See also: IRC log
<ericP> we need to make hasty test decisions, potentially before we publish the CR, if we want the CR to point at submission instructions
<ericP> D[1;3Coops
Michel: Discuss Clinical Decision
Support group
... also Canadian opportunities
... Cinical Decision Support task force
... work assess how semweb can support CDS
... task force focus on looking at interactions between linked
data, other cds platforms
<ericP> i'm in a meeting now, but am monitoring IRC and interested in any notes captured abou CDS
Matthias: W3C people might want
to be on board with this
... also alternate with the TMO
<ericP> W3C people want to be on board (have heard multiple parties interested)
Matthias: unique perspective on
this problem with this group
... also powerful tool set here
... should advertise better
Michel: Chairs have call on Thurs 10-11
:)
scribe: early next week we
unveil
... people have indicated that they are interested in CDS
here
... E-Z to participate!
... Suggest that we narrow here, from TM to
Pharmacogenomics
... TM would happen at a higher level
... HCLS call once a month will focus on TM
... 1st 3rd Thu PGx
... 2nd 4th CDS
Matthias: Addition to PGx
pharmacogenomics
... Drug-interaction task force a little broader than Pgx
Michel: Will take this +1 back to the chairs. Roll-out for Feb
<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp
Michel: 1500 payers 10K
entries(?)
... first challenge that I have seen
... maybe they have data(!)
<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/data
Michel: even if we don't predict, we might develop a demo linkedata project over this
Q: We might be able to add linked-data *into* the competition
<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/details/Rules
Michel: (pondering the rules
here...)
... maybe we just have to ask them in an email
(?): Data that we bring in would add value for them
Matthias: Offerring raw data in linked data form might be good for them
<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/forums/t/349/external-data
Matthias: Large group of people in this competition; they might find out if they like RDF etc
Michel: Look through the forum
for other people talking data
... Canadian project, national framework
... every province has its own standard; clinical level there
is mish-mash
... so set up standard descriptions of health data, plus
exchange with security
<michel> http://www.imaginenationchallenge.ca/
Michel: 4 different
challenges
... health information is interesting, description is pretty
open
... clinical synopsis reporting
Bosse: Interesting challenge here, do we have the resources?
Michel: Maybe discuss on Tues
meeting
... will bring it up on the HCLS call. Maybe there are other
challenges
... maybe HCLS should look at challenges!
... Genome Canada competition $10M/project
... would like to know about partnership opportunites for
this
... PGx of organ Xplant; also EHRs to capture data, Canadian
angle
Matthias: One of use cases for pgx is organ xplant and rejection
Michel: PGx paper.
... problem is, needs focus; Matthias discussion
... demonstrate classification of patients with OWL.
... can OWL obviate the requirement for more complicated
CDS?
Matthais: Correct. Should also
look at other RDF options
... sparql inferencing by TopQuadrant is possibility
... can form relatively complex (inferences?)
<matthias_samwald> http://code.google.com/p/translationalmedicineontology/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fusage_examples
Matthais: made CDS table w OWL and w sparql
<scribe> ... done on top of TMO
UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: outcome: grew a
bit disappointed w the reasoning
... so spin and sparql are now a higher priority
Michel: Elaborate?
Matthias: Basically, qualified
cardinality description; cannot infer that (?) consists of
exactly 2 dna regions
... probably in OWL full and not DL
... tried to introduce complex property
(then combined w cardinality restrictions - boom!)
scribe: Will work better if I try
this with SPIN
... using SPIN leads to modelling considerations; individuals
are connected
... using spin favors a modelling style of using individuals
rather than classes
... easier then to have individual for human, individual for
genetic (variety?)
(very insightful discussion from Matthais!)
Michel: Maybe record this and
write paper, about all this experience
... prep for OWLED in May
ericP is here!
ericP: Need actionable information, when we can demo action from the computer
<michel> scribenick bobP
rssagent, draft minutes
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/automate/alternate/ No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: bobP Inferring Scribes: bobP WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Bosse IPcaller Matthais Matthias Michel P55 aaaa aabb bbalsa epichler ericP hcls2 joined matthias_samwald You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting Got date from IRC log name: 26 Jan 2012 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-hcls2-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]