See also: IRC log
<olivier> (http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements)
<olivier> (http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Spec_Differences)
<jernoble> hi oliver!
<olivier> Scribe: Jussi
<olivier> ScribeNick: quinnirill
<tmichel> lots of echo ...
<jernoble> -Jer
<olivier> http://www.doodle.com/i4pecambe7a5az64
Olivier: the time that works best for most people is 7pm GMT
Everyone: silence
... agreed
<olivier> RESOLUTION: meetings will be 7pm GMT mondays from now on
<olivier> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Spec_Differences
Olivier: Al has been editing the
spec differences document, is likely to contact group members
for help
... if you want to start adding to it, talk with Al or go
directly to the wiki
Olivier: there will be a more
formal vote about the subject
... had a chat with James Wei (intel) about the priority of the
use cases
<olivier> James thought all except 3, 8, 11 and 12 are high priority)
Olivier: based on whether the use cases are basic requirements or higher level
Doug: we should add placeholders for the priorities in the wiki
<olivier> ACTION: olivier to add placeholders for priorities in UC wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/02/13-audio-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-32 - Add placeholders for priorities in UC wiki [on Olivier Thereaux - due 2012-02-20].
Doug: thinks the priorities
should be those that are depended on by the other groups, such
as WebRTC
... and games, to cover use cases that are currently gapped by
Flash
Olivier: mostly agree
... clear demand on UC1 (WebRTC) & UC2 (developers saying
they need it)
Doug: we should either split out
use cases to simple and complex to prioritize or (??)
... or group the use cases by requirements
jer: audio visualization also in demand
<olivier> Jussi: not much to add. Most demos are either using audio data api or web audio api. a lot of processing and visualisation
<tmichel> seems quite obvious that UC1 is priority one.
Phil: on the use cases for the
online music, you wouldn't have to standardize much, but you
could use existing standars, such as MIDI
... XMF is an extended midi file standard, used in phones
<tmichel> +1 for UC1 and UC2.
Phil: for basic use cases, like polyphone ringtones and simple music production, standard MIDI is often enough
Doug: W3C refrains from referencing to specifications that aren't royalty-free
Olivier: based on what I'm hearing, UC1, UC2, UC7 seem important
Everyone: welcome Gabriel
<philburk> MIDI, GeneralMIDI, XMF and DLS2 are royalty free
Olivier: these three use cases cover most of the ground, if you exclude (scenario-wise) complex synthesis
Olivier proposes we focus on these three use cases and then split on complexity
<olivier> RESOLVED: to see how large the overlap of requirements between UC 1,2 and 7 is - and split based them in simple/advanced if needed
?: Do we need a use case for experimenting on raw audio processing
Doug: we could make a UC for it
Phil: useful for teaching audio, etc, not very mainstream
(was that Al?)
Everyone: no objections to adjourning early
Olivier: adjourned, thanks
Everyone: bye
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/split/split based/ Succeeded: s/?:/Phil:/ Found Scribe: Jussi Found ScribeNick: quinnirill Default Present: jernoble, quinnirill, Doug_Schepers, [IPcaller], olivier, thierry, Jer, Gabriel Present: jernoble quinnirill Doug_Schepers [IPcaller] olivier thierry Jer Gabriel Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0237.html Got date from IRC log name: 13 Feb 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/02/13-audio-minutes.html People with action items: olivier WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]