ISSUE-88: different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content

different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
Nick Doty
Opened on:
2011-09-23
Description:
(This issue was not created during the meeting purely due to an issue with an IRC client.)
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  2. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  3. post-call housekeeping & upcoming discussions (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
  4. agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
  5. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-01-23)
  6. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-01-20)
  7. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-01-13)
  8. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
  9. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-11)
  10. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
  11. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-01-11)
  12. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-10)
  13. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-10)
  14. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-09)
  15. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from cedric@laurant.org on 2012-01-07)
  16. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
  17. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-07)
  18. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-01-06)
  19. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-06)
  20. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
  21. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-01-06)
  22. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-06)
  23. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-01-06)
  24. RE: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-01-06)
  25. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
  26. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
  27. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
  28. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-05)
  29. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-01-05)
  30. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-01-05)
  31. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
  32. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
  33. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-01-04)
  34. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from singer@apple.com on 2012-01-04)
  35. Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
  36. Re: Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-12-23)
  37. Draft Text on First Parties and Third Parties (ACTION-34, ISSUE-10, ISSUE-26, ISSUE-88) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-12-22)
  38. Re: Compliance issues (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-07)
  39. Compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
  40. Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
  41. Re: Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2011-11-09)
  42. Agenda for 2011-11-09 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-11-08)
  43. Draft Language on Interaction with Third-Party Content (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-10-26)
  44. agenda for wednesday call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-18)
  45. tracking-ISSUE-88: different rules for impression of and interaction with 3rd-party ads/content [Tracking Preference Expression Definitions and Compliance] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-23)

Related notes:

- if there's no branding, is it reasonable to promote to a first party, so long as the user knows it's a different party?

- does the branding have to be understood to map to a specific company, or just be branded at all?

- what about widgets that are blending into the page itself?

Aleecia McDonald, 11 Apr 2012, 19:20:35

Closed during 18 April call: ad impressions -> 3rd party, ad interaction -> 1st party. This is handled through issue-10.

Aleecia McDonald, 18 Apr 2012, 17:15:56

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $