Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference

Minutes of 04 October 2012

Agenda
http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20121004
Seen
Agis Papantoniou, Bart van Leeuwen, Benedikt Kaempgen, Bernadette Hyland, Biplav Srivastava, Boris Villazón-Terrazas, Dave Reynolds, George Thomas, Ghislain Atemezing, Hadley Beeman, James McKinney, Jindřich Mynarz, John Erickson, Martín Álvarez, Phil Archer, Sandro Hawke, Tina Gheen
Chair
George Thomas
Scribe
Hadley Beeman
IRC Log
Original and Editable Wiki Version
Resolutions
  1. CLOSE ISSUE-36. RADion will not be further pursued. link
Topics
13:55:09 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-irc

RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-irc

13:55:11 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world

Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world

13:55:13 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GLD

Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be GLD

13:55:13 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes

Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes

13:55:14 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
13:55:14 <trackbot> Date: 04 October 2012
13:55:44 <George> AGENDA: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20121004
13:56:14 <George> Chair: George
13:56:43 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started

Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started

13:56:49 <Zakim> + +1.518.276.aaaa

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.518.276.aaaa

13:57:04 <olyerickson> Zakim, aaaa is me.

John Erickson: Zakim, aaaa is me.

13:57:04 <Zakim> +olyerickson; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +olyerickson; got it

13:57:25 <Zakim> +??P4

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P4

13:57:34 <Zakim> -??P4

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P4

13:57:48 <Zakim> + +91.80.67.84.aabb

Zakim IRC Bot: + +91.80.67.84.aabb

13:58:42 <james> hello all, i'm new to the WG. @Zakim, are you having the bot call participants, or authorizing certain numbers to call in?

James McKinney: hello all, i'm new to the WG. @Zakim, are you having the bot call participants, or authorizing certain numbers to call in?

13:59:08 <Zakim> +George_Thomas

Zakim IRC Bot: +George_Thomas

14:00:01 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.93.00.aacc

14:00:04 <Zakim> +??P16

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P16

14:00:24 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

14:00:36 <Zakim> + +34.91.336.aadd

Zakim IRC Bot: + +34.91.336.aadd

14:00:43 <Zakim> +davidwood

Zakim IRC Bot: +davidwood

14:00:52 <boris> zakim, aadd is me

Boris Villazón-Terrazas: zakim, aadd is me

14:00:53 <Zakim> +boris; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +boris; got it

14:01:08 <Zakim> +Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: +Sandro

14:01:21 <bhyland> good day all

Bernadette Hyland: good day all

14:01:21 <George> Zakim, who is here?

George Thomas: Zakim, who is here?

14:01:24 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro

14:01:29 <Zakim> On IRC I see PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro

14:02:36 <Zakim> +??P35

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P35

14:02:38 <George> Zakim, who is here?

George Thomas: Zakim, who is here?

14:02:43 <martinAlvarez> zakim, ??p35 is me

Martín Álvarez: zakim, ??p35 is me

14:02:49 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro, ??P35

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro, ??P35

14:02:58 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

14:03:05 <Zakim> +martinAlvarez; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +martinAlvarez; got it

14:03:08 <Zakim> +??P33

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P33

14:03:14 <sandro> zakim, who is talking?

Sandro Hawke: zakim, who is talking?

14:03:14 <bhyland> zakim, who is talking?

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, who is talking?

14:03:14 <martinAlvarez> zakim, mute me

Martín Álvarez: zakim, mute me

14:03:16 <Zakim> On IRC I see james_, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis,

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see james_, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis,

14:03:19 <bhyland> ouch!!

Bernadette Hyland: ouch!!

14:03:20 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??P33 is me

Bart van Leeuwen: Zakim, ??P33 is me

14:03:21 <Zakim> ... MacTed, trackbot, sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: ... MacTed, trackbot, sandro

14:03:28 <Zakim> +??P39

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P39

14:03:41 <Zakim> martinAlvarez should now be muted

Zakim IRC Bot: martinAlvarez should now be muted

14:03:43 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: -[IPcaller]

14:03:49 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +BartvanLeeuwen; got it

14:03:53 <Zakim> sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (15%), +33.4.93.00.aacc (77%), ??P39 (83%)

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (15%), +33.4.93.00.aacc (77%), ??P39 (83%)

14:04:07 <Zakim> -??P39

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P39

14:04:08 <sandro> zakim, drop aacc

Sandro Hawke: zakim, drop aacc

14:04:12 <Zakim> bhyland, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (37%), George_Thomas (19%), davidwood (15%), Sandro (49%)

Zakim IRC Bot: bhyland, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (37%), George_Thomas (19%), davidwood (15%), Sandro (49%)

14:04:20 <bhyland> zakim, davidwood is me

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, davidwood is me

14:04:31 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aacc

Zakim IRC Bot: - +33.4.93.00.aacc

14:04:34 <sandro> zakim, who is on the call?

Sandro Hawke: zakim, who is on the call?

14:04:43 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller]

14:04:45 <Zakim> sorry, sandro, I do not see a party named 'aacc'

Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, sandro, I do not see a party named 'aacc'

14:04:57 <Zakim> +bhyland; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +bhyland; got it

14:05:01 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, [IPcaller]

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, [IPcaller]

14:05:25 <james> Zakim, ??P39 is me

James McKinney: Zakim, ??P39 is me

14:05:25 <Zakim> I already had ??P39 as Mike, james

Zakim IRC Bot: I already had ??P39 as Mike, james

14:05:40 <gatemezi> Hi all.

Ghislain Atemezing: Hi all.

14:05:48 <Biplav> zakim, +91.80.67.84.aabb is me

Biplav Srivastava: zakim, +91.80.67.84.aabb is me

14:05:51 <Zakim> +Biplav; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +Biplav; got it

14:06:11 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller.a]

14:06:24 <PhilA2> zakim, IPcaller.a is me

Phil Archer: zakim, IPcaller.a is me

14:06:24 <Zakim> +PhilA2; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +PhilA2; got it

14:06:47 <sandro> Zakim, IPcaller is james

Sandro Hawke: Zakim, IPcaller is james

14:06:47 <Zakim> +james; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +james; got it

14:07:07 <sandro> queue=

Sandro Hawke: queue=

14:07:10 <Zakim> + +1.440.389.aaee

Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.440.389.aaee

14:07:18 <olyerickson> OpenNorth http://opennorth.ca/

John Erickson: OpenNorth http://opennorth.ca/

14:07:27 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, aaee is me

Hadley Beeman: zakim, aaee is me

14:07:28 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +HadleyBeeman; got it

14:07:31 <sandro> not yet, PhilA2

Sandro Hawke: not yet, PhilA2

14:07:38 <George> Welcome James - Exec Dir of OpenNorth

George Thomas: Welcome James - Exec Dir of OpenNorth

14:07:38 <olyerickson> Topic: Noob Intros

1. Noob Intros

14:07:50 <bhyland> Welcome James, thanks for joining.

Bernadette Hyland: Welcome James, thanks for joining.

14:07:53 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aaff

Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.93.00.aaff

14:08:09 <sandro> zakim, drop aaff

Sandro Hawke: zakim, drop aaff

14:08:09 <Zakim> +33.4.93.00.aaff is being disconnected

Zakim IRC Bot: +33.4.93.00.aaff is being disconnected

14:08:10 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aaff

Zakim IRC Bot: - +33.4.93.00.aaff

14:09:06 <olyerickson> Zakim, please armor me against scribe roulette

John Erickson: Zakim, please armor me against scribe roulette

14:09:06 <Zakim> I don't understand 'please armor me against scribe roulette', olyerickson

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'please armor me against scribe roulette', olyerickson

14:09:16 <George> zakim, pick a victim

George Thomas: zakim, pick a victim

14:09:16 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose olyerickson

Zakim IRC Bot: Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose olyerickson

14:09:23 <olyerickson> PMSL

John Erickson: PMSL

14:09:24 <HadleyBeeman> I'll do it

Hadley Beeman: I'll do it

14:09:41 <sandro> scribe: HadleyBeeman

(Scribe set to Hadley Beeman)

14:10:01 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aagg

Zakim IRC Bot: + +33.4.93.00.aagg

14:10:02 <Biplav> I can volunteer as well for future.

Biplav Srivastava: I can volunteer as well for future.

14:10:06 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: welcome

2. welcome

14:10:17 <sandro> zakim, drop aagg

Sandro Hawke: zakim, drop aagg

14:10:17 <Zakim> +33.4.93.00.aagg is being disconnected

Zakim IRC Bot: +33.4.93.00.aagg is being disconnected

14:10:18 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aagg

Zakim IRC Bot: - +33.4.93.00.aagg

14:10:23 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, who is on the call

14:10:23 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland

14:10:39 <bhyland> zakim, you are too d*&^ picky!

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, you are too d*&^ picky!

14:10:39 <Zakim> I don't understand 'you are too d*&^ picky!', bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'you are too d*&^ picky!', bhyland

14:10:45 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, who is on the call?

14:10:45 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman

14:11:35 <PhilA2> agis ?

Phil Archer: agis ?

14:11:37 <sandro> gatemezi, is that you dialing in and ending us with us put on hold hearing french music?

Sandro Hawke: gatemezi, is that you dialing in and ending us with us put on hold hearing french music?

14:11:41 <PhilA2> Are you there?

Phil Archer: Are you there?

14:11:42 <bhyland> @Ghislain, we drop you because we're getting interrupted with lengthy intro and music from your lovely French operator.

Bernadette Hyland: @Ghislain, we drop you because we're getting interrupted with lengthy intro and music from your lovely French operator.

14:11:54 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: accepting last week's minutes

3. accepting last week's minutes

14:11:59 <olyerickson> Abstains...

John Erickson: Abstains...

14:12:01 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1

Bart van Leeuwen: +1

14:12:07 <agis> hello all! agis as usual has problems with the SIP configuration:-)

Agis Papantoniou: hello all! agis as usual has problems with the SIP configuration:-)

14:12:10 <PhilA2> -> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-27 Last week's minutes

Phil Archer: -> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-27 Last week's minutes

14:12:11 <bhyland> q+

Bernadette Hyland: q+

14:12:47 <George> ack bhyland

George Thomas: ack bhyland

14:13:07 <jmynarz> Zakim, ??P16 is me

Jindřich Mynarz: Zakim, ??P16 is me

14:13:07 <Zakim> +jmynarz; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +jmynarz; got it

14:13:13 <PhilA2> q+

Phil Archer: q+

14:13:32 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila2

ack phila2

14:13:47 <sandro> bhyland: As I recall, last week we decided not to do Geo, but I don't see that recorded in the minutes.

Bernadette Hyland: As I recall, last week we decided not to do Geo, but I don't see that recorded in the minutes. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:13:54 <Zakim> + +49.721.aahh

Zakim IRC Bot: + +49.721.aahh

14:14:23 <sandro> PhilA2: I'd rather if we said "not now" instead of "we're never going to do it"

Phil Archer: I'd rather if we said "not now" instead of "we're never going to do it" [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:14:23 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:14:24 <HadleyBeeman> phila2: we decided not to NEVER do anything with location, but for the time being not to. Note the existence of the community group that is working on it.

Phil Archer: we decided not to NEVER do anything with people, but for the time being not to. Note the existence of the community group that is working on it.

14:14:32 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, who is here

Benedikt Kaempgen: zakim, who is here

14:14:32 <Zakim> BenediktKaempgen, you need to end that query with '?'

Zakim IRC Bot: BenediktKaempgen, you need to end that query with '?'

14:14:37 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, who is here?

Benedikt Kaempgen: zakim, who is here?

14:14:37 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,

14:14:40 <Zakim> ... +49.721.aahh

Zakim IRC Bot: ... +49.721.aahh

14:14:40 <Zakim> On IRC I see BenediktKaempgen, HadleyBeeman, james, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson,

Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see BenediktKaempgen, HadleyBeeman, james, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson,

14:14:42 <Zakim> ... gatemezi, George, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: ... gatemezi, George, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro

14:14:53 <PhilA2> s/with location/with people/
14:14:54 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, aahh is BenediktKaempgen

Benedikt Kaempgen: zakim, aahh is BenediktKaempgen

14:14:54 <Zakim> +BenediktKaempgen; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +BenediktKaempgen; got it

14:15:08 <bhyland> Proposed: We acknowledge that Geography and Spatial Vocab is listed as optional on the charter.  There was some initial work on a wiki page but the volunteers have since ceased attending the GLD WG.

