ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs?
dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-DICTIONARY
- Raised by:
- Luc Moreau
- Opened on:
- 2013-03-13
- Description:
- Hi,
It seems that the prov-n notation for dictionary insertion allows for id and attributes, but the xml schema does not. Ontology contains a qualified Insertion.
So is this a mistake of the schema?
Thanks,
Luc - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov on 2013-03-14)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-03-14)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-14)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-14)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-03-14)
- PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-13)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log