ISSUE-162: If we have a mechanism for indicating partial compliance, how do we convey to the user why, and what is

If we have a mechanism for indicating partial compliance, how do we convey to the user why, and what is

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
Raised by:
Opened on:
2012-08-22
Description:
Closed as a duplicate of ISSUE-161
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  2. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  3. Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-01-30)
  4. Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-01-29)
  5. ISSUE-162: If we have a mechanism for indicating partial compliance, how do we convey to the user why, and what is not being complied with, in a machine-readable manner? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-08-22)

Related notes:

If this is 'under construction' then there is discussion at

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Dec/0119.html

David Singer, 29 Jan 2013, 15:21:04

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $