ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?
default-graph
Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Graphs
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2011-04-13
- Description:
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-23#resolution_8
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-29 (Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?'), Yes, we do. ← - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Draft agenda / final one in a few hours late (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-23)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-22)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-21)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-21)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-18)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-18)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-17)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-17)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from alexhall@revelytix.com on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Sandro's Formal Objection (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
- Sandro's Formal Objection (from danbri@danbri.org on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-05-16)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-15)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-15)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-15)
- Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-15)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-14)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Making progress on graphs (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-13)
- Making progress on graphs (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-13)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2012-01-12)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-11)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
- Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-01-11)
- [GRAPH] RDF WG Issues Relating to the Graph TF (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-10-10)
- ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of 'default graph'? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log