ISSUE-31: Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions)

Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions)

State:
PENDING REVIEW
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-09-21
Description:
This issue was resolved by a decision to maintain the existing text from the June 2013 draft.
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
  2. Re: Data minimization (ISSUE-31) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2014-07-16)
  3. Data minimization (ISSUE-31) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-07-14)
  4. Agenda for July 9 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-07-08)
  5. Re: Agenda for June 25 TPWG call (from sstamm@mozilla.com on 2014-06-25)
  6. Agenda for June 25 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-24)
  7. Agenda for June 18 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-17)
  8. Re: Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-10)
  9. Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-09)
  10. Agenda for June 4 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-02)
  11. Agenda for DNT Weekly Call for May 29 (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-28)
  12. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
  13. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  14. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
  15. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
  16. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  17. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  18. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  19. ISSUE-31: Framing and text structure (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-09)
  20. RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
  21. Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
  22. Updated response to Aleecia's Template, Issue-10, Issue-17, Issue-19, Issue-22, Issue-24, Issue-25, Issue-31, Issue-49, Issue-73 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-04-07)
  23. deeper look at agenda items (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-07)
  24. Revised template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
  25. template for parties and business uses (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-28)
  26. RE: RE: FW: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-21)
  27. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
  28. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-15)
  29. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-15)
  30. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-14)
  31. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-14)
  32. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-13)
  33. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-13)
  34. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from K.Joe@esomar.org on 2012-02-13)
  35. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
  36. RE: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-12)
  37. Re: ACTION-75: Write-up a hybrid of Do Not Profile and Do Not Cross-Site Track (from rob@blaeu.com on 2012-02-12)
  38. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
  39. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mgroman@networkadvertising.org on 2012-02-10)
  40. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-02-10)
  41. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  42. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
  43. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
  44. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-10)
  45. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  46. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  47. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-02-10)
  48. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-10)
  49. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  50. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-10)
  51. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  52. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  53. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  54. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  55. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
  56. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  57. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  58. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  59. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-10)
  60. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  61. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  62. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  63. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  64. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-02-10)
  65. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-10)
  66. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-02-10)
  67. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  68. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-10)
  69. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-10)
  70. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-10)
  71. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
  72. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
  73. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  74. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-09)
  75. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  76. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-09)
  77. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-09)
  78. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-09)
  79. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-09)
  80. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  81. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  82. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-09)
  83. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  84. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-09)
  85. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-09)
  86. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-09)
  87. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-08)
  88. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-08)
  89. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  90. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  91. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  92. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  93. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  94. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  95. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-02-08)
  96. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
  97. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  98. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-08)
  99. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  100. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  101. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  102. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  103. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-02-08)
  104. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-02-07)
  105. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
  106. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-07)
  107. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
  108. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-07)
  109. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-07)
  110. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-07)
  111. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-06)
  112. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-02-06)
  113. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-02-06)
  114. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-02-06)
  115. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-06)
  116. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
  117. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  118. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-06)
  119. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  120. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  121. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
  122. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-06)
  123. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-02-05)
  124. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
  125. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-05)
  126. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
  127. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-05)
  128. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-04)
  129. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-03)
  130. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
  131. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-02)
  132. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-02)
  133. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
  134. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-02-02)
  135. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
  136. RE: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-02)
  137. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
  138. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
  139. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-01)
  140. Re: Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from blsaws@gmail.com on 2012-02-01)
  141. Deciding Exceptions (ISSUE-23, ISSUE-24, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-31, ISSUE-34, ISSUE-49) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-01)
  142. Draft: Issue 31, Minimization - to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions) (from Sue.Glueck@microsoft.com on 2011-12-22)
  143. RE: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-12)
  144. Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-12-12)
  145. RE: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-12)
  146. Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-12-12)
  147. Re: [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-12-12)
  148. [ISSUE-31] Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-12)
  149. Re: Compliance issues (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-07)
  150. Compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
  151. Next steps on compliance issues (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-03)
  152. ISSUE-31: Minimization -- to what extent will minimization be required for use of a particular exemption? (conditional exemptions) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)

Related notes:

[npdoty]: Shane: do you get exemptions by using particular technical implementations?

21 Sep 2011, 20:58:15

[ifette]: "A third party MUST only retain that information which is still required for permitted uses, for as long as is reasonably necessary for those uses. When data is no longer required for any permited uses, it MUST NOT be retained. Data need not be stored multiple times for each permitted use, storing a single instance of the data is sufficient. … rest of existing text here"

4 Oct 2012, 08:34:43

[npdoty]: might be related to issue-134 around short-term retention of logs

29 May 2013, 16:52:26

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $