ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance?

Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
Opened on:
2012-04-10
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of TCS issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-10)
  2. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2014-05-14)
  3. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-05-14)
  4. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call - UPDATE (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-14)
  5. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from singer@mac.com on 2014-05-13)
  6. Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-12)
  7. Agenda for May 7 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-06)
  8. Re: Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-04-28)
  9. Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-04-28)
  10. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
  11. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  12. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
  13. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
  14. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  15. Re: ISSUE-132: compliance or tpe? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-11-09)
  16. ISSUE-132: compliance or tpe? (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-09)
  17. RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
  18. Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
  19. ISSUE-132: Should the spec speak to intermediaries or hosting providers to modify any responses/statements about DNT compliance? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-10)

Related notes:

[ifette]: I would suggest that "an intermediary must not add or change any signal that will result in a server receiving an inconsistent DNT state when looking at the DNT value expressed in the header vs the DNT value expressed via the JavaScript API"

4 Oct 2012, 10:23:26

My text suggestion: "If a communication includes a DNT signal, do not modify or remove it."

Thomas Lowenthal, 4 Oct 2012, 10:29:32

Noted during issue cleanup, this may be a sub-issue of issue-194 around user consent.

Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 02:16:34

Closed per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2014Sep/0023.html

Justin Brookman, 25 Feb 2015, 03:47:23

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $