION-461 Check format of implementation report with thierry closed 11:09:28 close action-463 11:09:28 ACTION-463 to review the genetal tests closed 11:09:46 close action-464 11:09:46 ACTION-464 Review the XMP DRF and TTL files closed 11:09:52 topic:Moving The API spec to PR. 11:10:08 The implementation report says that all tests are passed at least by two implementations 11:10:08 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/implementation-report.html 11:10:26 tmichel: the implementation report is almost done 11:10:38 ... we have fullfilled the criteria: 2 implementations for each test 11:10:57 REmains an issue about the General tests cases which some are missing links: G1, G5,G6,G7 11:10:57 Werner proposed 11:10:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2012Mar/0022.html 11:11:18 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/implementation-report.html#L549 11:12:03 tmichel: I've added the suggested column "relevant parameters" (see URL above) 11:12:54 werner: it's good; for G5 it's tricky to fill this column 11:13:19 ... needs to provide several URLs that are reachable for the implementation, 11:13:39 ... so will differ from an implementation to another 11:14:10 tmichel: we need to be able to answer the question "how can you test without a test file?" 11:15:13 proposed solution: state in needed parameters just that two metadata sources need to be created 11:15:29 ... list actual URIs of the sources used for the implementations that passed the test 11:16:23 s/proposed/werner: proposed/ 11:16:35 tmichel: next problem: some cases have no input 11:18:21 werner: actually, the files that are currently linked are too specific, they are just examples 11:18:46 ... it would be less confusing to direct the text to *any* of the input files provided below 11:20:16 ... the test is not to work with those specific files only, but with any file 11:21:03 tmichel: propose to remove the links in G5, G6, G7 11:21:39 werner: could be done as well for G2, G3, G4, with a note explaining that any input file can be used 11:21:58 RESOLVED: remove the link for tests G5, G6, G7 11:25:21 werner: the file for G2 is pathological, but G2 should also work with a valid file 11:25:33 pchampin: that would be two variants of the same test 11:26:10 tmichel: so for G2, G3, G4 we keep the link as they are, add a new test for G2 with a correct input (non-pathological) 11:28:58 werner: another issue: note #2 below the table, about the JSON response 11:29:15 ... should we instead provide the two possible answers 11:29:36 s/two possible/three possible/ 11:30:18 ... with a note explaining that either one is a valid response? 11:30:22 pchampin: I agree 11:31:37 tmichel: something else that may raise a question: implementation 2 & 3 are from the same university and research center 11:32:10 ... not really a problem for most tests, as they are fullfilled by either 1 and 3 or 2 and 3 11:32:22 ... except for the "General behaviour tests" 11:32:46 ... To be on the safe side, it would be better that Implementation 1 fullfill them. 11:33:21 ... Eitherways, we could be told "implementation 2 and 3 are actually the same, so those tests are passed by only one implementation" 11:33:40 werner: it should not be too complicated for Implementation 1 to fullfill them, actually it really should 11:33:52 ... I'll check with Florian & Sebastian 11:34:58 tmichel: once all those changes are done, I'll ask the team (during next call) if we agree to ask for the transition to PR 11:34:59 API PR version 11:35:01 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/PR/ 11:36:09 tmichel: I will check with Florian, but I don't think we received any comment during CR 11:36:18 Action Thierry to check with Florian if there are updates to be done in the PR version 11:36:18 Created ACTION-465 - Check with Florian if there are updates to be done in the PR version [on Thierry Michel - due 2012-03-27]. 11:36:29 Additional mappings 11:36:35 topic: additional mappings 11:36:38 a- Schema.org maping first draft provided by JP. 11:37:37 ACTION mari- Carmen to review the Schema.org maping 11:37:37 Sorry, couldn't find user - mari- 11:37:38 JP provided a first version of the SChema.org mapping 11:37:55 ACTION mari-Carmen to review the Schema.org maping 11:37:55 Sorry, couldn't find user - mari-Carmen 11:38:23 4.Issue with DC XPath Expressions 11:38:51 Additional mappings provided by Sebastian for YouTube 11:39:45 ACTION Wonsuk to update the new YouTube mapping table 11:39:45 Created ACTION-466 - Update the new YouTube mapping table [on WonSuk Lee - due 2012-03-27]. 11:39:58 topic:.Issue with DC XPath Expressions 11:40:09 sorry 11:40:32 Issue with YouTube XPath Expressions 11:41:25 tmichel: do we have to update the mapping table, or do we have to update the examples? 11:41:49 werner: as far as I understood, this requires a change in the mapping table 11:41:54 if it is the Xpath expressions in the ontology REC, it needs an errata 11:42:02 tmichel: in that case we need an erratum for that 11:42:32 ACTION Wonsuk to review the Xpath Expressions in the YOU Tube mapping table 11:42:32 Created ACTION-467 - Review the Xpath Expressions in the YOU Tube mapping table [on WonSuk Lee - due 2012-03-27]. 11:49:22 -wbailer 11:49:29 rrsagent, draft the minutes 11:49:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/03/20-mediaann-minutes.html pchampin 11:50:17 -pchampin 12:05:00 disconnecting the lone participant, ??P0, in IA_MAWG()7:00AM 12:05:01 IA_MAWG()7:00AM has ended 12:05:01 Attendees were wbailer, pchampin 13:05:18 Zakim has left #mediaann 14:02:58 tmichel has joined #mediaann