W3C

- DRAFT -

TV Profile Task Force

06 Feb 2012

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Giuseppe, Nilo_Mitra, MarkW, Russell, Philipp, Johnsim, yosuke, Josh_Soref, Yoshiharu_Dewa
Regrets
Kaz(only_on_IRC)
Chair
Giuseppe (opera)
Scribe
Johnsim

Contents


<scribe> Scribe: Johnsim

<ph> can we identify who's on the call? or is this known already?

<giuseppe> ph, are you on the call?

<ph> yes

<giuseppe> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Agenda_Telco_6/2/2012

<inserted> scribenick: johnsim

Discuss charter for new task force

<giuseppe> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Charter

Any comments on the goals?

Watson: discussion on email is target of the profile and reason for profile - features or devices that support a set of features.
... device not support all the features - which is the typical problem with TV type devices

Giuseppe: two parts - pure profiling part - maturity of the spec - depends on the group - reach a point where we can mandate a profile - if able to score X then you are in this category of devices.
... perhaps word "profile" - device and feature profiling.

Watson: word "profile" is correct if features all selected from other documents
... versus defining new features - which would be specification work

Giuseppe: would not make sense to mix the two - if nothing complete enough to be used then we go to the working groups and get the external document complete and we can reference from the profile
... The profile should not contain the specification but the reference, but if there is no specification, go out to the other groups to get spec done

Watson: : range of devices and not just TV; but because TV have limited processing capacility that we need this work. and some additional capabilities, like tuners, so it all gets down to device capabilities, i think

Giuseppe: parts of these document apply to all devices

Watson: things generic (like DRM) being discussed in other activities. if all devices had same capabilities we would not need profiles
... generally applicable features should be dealt with elsewhere. it is only because devices cannot met all features we need this profiling at all

Meeting Schedule

Giuseppe: may need calls every 2nd or 3rd week - or once a month - if all the discussion on the list easy for all to participate

<yosuke> +1

+1

Giuseppe: once a month? Or perhaps don't need calls and call for it when we need it

Philipp: once a month. Check point once a month is good.

Giuseppe: once a month

Bug Tracking

Giuseppe: don't have project yet [in Bugzilla-- the proposed bug tracker]. will announce it when ready. and in monthly call go through the bugs and get this discussed. does this work for everybody?

Profile-Spec

Giuseppe: last thing on agenda http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/tvprofile/tv.html

AOB

Giuseppe: any other business?
... keep discussing on the list, call on first Monday of the month. Thanks.

<Josh_Soref> trackbot, end meeting

<kaz> ah

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2012/02/06 17:06:04 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: i/Discuss/scribenick: johnsim
Succeeded: s/hello//
Succeeded: s/finally I connected..//
Succeeded: s/kaz, no problem//
Succeeded: s/will ph join?//
Succeeded: s/Hi, Giuseppe!//
Succeeded: s/Hi yosuke//
Succeeded: s/nope//
Succeeded: s/could you please check who is on?//
Succeeded: s/no sorry//
Succeeded: s/Mark Watson -/MarkWatson:/
Succeeded: s/Mark Watson:/MarkWatson:/
Succeeded: s/Giuseppe -/Giuseppe:/
Succeeded: s/Giuseppe -/Giuseppe:/
Succeeded: s/Mark Watson:/MarkWatson:/
Succeeded: s/Giuseppe -/Giuseppe:/
Succeeded: s/versus defining/... versus defining/
Succeeded: s/The profile should not contain/... The profile should not contain/
Succeeded: s/Watson -/Watson:/
Succeeded: s/watson/Watson:/
Succeeded: s/MarkWatson:/Watson:/g
Succeeded: i/need calls/Topic: Meeting Schedule
Succeeded: s/yet/yet [in Bugzilla-- the proposed bug tracker]/
Succeeded: s/sorry I dropped//
Succeeded: s/calling in again//
Succeeded: i/may need calls/Topic: Meeting Schedule
Succeeded: i/last thing/Topic: Profile-Spec
Succeeded: i/any other/Topic: AOB
Succeeded: s/Discuss charter for new task force/Topic: Discuss charter for new task force/
Succeeded: s/Giuseppe - two parts/Giuseppe: two parts/
Succeeded: s/+1/Johnsim: +1/
FAILED: s/Johnsim:_+1.289.261.aaaa/Josh_Soref/
Succeeded: s/Johnsim: +1.289.261.aaaa/Josh_Soref/
Succeeded: s|s/Johnsim:_+1.289.261.aaaa/Josh_Soref/||
Succeeded: s/Josh_Soref, Josh_Soref/Josh_Soref/
Succeeded: s/[IPcaller]/YoshiharuDewa/
Succeeded: s/giuseppe (opera)/Giuseppe (opera)/
Found Scribe: Johnsim
Found ScribeNick: johnsim

WARNING: Replacing list of attendees.
Old list: YoshiharuDewa Nilo_Mitra MarkW Russell Philipp Johnsim yosuke Josh_Soref giuseppe
New list: [IPcaller] Nilo_Mitra MarkW Russell Philipp Johnsim yosuke +1.289.261.aaaa Josh_Soref giuseppe

Default Present: [IPcaller], Nilo_Mitra, MarkW, Russell, Philipp, Johnsim, yosuke, +1.289.261.aaaa, Josh_Soref, giuseppe
Present: Giuseppe Nilo_Mitra MarkW Russell Philipp Johnsim yosuke Josh_Soref Yoshiharu_Dewa
Regrets: Kaz(only_on_IRC)
Got date from IRC log name: 06 Feb 2012
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/02/06-webtv-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]