RDF Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 21 November 2012

Seen
Andy Seaborne, Antoine Zimmermann, Arnaud Le Hors, David Wood, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Ivan Herman, Markus Lanthaler, Peter Patel-Schneider, Pierre-Antoine Champin, Richard Cyganiak, Sandro Hawke, Souripriya Das, Ted Thibodeau, Thomas Baker, Unknown rdf-wg, Yves Raimond, Zhe Wu
Chair
David Wood
Scribe
Yves Raimond
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon link
  2. Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html link
  3. Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts link
Topics

There are some format problems with the chatlog. Please correct them and reload this page. They are labeled on this page in a red box, like this message.

It may be helpful to

15:02:58 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc

15:03:00 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

15:03:02 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 73394

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 73394

15:03:02 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 57 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 57 minutes

15:03:03 <trackbot> Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:03:03 <trackbot> Date: 21 November 2012
15:50:00 <rdf-wg> zakim, who is on the call?

Scribe problem: the name 'rdf-wg' does not match any of the 51 active names. Either change the name used, or request the list of names be altered.Active names: Jean-François Baget Thomas Baker Adrien BASSE Scott Bauer Aidan Boran Dan Brickley Matteo Brunati Gaoussou CAMARA Gavin Carothers Jeremy Carroll Pierre-Antoine Champin Kiu Ching Chieh Olivier Corby Richard Cyganiak Francois Daoust Souripriya Das Lee Feigenbaum Fabien Gandon Charles Greer Alex Hall Steve Harris Michael Hausenblas Sandro Hawke Patrick Hayes Ivan Herman Kingsley Idehen Gregg Kellogg Markus Lanthaler Arnaud Le Hors Dickson Lukose Ivan Mikhailov Peter Patel-Schneider Eric Prud'hommeaux Yves Raimond Nathan Rixham Guus Schreiber Andy Seaborne Manu Sporny Thomas Steiner Mouhamadou THIAM Ted Thibodeau Thomas Visel William Waites Jan Wielemaker David Wood Zhe Wu Mohamed ZERGAOUI Antoine Zimmermann Zakim IRC Bot Trackbot IRC Bot RRSAgent IRC Bot

Scribe problem: the name 'rdf-wg' does not match any of the 51 active names. Either change the name used, or request the list of names be altered.Active names: Jean-François Baget Thomas Baker Adrien BASSE Scott Bauer Aidan Boran Dan Brickley Matteo Brunati Gaoussou CAMARA Gavin Carothers Jeremy Carroll Pierre-Antoine Champin Kiu Ching Chieh Olivier Corby Richard Cyganiak Francois Daoust Souripriya Das Lee Feigenbaum Fabien Gandon Charles Greer Alex Hall Steve Harris Michael Hausenblas Sandro Hawke Patrick Hayes Ivan Herman Kingsley Idehen Gregg Kellogg Markus Lanthaler Arnaud Le Hors Dickson Lukose Ivan Mikhailov Peter Patel-Schneider Eric Prud'hommeaux Yves Raimond Nathan Rixham Guus Schreiber Andy Seaborne Manu Sporny Thomas Steiner Mouhamadou THIAM Ted Thibodeau Thomas Visel William Waites Jan Wielemaker David Wood Zhe Wu Mohamed ZERGAOUI Antoine Zimmermann Zakim IRC Bot Trackbot IRC Bot RRSAgent IRC Bot

(No events recorded for 46 minutes)

Unknown rdf-wg: zakim, who is on the call?

15:50:00 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, rdf-wg

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, rdf-wg

15:50:01 <Zakim> On IRC I see rdf-wg, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see rdf-wg, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

15:51:30 <tbaker> zakim, who is on the call?

Thomas Baker: zakim, who is on the call?

15:51:30 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, tbaker

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has not yet started, tbaker

15:51:31 <Zakim> On IRC I see tbaker, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see tbaker, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

15:51:37 <Zakim> SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started

15:51:38 <Zakim> +EricP

Zakim IRC Bot: +EricP

15:52:07 <ericP> tbaker, are you trying to debug something?

Eric Prud'hommeaux: tbaker, are you trying to debug something?

15:52:20 <ericP> i've joined (started) the call in case that helps

Eric Prud'hommeaux: i've joined (started) the call in case that helps

15:53:18 <tbaker> Yes  an irc client on my iPhone

Thomas Baker: Yes an irc client on my iPhone

15:53:44 <Zakim> +??P2

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P2

15:53:52 <ericP> ahh, you're just asking questions of Zakim 'cause he's likely to answer

Eric Prud'hommeaux: ahh, you're just asking questions of Zakim 'cause he's likely to answer

15:54:11 <tbaker> Will be only on irc today - in car.

Thomas Baker: Will be only on irc today - in car.

15:54:13 <tbaker> Yes

Thomas Baker: Yes

15:57:04 <Zakim> +pfps

Zakim IRC Bot: +pfps

16:00:38 <Zakim> + +1.540.898.aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.540.898.aaaa

16:00:39 <sandro> RRSAgent, pointer?

Sandro Hawke: RRSAgent, pointer?

16:00:39 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc#T16-00-39

RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc#T16-00-39

16:00:53 <davidwood> Zakim, aaaa is mw

David Wood: Zakim, aaaa is mw

16:00:53 <Zakim> +mw; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +mw; got it

16:01:01 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro

16:01:05 <davidwood> Zakim, aaaa is me

David Wood: Zakim, aaaa is me

16:01:05 <Zakim> sorry, davidwood, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, davidwood, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'

16:01:13 <davidwood> Zakim, mw is me

David Wood: Zakim, mw is me

16:01:13 <Zakim> +davidwood; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +davidwood; got it

16:01:48 <Zakim> +??P14

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P14

16:01:50 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

16:01:54 <AndyS> zakim, P14 is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, P14 is me

16:01:54 <Zakim> sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named 'P14'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named 'P14'

16:01:58 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip

Ivan Herman: zakim, dial ivan-voip

16:01:58 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, ivan; the call is being made

16:02:00 <Zakim> +Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: +Ivan

16:02:00 <AndyS> zakim, IPCaller is me

Andy Seaborne: zakim, IPCaller is me

16:02:00 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it

16:02:12 <pchampin_> zakim, ??P14 is me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: zakim, ??P14 is me

16:02:12 <Zakim> +pchampin_; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +pchampin_; got it

16:02:40 <yvesr> scribenick: yvesr

(Scribe set to Yves Raimond)

16:02:40 <davidwood> Chair: David Wood
16:02:50 <davidwood> Zakim, who is here?

David Wood: Zakim, who is here?

16:02:50 <Zakim> On the phone I see EricP, ??P2, pfps, davidwood, Sandro, pchampin_, AndyS, Ivan

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see EricP, ??P2, pfps, davidwood, Sandro, pchampin_, AndyS, Ivan

16:02:52 <Zakim> On IRC I see pchampin_, pfps, tbaker, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see pchampin_, pfps, tbaker, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, mischat, AndyS, davidwood, gavinc, Arnaud, trackbot, manu1, manu, yvesr, sandro, ericP

16:02:52 <Zakim> +MHausenblas

Zakim IRC Bot: +MHausenblas

16:02:52 <Zakim> +Arnaud

Zakim IRC Bot: +Arnaud

16:03:36 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aabb

16:03:38 <Zakim> - +1.603.897.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: - +1.603.897.aabb

16:03:52 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aacc

16:04:14 <sandro> sandro has changed the topic to: RDF-WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda will be http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.11.21

Sandro Hawke: sandro has changed the topic to: RDF-WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/ -- agenda will be http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.11.21

16:04:45 <cygri> zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me

Richard Cyganiak: zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me

16:04:45 <Zakim> +cygri; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +cygri; got it

16:04:48 <AndyS> zakim, who is making noise?

Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is making noise?

16:04:50 <davidwood> PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon:

David Wood: PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon:

16:04:50 <davidwood>

David Wood:

16:04:50 <davidwood>    http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-11-07

David Wood: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-11-07

16:04:59 <Zakim> AndyS, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: davidwood (39%), Ivan (60%)

Zakim IRC Bot: AndyS, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: davidwood (39%), Ivan (60%)

16:05:12 <yvesr> RESOLVED:  to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon

RESOLVED: to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon

16:05:28 <ivan> zakim, mute me

Ivan Herman: zakim, mute me

16:05:28 <Zakim> Ivan should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: Ivan should now be muted

16:05:36 <davidwood> Review of action items

David Wood: Review of action items

16:05:36 <davidwood> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview

David Wood: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview

16:05:36 <davidwood> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

David Wood: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

16:05:58 <yvesr> davidwood: andys completed two actions

David Wood: andys completed two actions

16:06:01 <Arnaud> zakim, unmute me

Arnaud Le Hors: zakim, unmute me

16:06:01 <Zakim> Arnaud was not muted, Arnaud

Zakim IRC Bot: Arnaud was not muted, Arnaud

16:06:08 <Zakim> +??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17

16:06:20 <markus> zakim, ??P17 is me

Markus Lanthaler: zakim, ??P17 is me

16:06:20 <Zakim> +markus; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +markus; got it

16:06:32 <yvesr> Arnaud: my action is about the rdf schema document, we were unsure danbri would be able to edit it

Arnaud Le Hors: my action is about the rdf schema document, we were unsure danbri would be able to edit it

16:06:38 <yvesr> Arnaud: danbri said he will be able to do it

Arnaud Le Hors: danbri said he will be able to do it

16:06:39 <davidwood> CLOSE ACTION-198

David Wood: CLOSE ACTION-198

16:06:39 <trackbot> ACTION-198 Check with Dan what he wants to do with regard to editorship (remain editor, leave it to Arnaud, remain co-editor?) closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-198 Check with Dan what he wants to do with regard to editorship (remain editor, leave it to Arnaud, remain co-editor?) closed

16:06:50 <davidwood> CLOSE ACTION-206

David Wood: CLOSE ACTION-206

16:06:50 <trackbot> ACTION-206 Put Turtle tests into W3C space. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-206 Put Turtle tests into W3C space. closed

16:06:56 <davidwood> CLOSE ACTION-207

David Wood: CLOSE ACTION-207

16:06:56 <trackbot> ACTION-207 Do some documentation/README for the tests. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-207 Do some documentation/README for the tests. closed

16:06:57 <yvesr> Arnaud: but is there much work to do, now we resolved on rdf:Seq?

Arnaud Le Hors: but is there much work to do, now we resolved on rdf:Seq?

16:07:01 <AndyS> AndyS actions - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0223.html

Andy Seaborne: AndyS actions - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0223.html

16:07:05 <yvesr> Arnaud: So I think that takes care of my action

Arnaud Le Hors: So I think that takes care of my action

16:07:19 <yvesr> davidwood: Moving on to open actions

David Wood: Moving on to open actions

16:07:30 <Zakim> + +081165aadd

Zakim IRC Bot: + +081165aadd

16:07:38 <yvesr> sandro: I want to talk about my IETF action

Sandro Hawke: I want to talk about my IETF action

16:07:39 <sandro> http://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xml

Sandro Hawke: http://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xml

16:07:39 <AZ> Zakim, aadd is me

Antoine Zimmermann: Zakim, aadd is me

16:07:39 <Zakim> +AZ; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +AZ; got it

16:07:56 <davidwood> CLOSE ACTION-82

David Wood: CLOSE ACTION-82

16:07:56 <trackbot> ACTION-82 Draft well-known URI template and propose WG resolution that it is "stable" enough for IETF. closed

Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-82 Draft well-known URI template and propose WG resolution that it is "stable" enough for IETF. closed

16:08:01 <yvesr> sandro: genid is now registered

Sandro Hawke: genid is now registered

16:08:10 <cygri> excellent!

Richard Cyganiak: excellent!

16:08:27 <yvesr> davidwood: we'll move on to RDF Concepts

David Wood: we'll move on to RDF Concepts

16:08:31 <yvesr> topic: RDF Concepts

1. RDF Concepts

16:08:54 <cygri> ISSUE-104?

Richard Cyganiak: ISSUE-104?

16:08:54 <trackbot> ISSUE-104 -- Too many informative Notes in RDF Concepts -- open

Trackbot IRC Bot: ISSUE-104 -- Too many informative Notes in RDF Concepts -- open

16:08:54 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/104

Trackbot IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/104

16:09:00 <davidwood> Check for consensus on http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/104 (Too many Notes)

David Wood: Check for consensus on http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/104 (Too many Notes)

16:09:00 <davidwood> 	1.	PROPOSAL: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

David Wood: 1. PROPOSAL: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

16:09:07 <yvesr> davidwood: let's move on to check on consensus on ISSUE-104

David Wood: let's move on to check on consensus on ISSUE-104

16:09:38 <yvesr> cygri: The background for the issue is that there is a lot of informative text in RDF Concepts

Richard Cyganiak: The background for the issue is that there is a lot of informative text in RDF Concepts

16:09:56 <yvesr> ... It was pointed out that this can be overwhelming

... It was pointed out that this can be overwhelming

16:10:11 <yvesr> ... The places I identified were based on my own bias

... The places I identified were based on my own bias

16:10:33 <yvesr> ... The four that are listed in this email are: 1) Concerns with XML 1.1

... The four that are listed in this email are: 1) Concerns with XML 1.1

16:10:47 <yvesr> ... 2) Confusing language tags with locales

... 2) Confusing language tags with locales

16:10:57 <yvesr> ... 3) Some details about how to use schema assets

... 3) Some details about how to use schema assets

16:11:29 <yvesr> ... 4) Section regarding language tags

... 4) Section regarding language tags

16:11:45 <yvesr> ... If no one wants to speak up for any of them, then I'll drop them

... If no one wants to speak up for any of them, then I'll drop them

16:11:47 <pfps> These notes were added in response to external comments, I believe.   However, I still support removing them.  Just don't lose them, because there may be cries to reinstate them.

Peter Patel-Schneider: These notes were added in response to external comments, I believe. However, I still support removing them. Just don't lose them, because there may be cries to reinstate them.

16:12:15 <yvesr> davidwood: There has been a discussion on the mailing list, this should be relatively uncontroversial

David Wood: There has been a discussion on the mailing list, this should be relatively uncontroversial

16:12:24 <yvesr> cygri: I agree with what pfps said on IRC

Richard Cyganiak: I agree with what pfps said on IRC

16:12:47 <yvesr> ... But I think 8 years later we might try again to remove them

... But I think 8 years later we might try again to remove them

16:12:57 <yvesr> ... If people are concerned about it then we can reinstate them

... If people are concerned about it then we can reinstate them

16:13:01 <yvesr> ... They don't add much value

... They don't add much value

16:13:24 <yvesr> davidwood: We could make a WG resolution that we are going to resolve ISSUE-104

David Wood: We could make a WG resolution that we are going to resolve ISSUE-104

16:13:51 <Zakim> + +1.603.438.aaee

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.438.aaee

16:14:03 <zwu2> zakim, aaee is me

Zhe Wu: zakim, aaee is me

16:14:03 <Zakim> +zwu2; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +zwu2; got it

16:14:04 <yvesr> sandro: davidwood is saying the document should provide a pointer

Sandro Hawke: davidwood is saying the resolution should provide a pointer

16:14:27 <yvesr> davidwood: We should vote on this

David Wood: We should vote on this

16:14:37 <cygri> +1

Richard Cyganiak: +1

16:14:39 <yvesr> +1

+1

16:14:46 <ivan> +1

Ivan Herman: +1

16:14:46 <pchampin_> +1

Pierre-Antoine Champin: +1

16:14:47 <davidwood> +1

David Wood: +1

16:14:47 <sandro> s/document/resolution/
16:14:47 <Arnaud> +1

Arnaud Le Hors: +1

16:14:52 <Souri> +1

Souripriya Das: +1

16:14:55 <markus> +1

Markus Lanthaler: +1

16:14:59 <sandro> +0.5  (I like more info....)

Sandro Hawke: +0.5 (I like more info....)

