ISSUE-336: Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD
provo-2WD-feedback
Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-O HTML
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-02
- Description:
- Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed,
You and the rest of the working group are welcome to review and provide feedback for the internal 2WD draft located at:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/spwd/for-internal-wg-review/prov-o.html
Per http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.03.29#PROV-O
please consider the following questions in your feedback:
Questions to be reviewed for:
* Does the HTML file provide an adequate overview of the OWL design elements?
* Do the different organizations of PROV-O HTML and DM complement each other, or is it distracting?
* Would any additional comments (or attributes) help you read the cross reference list in PROV-O HTML?
* Are the comments within the OWL file adequate to familiarize with the structure? If not, what kinds of comments would help?
* Should the OWL file contain any links to documentation (e.g., to the DM, to examples, etc.)?
* Can the document be released as a next public working draft? If no, what are the blocking issues? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-26)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from tthibodeau@openlinksw.com on 2012-04-26)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-25)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-20)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-20)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-19)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-04-19)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-04-19)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-18)
- Fwd: PROV-O: Review Sam Coppens (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-11)
- Review of PROV-O - ISSUE-336 (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-04-08)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-04-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-04)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-04-04)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-04)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-04-03)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-03)
- Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-04-03)
- PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
- PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-02)
Related notes:
The feedback provided, and their responses are being managed at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Prov-o_draft_review_2_April_2012
Timothy Lebo, 30 Apr 2012, 15:20:10Display change log