PROPOSED: We acknowledge that Geography and Spatial Vocab is listed as optional on the charter. There was some initial work on a wiki page but the volunteers have since ceased attending the GLD WG.

14:15:25 <sandro> bhyland: We acknowledge that Geo is listed as optional in the charter.  There was some initial work, on a wiki page, but the volunteers are not longer participating, and we acknowledge that we're not going to get to it within the charter timeframe.

Bernadette Hyland: We acknowledge that Geo is listed as optional in the charter. There was some initial work, on a wiki page, but the volunteers are not longer participating, and we acknowledge that we're not going to get to it within the charter timeframe. [ Scribe Assist by Sandro Hawke ]

14:15:32 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:15:54 <bhyland> With that noted, I +1 last week's minutes

Bernadette Hyland: With that noted, I +1 last week's minutes

14:16:38 <gatemezi> @bhyland: You mean the initial volunteers? because there still volunteers for Geo Vocab in the group

Ghislain Atemezing: @bhyland: You mean the initial volunteers? because there still volunteers for Geo Vocab in the group

14:16:43 <George> Topic: RADion

4. RADion

14:16:48 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA2:  There was a suggestion on the mailing list that proposed the working group not take on RADion as a work item.

Phil Archer: There was a suggestion on the mailing list that proposed the working group not take on RADion as a work item.

14:17:09 <HadleyBeeman> ... If it exists elsewhere, the group will note its existence.

... If it exists elsewhere, the group will note its existence.

14:17:17 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:17:18 <Zakim> +[LC]

Zakim IRC Bot: +[LC]

14:17:30 <tinagheen> Zakim, [LC] is me

Tina Gheen: Zakim, [LC] is me

14:17:30 <Zakim> +tinagheen; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +tinagheen; got it

14:17:42 <gatemezi> +1 to accept last week's minute

Ghislain Atemezing: +1 to accept last week's minute

14:18:02 <PhilA2> -> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html new version

Phil Archer: -> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html new version of ADMS

14:18:09 <sandro> gatemezi, are you suggesting that the group has the time/energy/staff for doing a geo vocab?      if so, that's worth talking over with the chairs.

Sandro Hawke: gatemezi, are you suggesting that the group has the time/energy/staff for doing a geo vocab? if so, that's worth talking over with the chairs.

14:18:18 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA2:  Spent some time on ADMS (Gofran is co-editor on that).  When the chair designates, we can take it to first public working draft

Phil Archer: Spent some time on ADMS (Gofran is co-editor on that). When the chair designates, we can take it to first public working draft

14:18:21 <PhilA2> s/new version/new version of ADMS/
14:18:40 <PhilA2> Co-editor of ADMS is Gofran

Phil Archer: Co-editor of ADMS is Gofran

14:19:19 <PhilA2> Last week's meeting announced that Gofran Shukair of DERI, NUIG will be co-editor of ADMS, the latest editor's draft of which is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html

Phil Archer: Last week's meeting announced that Gofran Shukair of DERI, NUIG will be co-editor of ADMS, the latest editor's draft of which is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html

14:19:24 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  There was one area of ORG added in response to Bart's suggestions several months ago.  Doc polished, ready to review.  Sent out last week.

Dave Reynolds: There was one area of ORG added in response to Bart's suggestions several months ago. Doc polished, ready to review. Sent out last week.

14:20:19 <HadleyBeeman> …Cygri has done a detailed review, made editorial suggestions.  More work than expected for today.  Will sort that over the weekend for last-call vote early next week.

…Cygri has done a detailed review, made editorial suggestions. More work than expected for today. Will sort that over the weekend for review in advance of last-call vote early next week.

14:20:46 <HadleyBeeman> s/for last-call vote/for review in advance of last-call vote
14:21:10 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland:  why a possible restructure?

Bernadette Hyland: why a possible restructure?

14:21:10 <BartvanLeeuwen> q+

Bart van Leeuwen: q+

14:21:39 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: Possibly reorganise vocab references and materials to be at the end.

Dave Reynolds: Possibly reorganise vocab references and materials to be at the end.

14:22:10 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland: Is there precedent here we can follow?

