<sandro> guest: Dan (danbri) Brickley
13:53:45 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/21-gld-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/21-gld-irc ←
13:53:50 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
13:53:50 <trackbot> Date: 21 March 2013
13:54:52 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started
Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started ←
13:54:59 <Zakim> +??P4
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P4 ←
13:55:05 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??P4 is me
Bart van Leeuwen: Zakim, ??P4 is me ←
13:55:05 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BartvanLeeuwen; got it ←
13:56:05 <BartvanLeeuwen> hi HadleyBeeman
Bart van Leeuwen: hi HadleyBeeman ←
13:56:59 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman ←
13:58:52 <HadleyBeeman> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130321
13:59:52 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who is on the call
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who is on the call ←
13:59:52 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'who is on the call', HadleyBeeman ←
13:59:57 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who's here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who's here? ←
13:59:57 <Zakim> On the phone I see BartvanLeeuwen, HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see BartvanLeeuwen, HadleyBeeman ←
13:59:58 <Zakim> On IRC I see MariosMeimaris, PhilA, gatemezi, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, TallTed, cygri, danbri, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see MariosMeimaris, PhilA, gatemezi, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, TallTed, cygri, danbri, sandro, trackbot ←
14:00:08 <TallTed> TallTed has changed the topic to: Gov't Linked Data WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130321
Ted Thibodeau: TallTed has changed the topic to: Gov't Linked Data WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/ -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130321 ←
14:00:15 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:00:22 <PhilA> zakim, IPcaller is me
Phil Archer: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:00:22 <Zakim> +PhilA; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +PhilA; got it ←
14:00:43 <Zakim> +OpenLink_Software
Zakim IRC Bot: +OpenLink_Software ←
14:01:16 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:01:26 <MariosMeimaris> zakim, IPcaller is me
Marios Meimaris: zakim, IPcaller is me ←
14:01:26 <Zakim> +MariosMeimaris; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MariosMeimaris; got it ←
14:01:41 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:02:24 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:02:40 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen
Zakim IRC Bot: -BartvanLeeuwen ←
14:02:46 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, who's here?
Hadley Beeman: zakim, who's here? ←
14:02:46 <Zakim> On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, PhilA, TallTed (muted), MariosMeimaris, james, DaveReynolds
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see HadleyBeeman, PhilA, TallTed (muted), MariosMeimaris, james, DaveReynolds ←
14:02:48 <Zakim> On IRC I see gld, DaveReynolds, james, MariosMeimaris, PhilA, gatemezi, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, TallTed, cygri, danbri, sandro, trackbot
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see gld, DaveReynolds, james, MariosMeimaris, PhilA, gatemezi, Zakim, RRSAgent, HadleyBeeman, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, TallTed, cygri, danbri, sandro, trackbot ←
14:03:06 <Zakim> +??P4
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P4 ←
14:03:13 <sandro> one sec
Sandro Hawke: one sec ←
14:03:13 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??p4 is me
Bart van Leeuwen: Zakim, ??p4 is me ←
14:03:13 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +BartvanLeeuwen; got it ←
14:03:34 <Zakim> +Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro ←
14:04:18 <HadleyBeeman> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130321
14:04:20 <MariosMeimaris> I've never done it in the past :(
Marios Meimaris: I've never done it in the past :( ←
14:04:28 <Zakim> +??P15
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P15 ←
14:04:31 <PhilA> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20130321
14:04:34 <PhilA> Chair: HadleyBeeman
14:04:39 <PhilA> scribe: james
(Scribe set to James McKinney)
14:04:40 <MariosMeimaris> Ok thanks!
Marios Meimaris: Ok thanks! ←
14:04:42 <martinA> zakim, ??P15 is me
Martín Álvarez: zakim, ??P15 is me ←
14:04:42 <Zakim> +martinA; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +martinA; got it ←
14:04:46 <PhilA> scribeNick: james
14:05:09 <PhilA> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-14
Phil Archer: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-14 ←
14:05:09 <Zakim> + +35386100aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +35386100aaaa ←
14:05:16 <HadleyBeeman> Previous minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-14
Hadley Beeman: Previous minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2013-03-14 ←
14:05:26 <james> TOPIC: Acceptance of minutes
14:05:44 <martinA> +1
Martín Álvarez: +1 ←
14:05:44 <Zakim> +mike_pendleton
Zakim IRC Bot: +mike_pendleton ←
14:05:50 <MariosMeimaris> +1
Marios Meimaris: +1 ←
14:05:58 <Zakim> +davidwood
Zakim IRC Bot: +davidwood ←
14:05:59 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
14:06:12 <james> RESOLUTION: Minutes accepted
RESOLVED: Minutes accepted ←
14:06:15 <bhyland> zakim, davidwood is me
Bernadette Hyland: zakim, davidwood is me ←
14:06:15 <Zakim> +bhyland; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bhyland; got it ←
14:08:24 <james> TOPIC: How to acknowledge active participants in published documents
14:08:32 <sandro> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=47663
Sandro Hawke: https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=47663 ←
14:09:29 <james> sandro: may be unfair to give inactive members equal recognition as active members
Sandro Hawke: may be unfair to give inactive members equal recognition as active members ←
14:10:04 <james> … option is to have a section that recognizes active members according to some metric, e.g. activity within past two months
… option is to have a section that recognizes active members according to some metric, e.g. activity within past two months ←
14:10:12 <bhyland> q?
Bernadette Hyland: q? ←
14:10:28 <james> PhilA: do we not use "good standing" anymore?
Phil Archer: do we not use "good standing" anymore? ←
14:10:43 <bhyland> +agenda, cleaning up the participants list
Bernadette Hyland: +agenda, cleaning up the participants list ←
14:10:46 <james> sandro: "good standing" has been considered too heavy handed in the past
Sandro Hawke: "good standing" has been considered too heavy handed in the past ←
14:11:47 <bhyland> Proposed: Anyone who has done specific work (i.e., review, feedback) + attendees in the WG who have attended at least 3 meetings in last quarter
PROPOSED: Anyone who has done specific work (i.e., review, feedback) + attendees in the WG who have attended at least 3 meetings in last quarter ←
14:11:54 <Zakim> + +352.6.2.1.1.9.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +352.6.2.1.1.9.aabb ←
14:12:09 <HadleyBeeman> +1
Hadley Beeman: +1 ←
14:12:27 <MakxDekkers> zakim, aabb is me
Makx Dekkers: zakim, aabb is me ←
14:12:27 <Zakim> sorry, MakxDekkers, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, MakxDekkers, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' ←
14:12:33 <sandro> +1
Sandro Hawke: +1 ←
14:12:36 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1
Bart van Leeuwen: +1 ←
14:12:38 <gatemezi> +1
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 ←
14:12:42 <PhilA> +1
Phil Archer: +1 ←
14:12:43 <TallTed> +1
Ted Thibodeau: +1 ←
14:12:43 <martinA> +1
Martín Álvarez: +1 ←
14:12:44 <DaveReynolds> +1
Dave Reynolds: +1 ←
14:12:45 <bhyland> +1
Bernadette Hyland: +1 ←
14:12:50 <MariosMeimaris> +1
Marios Meimaris: +1 ←
14:12:57 <james> RESOLVED: Anyone who has done specific work (i.e., review, feedback) + attendees in the WG who have attended at least 3 meetings in last quarter
RESOLVED: Anyone who has done specific work (i.e., review, feedback) + attendees in the WG who have attended at least 3 meetings in last quarter ←
14:13:30 <sandro> action: sandro determine who meets the current "active participants" bar, for including in publications
ACTION: sandro determine who meets the current "active participants" bar, for including in publications ←
14:13:30 <trackbot> Created ACTION-105 - Determine who meets the current "active participants" bar, for including in publications [on Sandro Hawke - due 2013-03-28].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-105 - Determine who meets the current "active participants" bar, for including in publications [on Sandro Hawke - due 2013-03-28]. ←
14:14:18 <james> bhyland: a few members have asked to be withdrawn, GLD should do some clean up to remove those members
Bernadette Hyland: a few members have asked to be withdrawn, GLD should do some clean up to remove those members ←
14:14:56 <james> sandro: there is a software bug in that some members who have left still show up on a list of members
Sandro Hawke: there is a software bug in that some members who have left still show up on a list of members ←
14:15:24 <james> Topic: Seek consensus to transition ADMS to working group note
14:15:28 <PhilA> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Adms
Phil Archer: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Adms ←
14:15:43 <Zakim> -Sandro
Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro ←
14:16:06 <Mike_Pendleton> muted
Michael Pendleton: muted ←
14:16:24 <james> PhilA: a lot has changed since the last publication of ADMS, in particular with respect to DCAT
Phil Archer: a lot has changed since the last publication of ADMS, in particular with respect to DCAT ←
14:17:19 <PhilA> http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/
Phil Archer: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/ ←
14:17:50 <james> PhilA: ADMS is, to my knowledge, only used in one place: the above EU platform
Phil Archer: ADMS is, to my knowledge, only used in one place: the above EU platform ←
14:18:02 <PhilA> http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/all?keys=css&field_language_textfield_lang_value=&sort_option=date-desc¤t_checkbox=1
Phil Archer: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/all?keys=css&field_language_textfield_lang_value=&sort_option=date-desc¤t_checkbox=1 ←
14:18:15 <MakxDekkers> https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/repository/all
Makx Dekkers: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/catalogue/repository/all ←
14:19:03 <gatemezi> I think also in Neologism? http://neologism.deri.ie/
Ghislain Atemezing: I think also in Neologism? http://neologism.deri.ie/ ←
14:19:27 <james> PhilA: ADMS was written according to old convention of having a conceptual model and an RDF model
Phil Archer: ADMS was written according to old convention of having a conceptual model and an RDF model ←
14:19:30 <gatemezi> Correct me if I am wrong, deri folks :-
Ghislain Atemezing: Correct me if I am wrong, deri folks :- ←
14:19:48 <james> PhilA: a new ADMS diagram for discussion is at http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Adms, which simplifies the old diagram
Phil Archer: a new ADMS diagram for discussion is at http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Adms, which simplifies the old diagram ←
14:20:01 <MakxDekkers> There are EU member states that also use it. Need to find references.
Makx Dekkers: There are EU member states that also use it. Need to find references. ←
14:20:12 <james> PhilA: it uses much more of DCAT (is almost the same), and no longer uses Radion
Phil Archer: it uses much more of DCAT (is almost the same), and no longer uses Radion ←
14:20:53 <james> PhilA: the proposed new ADMS version can be understood as a profile of DCAT, similar to how RegOrg is a profile of ORG
Phil Archer: the proposed new ADMS version can be understood as a profile of DCAT, similar to how RegOrg is a profile of ORG ←
14:21:30 <MakxDekkers> +q
Makx Dekkers: +q ←
14:21:49 <HadleyBeeman> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html
Hadley Beeman: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html ←
14:22:07 <james> PhilA: looking for feedback and discussion around the proposed new version
Phil Archer: looking for feedback and discussion around the proposed new version ←
14:22:27 <james> HadleyBeeman: is the editor's draft updated as well?
Hadley Beeman: is the editor's draft updated as well? ←
14:22:34 <james> PhilA: not yet
Phil Archer: not yet ←
14:23:20 <PhilA> ack MakxDekkers
Phil Archer: ack MakxDekkers ←
14:24:00 <james> MakxDekkers: there seem to be certain things described by ADMS which are not datasets, e.g. a specification document
Makx Dekkers: there seem to be certain things described by ADMS which are not datasets, e.g. a specification document ←
14:24:20 <HadleyBeeman> Ah, PhilA: I see the confusion. ADMS was scheduled for publication on 26 Mar, which is next week, which implies a consensus today. But I'm sorry we didn't make that clear. We'll go for consensus next then, as just discussed.
Hadley Beeman: Ah, PhilA: I see the confusion. ADMS was scheduled for publication on 26 Mar, which is next week, which implies a consensus today. But I'm sorry we didn't make that clear. We'll go for consensus next then, as just discussed. ←
14:24:35 <PhilA> DCAT def of a datatset is - This class represents the actual dataset as published by the dataset publisher. In cases where a distinction between the actual dataset and its entry in the catalog is necessary (because metadata such as modification date and maintainer might differ), the catalog record class can be used for the latter.
Phil Archer: DCAT def of a datatset is - This class represents the actual dataset as published by the dataset publisher. In cases where a distinction between the actual dataset and its entry in the catalog is necessary (because metadata such as modification date and maintainer might differ), the catalog record class can be used for the latter. ←
14:24:56 <PhilA> A collection of data, published or curated by a single source, and available for access or download in one or more formats.
Phil Archer: A collection of data, published or curated by a single source, and available for access or download in one or more formats. ←
14:25:42 <Zakim> +gatemezi
Zakim IRC Bot: +gatemezi ←
14:26:37 <james> PhilA: question is, does a spec document count as a dataset, according to the broad definition given by DCAT?
Phil Archer: question is, does a spec document count as a dataset, according to the broad definition given by DCAT? ←
14:29:29 <james> PhilA: people have argued the question both ways, which somewhat opens the door to using DCAT in ADMS
Phil Archer: people have argued the question both ways, which somewhat opens the door to using DCAT in ADMS ←
14:29:30 <james> PhilA: if ADMS is a profile of DCAT, it gets a lot of properties for free
Phil Archer: if ADMS is a profile of DCAT, it gets a lot of properties for free ←
14:30:05 <DaveReynolds> Broad approach makes sense to me, not familiar enough with the details to spot specific problems
Dave Reynolds: Broad approach makes sense to me, not familiar enough with the details to spot specific problems ←
14:30:38 <PhilA> fadi?
Phil Archer: fadi? ←
14:30:44 <PhilA> fadmaa?
Phil Archer: fadmaa? ←
14:31:48 <james> HadleyBeeman: administrative issue: Tracker is not tracking ADMS
Hadley Beeman: administrative issue: Tracker is not tracking ADMS ←
14:33:01 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
14:33:10 <HadleyBeeman> ack davereynolds
Hadley Beeman: ack davereynolds ←
14:33:18 <james> PhilA: not currently necessary to create a tracker for ADMS
Phil Archer: not currently necessary to create a tracker for ADMS ←
14:33:55 <james> DaveReynolds: is there enough time for people to read the new draft before next week, if we need to vote on the ADMS WG note next week?
Dave Reynolds: is there enough time for people to read the new draft before next week, if we need to vote on the ADMS WG note next week? ←
14:35:36 <james> HadleyBeeman: can we move approval of ADMS to Apr 4?
Hadley Beeman: can we move approval of ADMS to Apr 4? ←
14:36:02 <james> PhilA: will aim to have new version ADMS ready for ��next week
Phil Archer: will aim to have new version ADMS ready for ��next week ←
14:36:30 <james> ADMS approval moved to Apr 4
ADMS approval moved to Apr 4 ←
14:36:46 <HadleyBeeman> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Mar/
Hadley Beeman: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Mar/ ←
14:36:47 <james> Topic: How to get more attention/help on last call docs for "widespread public review" (especially Data Cube)
14:37:17 <james> HadleyBeeman: the above mailing list is part of the evidence of widespread public review
Hadley Beeman: the above mailing list is part of the evidence of widespread public review ←
14:38:04 <james> HadleyBeeman: we received feedback for DCAT and ORG, need to get more feedback on DCAT and Cube
Hadley Beeman: we received feedback for DCAT and ORG, need to get more feedback on DCAT and Cube ←
14:39:14 <james> bhyland: are there people in our network from other standards bodies who can provide feedback?
Bernadette Hyland: are there people in our network from other standards bodies who can provide feedback? ←
14:40:20 <james> suggest OKF lists like http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/data-protocols http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/data-catalogs
suggest OKF lists like http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/data-protocols http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/data-catalogs ←
14:41:44 <PhilA> q+
Phil Archer: q+ ←
14:42:01 <PhilA> ack me
Phil Archer: ack me ←
14:42:22 <james> q+
q+ ←
14:42:44 <james> PhilA: who already uses Cube?
Phil Archer: who already uses Cube? ←
14:42:45 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
14:42:53 <gatemezi> We have also the public vocab list of the W3c
Ghislain Atemezing: We have also the public vocab list of the W3c ←
14:43:23 <james> DaveReynolds: Cube used to publish statistics in Ireland and by DERI, EU, etc.
Dave Reynolds: Cube used to publish statistics in Ireland and by DERI, EU, etc. ←
14:44:35 <PhilA> q- DaveReynolds
Phil Archer: q- DaveReynolds ←
14:44:41 <PhilA> ack james
Phil Archer: ack james ←
14:45:01 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1 for the draft message
Bart van Leeuwen: +1 for the draft message ←
14:45:20 <gatemezi> +1 also for the draft message bhyland
Ghislain Atemezing: +1 also for the draft message bhyland ←
14:46:06 <james> james: can a draft message be sent to GLD list for members to send to appropriate mailing lists, as part of outreach for feedback?
James McKinney: can a draft message be sent to GLD list for members to send to appropriate mailing lists, as part of outreach for feedback? ←
14:46:08 <james> HadleyBeeman: yes
Hadley Beeman: yes ←
14:46:19 <danbri> regarding review, the next rev of schema.org will have Datasets vocab, ... which is somewhat DCAT-derived. Hopefully we can use that to drum up review comments (and revise in future if DCAT changes)
Dan Brickley: regarding review, the next rev of schema.org will have Datasets vocab, ... which is somewhat DCAT-derived. Hopefully we can use that to drum up review comments (and revise in future if DCAT changes) ←
14:47:25 <Zakim> + +1.571.331.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.571.331.aacc ←
14:47:26 <Zakim> -bhyland
Zakim IRC Bot: -bhyland ←
14:47:40 <bhyland> zakim, aacc is me
Bernadette Hyland: zakim, aacc is me ←
14:47:40 <Zakim> +bhyland; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bhyland; got it ←
14:47:41 <HadleyBeeman> q?
Hadley Beeman: q? ←
14:47:43 <MakxDekkers> http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description
Makx Dekkers: http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description ←
14:47:45 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
14:48:12 <PhilA> MakxDekkers: was talking about his forthcoming work on developing a profile for DCAT that will be used by data portals in Europe. Details (and invitation to join) at http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description
Makx Dekkers: was talking about his forthcoming work on developing a profile for DCAT that will be used by data portals in Europe. Details (and invitation to join) at http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/dcat_application_profile/description [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ] ←
14:48:38 <HadleyBeeman> danbri, do you have a mailing list for schema.org we could ask for help?
Hadley Beeman: danbri, do you have a mailing list for schema.org we could ask for help? ←
14:49:09 <gatemezi> This one: public-vocabs@w3.org
Ghislain Atemezing: This one: public-vocabs@w3.org ←
14:49:20 <PhilA> gatemezi: beat me to it http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/
Ghislain Atemezing: beat me to it http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/ [ Scribe Assist by Phil Archer ] ←
14:49:24 <james> DaveReynolds: will propose additional lists within W3C
Dave Reynolds: will propose additional lists within W3C ←
14:49:26 <james> Topic: Status of ORG and the PROV WG
14:49:38 <DaveReynolds> Should notify at least public-lod@w3.org and semantic-web@w3.org about the LC vocabs
Dave Reynolds: Should notify at least public-lod@w3.org and semantic-web@w3.org about the LC vocabs ←
14:50:17 <danbri> yes, public-vocabs
Dan Brickley: yes, public-vocabs ←
14:50:42 <danbri> there's been some discussion w/ ivan et al., on whether a separate list that is explicitly and only for schema.org would be useful
Dan Brickley: there's been some discussion w/ ivan et al., on whether a separate list that is explicitly and only for schema.org would be useful ←
14:50:46 <PhilA> q+ to ask about UKGovLD
Phil Archer: q+ to ask about UKGovLD ←
14:52:09 <james> administrative process discussion re: whether ORG is in LC or not
administrative process discussion re: whether ORG is in LC or not ←
14:52:32 <james> and/or how long ORG has been in LC
and/or how long ORG has been in LC ←
14:52:56 <gatemezi> Some other mailing lists : Public List, lod2 <lod2@lists.okfn.org>, open-government <open-government@lists.okfn.org>, public-gld-wg <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, public-egov-ig <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, euopendata@lists.okfn.org, mydata-open-data@lists.okfn.org, okfn-nl@lists.okfn.org, school-of-data@lists.okfn.org
Ghislain Atemezing: Some other mailing lists : Public List, lod2 <lod2@lists.okfn.org>, open-government <open-government@lists.okfn.org>, public-gld-wg <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, public-egov-ig <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, euopendata@lists.okfn.org, mydata-open-data@lists.okfn.org, okfn-nl@lists.okfn.org, school-of-data@lists.okfn.org ←
14:53:39 <HadleyBeeman> gatemezi, I sent the info to open-government <mailto:open-government@lists.okfn.org>, public-gld-wg <mailto:public-gld-wg@w3.org>, public-egov-ig <mailto:public-egov-ig@w3.org>. The others would be great though.
Hadley Beeman: gatemezi, I sent the info to open-government <mailto:open-government@lists.okfn.org>, public-gld-wg <mailto:public-gld-wg@w3.org>, public-egov-ig <mailto:public-egov-ig@w3.org>. The others would be great though. ←
14:53:59 <james> rough consensus is that ORG is respecting process
rough consensus is that ORG is respecting process ←
14:54:41 <james> DaveReynolds: summarizing the back-and-forth between ORG and PROV around PROV's feedback and responses to GLD's comments
Dave Reynolds: summarizing the back-and-forth between ORG and PROV around PROV's feedback and responses to GLD's comments ←
14:54:55 <james> DaveReynolds: waiting to hear back from PROV re: his last response to their comments
Dave Reynolds: waiting to hear back from PROV re: his last response to their comments ←
14:56:45 <james> HadleyBeeman: will add this point (Status of ORG and the PROV WG) to next week's agenda, to check that we follow up with PROV by then
Hadley Beeman: will add this point (Status of ORG and the PROV WG) to next week's agenda, to check that we follow up with PROV by then ←
14:57:39 <james> bhyland: please update GLD wiki page to point to gld comments list, so that it is clear that feedback should go there
Bernadette Hyland: please update GLD wiki page to point to gld comments list, so that it is clear that feedback should go there ←
