<ericP> we need to make hasty test decisions, potentially before we publish the CR, if we want the CR to point at submission instructions

<ericP> Doops

Michel: Discuss Clinical Decision Support group
... also Canadian opportunities
... Cinical Decision Support task force
... work assess how semweb can support CDS
... task force focus on looking at interactions between linked data, other cds platforms

<ericP> i'm in a meeting now, but am monitoring IRC and interested in any notes captured abou CDS

Matthias: W3C people might want to be on board with this
... also alternate with the TMO

<ericP> W3C people want to be on board (have heard multiple parties interested)

Matthias: unique perspective on this problem with this group
... also powerful tool set here
... should advertise better

Michel: Chairs have call on Thurs 10-11

:)

scribe: early next week we unveil
... people have indicated that they are interested in CDS here
... E-Z to participate!
... Suggest that we narrow here, from TM to Pharmacogenomics
... TM would happen at a higher level
... HCLS call once a month will focus on TM
... 1st 3rd Thu PGx
... 2nd 4th CDS

Matthias: Addition to PGx pharmacogenomics
... Drug-interaction task force a little broader than Pgx

Michel: Will take this +1 back to the chairs. Roll-out for Feb

<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp

Michel: 1500 payers 10K entries(?)
... first challenge that I have seen
... maybe they have data(!)

<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/data

Michel: even if we don't predict, we might develop a demo linkedata project over this

Q: We might be able to add linked-data *into* the competition

<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/details/Rules

Michel: (pondering the rules here...)
... maybe we just have to ask them in an email

(?): Data that we bring in would add value for them

Matthias: Offerring raw data in linked data form might be good for them

<michel> http://www.heritagehealthprize.com/c/hhp/forums/t/349/external-data

Matthias: Large group of people in this competition; they might find out if they like RDF etc

Michel: Look through the forum for other people talking data
... Canadian project, national framework
... every province has its own standard; clinical level there is mish-mash
... so set up standard descriptions of health data, plus exchange with security

<michel> http://www.imaginenationchallenge.ca/

Michel: 4 different challenges
... health information is interesting, description is pretty open
... clinical synopsis reporting

Bosse: Interesting challenge here, do we have the resources?

Michel: Maybe discuss on Tues meeting
... will bring it up on the HCLS call. Maybe there are other challenges
... maybe HCLS should look at challenges!
... Genome Canada competition $10M/project
... would like to know about partnership opportunites for this
... PGx of organ Xplant; also EHRs to capture data, Canadian angle

Matthias: One of use cases for pgx is organ xplant and rejection

Michel: PGx paper.
... problem is, needs focus; Matthias discussion
... demonstrate classification of patients with OWL.
... can OWL obviate the requirement for more complicated CDS?

Matthais: Correct. Should also look at other RDF options
... sparql inferencing by TopQuadrant is possibility
... can form relatively complex (inferences?)

<matthias_samwald> http://code.google.com/p/translationalmedicineontology/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fusage_examples

Matthais: made CDS table w OWL and w sparql

<scribe> ... done on top of TMO

UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: outcome: grew a bit disappointed w the reasoning
... so spin and sparql are now a higher priority

Michel: Elaborate?

Matthias: Basically, qualified cardinality description; cannot infer that (?) consists of exactly 2 dna regions
... probably in OWL full and not DL
... tried to introduce complex property

(then combined w cardinality restrictions - boom!)

scribe: Will work better if I try this with SPIN
... using SPIN leads to modelling considerations; individuals are connected
... using spin favors a modelling style of using individuals rather than classes
... easier then to have individual for human, individual for genetic (variety?)

(very insightful discussion from Matthais!)

Michel: Maybe record this and write paper, about all this experience
... prep for OWLED in May

ericP is here!

ericP: Need actionable information, when we can demo action from the computer

<michel> scribenick bobP

rssagent, draft minutes

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136  of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/automate/alternate/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: bobP
Inferring Scribes: bobP

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Bosse IPcaller Matthais Matthias Michel P55 aaaa aabb bbalsa epichler ericP hcls2 joined matthias_samwald
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Got date from IRC log name: 26 Jan 2012
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-hcls2-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report