ISSUE-27: How should the "opt back in" mechanism be designed?

How should the "opt back in" mechanism be designed?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-09-21
Description:
Should "opt back in" be supported in the Do Not Track protocol itself, or should it be built using existing web technologies?

If in the protocol, how should the protocol be designed?

If using existing web technologies, what standards, if any, should there be around user interaction?


Originally:
Mechanism to revoke Do Not Track for specific entities (maybe I really like Google), "opt back in"
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. PENDING REVIEW: Proposal to close a series of PENDING REVIEW Items (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-02-21)
  2. diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
  3. Proposed Agenda for 2011-12-21 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20)
  4. Agenda for 2011-12-7 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-12-06)
  5. RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
  6. RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
  7. Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-30)
  8. Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-16 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-15)
  9. TPE site-specific exemption (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
  10. Re: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
  11. RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-16)
  12. RE: DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
  13. DISCUSSION: Selective Opt-in (chapter 5 of editors draft) [ISSUE-42, ISSUE-27, ISSUE-46] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-12)
  14. Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09)
  15. Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
  16. More details for tomorrow AM (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-09-22)
  17. Re: ISSUE-27: 'opt back in' (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-09-21)
  18. ISSUE-27: Mechanism to revoke Do Not Track for specific entities (maybe I really like Google), 'opt back in' (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-21)

Related notes:

[npdoty]: Kevin (Adobe): users should be able to opt back in for either a first or third party

21 Sep 2011, 21:04:45

[npdoty]: opting back in for a brand, for "an affiliated party"

21 Sep 2011, 21:05:21

2011-12-21: Nick and Shane will propose text for the spec

Matthias Schunter, 21 Dec 2011, 20:58:49

2012-01-15 Nick/Shane contribution Section 6 to the TPE Spec that addresses this issue.

Matthias Schunter, 19 Jan 2012, 16:38:34

2012-02-21: Text proposal: Section 6 of
http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html

I did not receive any feedback on this section and I plan to change the status of this issue to CLOSED.

Matthias Schunter, 21 Feb 2012, 16:27:45

2012-02-21: Proposal to close sent
2012-02-27: No objections received -> Closing the issue

Matthias Schunter, 27 Feb 2012, 15:52:23

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $