ACTION-295: Should v. Must (In General)
Should v. Must (In General)
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Berin Szoka
- Due on:
- October 11, 2012
- Created on:
- October 4, 2012
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-10-21)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2012-10-21)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-20)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from mike@w3.org on 2012-10-20)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2012-10-19)
- RE: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2012-10-19)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-10-18)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-18)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from James.Grimmelmann@nyls.edu on 2012-10-18)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-18)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-10-17)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-10-17)
- Re: ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from bszoka@techfreedom.org on 2012-10-17)
- ACTION-295: Should v. Must (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from bszoka@techfreedom.org on 2012-10-17)
- Re: Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-10-16)
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-16)
- Agenda for 16 October 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-16)
Related notes:
[rigo]: It is a placeholder and is incumbent on W3C to make the difference clearer between should and must
17 Oct 2012, 16:41:44[rigo]: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt <- read this
17 Oct 2012, 16:42:52Display change log.