ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs?

dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

PROV-DICTIONARY

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2013-03-13

Description:

Hi,

It seems that the prov-n notation for dictionary insertion allows for id and attributes, but the xml schema does not. Ontology contains a qualified Insertion.

So is this a mistake of the schema?

Thanks,
Luc

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-28)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-25)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov on 2013-03-14)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-03-14)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2013-03-14)
6. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-03-14)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2013-03-14)
8. PROV-ISSUE-650: dictionary insertion, with or without id/attrs? [PROV-DICTIONARY] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-03-13)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log