ISSUE-14: What is a named graph and what should we call it?

named-g-boxes

What is a named graph and what should we call it?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDF Graphs
Raised by:
Sandro Hawke
Opened on:
2011-03-16
Description:
Probably "named g-box".
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-08-24)
  2. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from cgreer@marklogic.com on 2012-08-24)
  3. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-08-24)
  4. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-08-24)
  5. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from kidehen@openlinksw.com on 2012-08-24)
  6. Re: A rant about the terminology debate (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-08-24)
  7. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-04-10)
  8. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-10)
  9. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-04-05)
  10. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-05)
  11. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-04-04)
  12. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2012-04-04)
  13. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-04)
  14. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-04-03)
  15. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-03)
  16. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  17. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from cgreer@marklogic.com on 2012-04-02)
  18. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-04-02)
  19. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  20. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  21. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  22. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  23. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  24. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
  25. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-03-31)
  26. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from eric@w3.org on 2012-03-31)
  27. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-03-30)
  28. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from eric@w3.org on 2012-03-30)
  29. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-30)
  30. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-03-29)
  31. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from eric@w3.org on 2012-03-29)
  32. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-03-29)
  33. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from eric@w3.org on 2012-03-29)
  34. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from cgreer@marklogic.com on 2012-03-29)
  35. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-03-29)
  36. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-29)
  37. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-03-28)
  38. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-03-28)
  39. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  40. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2012-03-28)
  41. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  42. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  43. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  44. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  45. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-03-28)
  46. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-03-28)
  47. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  48. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-03-28)
  49. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  50. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-03-28)
  51. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-03-28)
  52. Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2012-03-28)
  53. New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (from sandro@w3.org on 2012-03-27)
  54. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr on 2012-01-12)
  55. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
  56. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-01-11)
  57. Re: Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-01-11)
  58. Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft (from david@3roundstones.com on 2012-01-11)
  59. [GRAPH] RDF WG Issues Relating to the Graph TF (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-10-10)
  60. Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion (from nathan@webr3.org on 2011-04-01)
  61. ISSUE-14: What is a named graph and what should we call it? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-03-16)

Related notes:

"Named graph"!

Peter Patel-Schneider, 16 Mar 2011, 15:52:59

testing

Sandro Hawke, 14 Nov 2011, 17:42:03

RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14. We're sticking with the SPARQL definition of Named Graphs. Informative text will explain that “named” isn't to be taken too literally, and that “named graph” often refers only to the graph part of the pair.

David Wood, 29 Oct 2012, 13:36:45

Display change log ATOM feed


Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, Chair, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 14.html,v 1.1 2014-07-09 12:17:56 carine Exp $