16:15:03 <pfps> +1

Peter Patel-Schneider: +1

16:15:08 <tbaker> +1

Thomas Baker: +1

16:15:10 <AndyS> +1

Andy Seaborne: +1

16:15:21 <zwu2> +1

Zhe Wu: +1

16:15:44 <sandro> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

Sandro Hawke: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

16:15:51 <AZ> ok +1

Antoine Zimmermann: ok +1

16:15:53 <sandro> (that's the proposal we're voting on)

Sandro Hawke: (that's the proposal we're voting on)

16:16:13 <yvesr> RESOLVED: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

RESOLVED: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html

16:16:17 <davidwood> Check for consensus on ISSUE-110 (Term for g-box)

David Wood: Check for consensus on ISSUE-110 (Term for g-box)

16:16:17 <davidwood> PROPOSAL 1: Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts

David Wood: PROPOSAL 1: Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts

16:16:52 <davidwood> PROPOSAL 2: Keep the informal term “g-box” in Concepts

David Wood: PROPOSAL 2: Keep the informal term “g-box” in Concepts

16:17:12 <yvesr> davidwood: This is an editorial issue in Concepts

David Wood: This is an editorial issue in Concepts

16:17:31 <yvesr> ... There has been a discussion on the mailing list

... There has been a discussion on the mailing list

16:17:39 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software

Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software

16:17:44 <yvesr> ... Unless there are any objections, we should leave that as an editorial issue

... Unless there are any objections, we should leave that as an editorial issue

16:17:44 <MacTed> Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

Ted Thibodeau: Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me

16:17:44 <Zakim> +MacTed; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +MacTed; got it

16:17:51 <yvesr> sandro: I'd like a WG decision on this

Sandro Hawke: I'd like a WG decision on this

16:17:54 <AndyS> RDF sources

Andy Seaborne: RDF sources

16:17:59 <AZ> 1

Antoine Zimmermann: 1

16:18:00 <sandro> 1

Sandro Hawke: 1

16:18:00 <yvesr> RDF sources

RDF sources

16:18:01 <pfps> RDF sources

Peter Patel-Schneider: RDF sources

16:18:04 <zwu2> RDF sources sounds better

Zhe Wu: RDF sources sounds better

16:18:07 <markus> RDF sources

Markus Lanthaler: RDF sources

16:18:11 <cygri> fine with either

Richard Cyganiak: fine with either

16:18:17 <davidwood> RDF Sources (1)

David Wood: RDF Sources (1)

16:18:18 <pfps> \me down with g-men and g-boxes!

Peter Patel-Schneider: \me down with g-men and g-boxes!

16:18:20 <sandro> 1 for "rdf sources" 2 for "g-box"

Sandro Hawke: 1 for "rdf sources" 2 for "g-box"

16:18:25 <pchampin_> no preference for me

Pierre-Antoine Champin: no preference for me

16:18:30 <ericP> 2

Eric Prud'hommeaux: 2

16:18:40 <tbaker> +1 rdf sources

Thomas Baker: +1 rdf sources

16:18:48 <Souri> 1

Souripriya Das: 1

16:18:53 <Arnaud> 0, no real preference, both proposals have their pros and cons

Arnaud Le Hors: 0, no real preference, both proposals have their pros and cons

16:19:13 <yvesr> davidwood: I believe the vote has come down on the side of RDF sources

David Wood: I believe the vote has come down on the side of RDF sources

16:19:21 <yvesr> ... If anyone objects, could they please speak up

... If anyone objects, could they please speak up

16:19:23 <Arnaud> rdf sources sound better

Arnaud Le Hors: rdf sources sound better

16:19:44 <yvesr> ... Let's resolve ISSUE-110 by calling them RDF Sources in concepts

... Let's resolve ISSUE-110 by calling them RDF Sources in concepts

16:19:48 <Arnaud> g-box seems more precise/technical

Arnaud Le Hors: g-box seems more precise/technical

16:19:53 <yvesr> RESOLVED:  Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts

RESOLVED: Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts

16:20:32 <sandro> (closes issue-110)

Sandro Hawke: (closes ISSUE-110)

16:20:35 <yvesr> pfps: g-box is RDF sources, g-snaps are RDF graphs

Eric Prud'hommeaux: g-box is RDF sources, g-snaps are RDF graphs

16:20:41 <yvesr> s/pfps/ericp
16:20:55 <sandro> RRSAgent, pointer?

Sandro Hawke: RRSAgent, pointer?

16:20:55 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc#T16-20-55

RRSAgent IRC Bot: See http://www.w3.org/2012/11/21-rdf-wg-irc#T16-20-55



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#1) generated 2012-11-21 16:24:48 UTC by 'sandro', comments: None