ISSUE-62: The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context

The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)

Raised by:

Opened on:

2011-09-22

Description:

A piece of content might be retrieved from a site as a first-party resource request or be embedded within the context of an iframe as a third-party subrequest. Should we attempt to have the browser communicate that context to any scripts or subrequests within the embedded content?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
2. TPE removing first vs third-party issues (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
3. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
4. Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
5. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
6. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
7. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
8. RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
9. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
10. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
11. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
12. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
13. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
14. RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
15. first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
16. ISSUE-62: The browser or embedding site could send an architectural signal to an embedded iframe so it knows it's in a 3rd-party context (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)

Related notes:

Display change log