14:58:36 <james> HadleyBeeman: the gld comments list has been included in outreach emails and in many of the documents of the deliverables
Hadley Beeman: the gld comments list has been included in outreach emails and in many of the documents of the deliverables ←
14:59:27 <HadleyBeeman> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html
Hadley Beeman: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html ←
14:59:36 <PhilA> q-
Phil Archer: q- ←
14:59:42 <DaveReynolds> q-
Dave Reynolds: q- ←
15:00:09 <james> ACTION: bhyland to fix the comments email address on the LD glossary document
ACTION: bhyland to fix the comments email address on the LD glossary document ←
15:00:09 <trackbot> Created ACTION-106 - Fix the comments email address on the LD glossary document [on Bernadette Hyland - due 2013-03-28].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-106 - Fix the comments email address on the LD glossary document [on Bernadette Hyland - due 2013-03-28]. ←
15:00:46 <HadleyBeeman> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable
Hadley Beeman: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/BP_Timetable ←
15:00:56 <Zakim> -bhyland
Zakim IRC Bot: -bhyland ←
15:01:03 <DaveReynolds> q+
Dave Reynolds: q+ ←
15:01:44 <james> Topic: New publication timetable for Best Practices
15:02:41 <DaveReynolds> q-
Dave Reynolds: q- ←
15:03:05 <james> HadleyBeeman: may need to push Best Practices timetable back a few days, need to hear from bhyland
Hadley Beeman: may need to push Best Practices timetable back a few days, need to hear from bhyland ←
15:03:29 <MakxDekkers> +q
Makx Dekkers: +q ←
15:03:49 <james> MakxDekkers: how many people are coming to Dublin?
Makx Dekkers: how many people are coming to Dublin? ←
15:03:58 <PhilA> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/F2F3
Phil Archer: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/F2F3 ←
15:04:23 <MakxDekkers> OK thanks
Makx Dekkers: OK thanks ←
15:04:59 <MakxDekkers> Move me to "expected in person", thanks
Makx Dekkers: Move me to "expected in person", thanks ←
15:04:59 <Zakim> -TallTed
Zakim IRC Bot: -TallTed ←
15:05:50 <Zakim> -PhilA
Zakim IRC Bot: -PhilA ←
15:05:52 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen
Zakim IRC Bot: -BartvanLeeuwen ←
15:05:54 <Zakim> -gatemezi
Zakim IRC Bot: -gatemezi ←
15:05:55 <Zakim> -mike_pendleton
Zakim IRC Bot: -mike_pendleton ←
15:05:56 <Zakim> -MakxDekkers
Zakim IRC Bot: -MakxDekkers ←
15:05:58 <Zakim> -DaveReynolds
Zakim IRC Bot: -DaveReynolds ←
15:06:01 <Zakim> -martinA
Zakim IRC Bot: -martinA ←
15:06:03 <PhilA> rrsagent, make logs public
Phil Archer: rrsagent, make logs public ←
15:06:03 <james> rrsagent, set logs world-visible
rrsagent, set logs world-visible ←
15:06:06 <james> rrsagent, make minutes
rrsagent, make minutes ←
15:06:06 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/21-gld-minutes.html james
RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/03/21-gld-minutes.html james ←
15:06:27 <Zakim> -MariosMeimaris
Zakim IRC Bot: -MariosMeimaris ←
15:06:28 <Zakim> -james
Zakim IRC Bot: -james ←
15:06:29 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman ←
15:06:30 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended ←
15:06:30 <Zakim> Attendees were BartvanLeeuwen, HadleyBeeman, PhilA, TallTed, MariosMeimaris, james, DaveReynolds, Sandro, martinA, +35386100aaaa, gld, mike_pendleton, bhyland, +352.6.2.1.1.9.aabb,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were BartvanLeeuwen, HadleyBeeman, PhilA, TallTed, MariosMeimaris, james, DaveReynolds, Sandro, martinA, +35386100aaaa, gld, mike_pendleton, bhyland, +352.6.2.1.1.9.aabb, ←
15:06:30 <Zakim> ... MakxDekkers, gatemezi, +1.571.331.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: ... MakxDekkers, gatemezi, +1.571.331.aacc ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#2) generated 2013-04-01 14:06:10 UTC by 'sandro', comments: None