Bernadette Hyland: Is there precedent here we can follow?

14:22:43 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  This is a preference, but not an unreasonable one.  That's a normal way to do it.  I like to see it intermixed myself.

Dave Reynolds: This is a preference, but not an unreasonable one. That's a normal way to do it. I like to see it intermixed myself.

14:23:16 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland:  I think it's well-structured as it is.  I'd hate to see you have to do a lot of work at this point.

Bernadette Hyland: I think it's well-structured as it is. I'd hate to see you have to do a lot of work at this point.

14:24:02 <PhilA2> I agree there is no "definitive style" for vocabularies. +1 to Dave retaining the structure that has worked for this well-used ontology to date

Phil Archer: I agree there is no "definitive style" for vocabularies. +1 to Dave retaining the structure that has worked for this well-used ontology to date

14:24:08 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Cygri has said this may not be a critical thing.  I'll spend a bit of time looking at it to get a sense of how much work it would be and still be coherent.

Dave Reynolds: Cygri has said this may not be a critical thing. I'll spend a bit of time looking at it to get a sense of how much work it would be and still be coherent.

14:24:34 <gatemezi> +1 to bhyland point of not having too much work to reorganize ORG

Ghislain Atemezing: +1 to bhyland point of not having too much work to reorganize ORG

14:24:42 <olyerickson> Sounds like cygri has made a suggestion on non-critical re-structuring that DaveReynolds is not opposed to...

John Erickson: Sounds like cygri has made a suggestion on non-critical re-structuring that DaveReynolds is not opposed to...

14:25:20 <HadleyBeeman> George:  That sounds like a good approach.  Mhausenblas also volunteered to review it.  Health.data.gov may also be relevant, using ORG already.

George Thomas: That sounds like a good approach. mhausenblas also volunteered to review it. Health.data.gov may also be relevant, using ORG already.

14:25:26 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila2

ack phila2

14:25:31 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila

ack phila

14:25:34 <bhyland> @DaveReynolds, I leave it to your judgement. For the record, I think it is well structured & readable as structured but if you're happy enough to make changes, thank you.

Bernadette Hyland: @DaveReynolds, I leave it to your judgement. For the record, I think it is well structured & readable as structured but if you're happy enough to make changes, thank you.

14:26:00 <HadleyBeeman> phila:  There is no rule book on how to set out a vocabulary, so I'm happy to see flexibility on this.  No need to conform with a standard that doesn't exist.

Phil Archer: There is no rule book on how to set out a vocabulary, so I'm happy to see flexibility on this. No need to conform with a standard that doesn't exist.

14:26:05 <HadleyBeeman> ack bartvanleeuwen

ack bartvanleeuwen

14:26:13 <gatemezi> s/Mhausenblas/mhausenblas
14:26:55 <HadleyBeeman> bartvanleeuwen: we had a 2-day meeting with the source of my changes. We were able to model everything we wanted to with the ORG ontology

Bart van Leeuwen: we had a 2-day meeting with the source of my changes. We were able to model everything we wanted to with the ORG ontology

14:27:15 <HadleyBeeman> George:  we should close action 78 as completed.  79 we'll leave for the additional work

George Thomas: we should close ACTION-78 as completed. 79 we'll leave for the additional work

14:27:48 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  re issue 35… should we close that as well?  Bartsvanleeuwen was the test-case for that, so if he's able to address that, then we're set.

Dave Reynolds: re ISSUE-35… should we close that as well? Bartsvanleeuwen was the test-case for that, so if he's able to address that, then we're set.

14:28:13 <bhyland> @HadleyBeaman … do you know how to close issues?  I can do if you like

Bernadette Hyland: @HadleyBeaman … do you know how to close issues? I can do if you like

14:28:17 <HadleyBeeman> … The question of OPMV and ProvO:

… The question of OPMV and ProvO:

14:29:13 <HadleyBeeman> … Use case:  Where two companies are merging, or a new company is created.  Change history.  We use the OPMV vocabulary for that.

… Use case: Where two companies are merging, or a new company is created. Change history. We use the OPMV vocabulary for that.

14:29:17 <bhyland> @Hadley, done. Recorded: closed: "Addressed and Bart has been successful in using ORG to satisfy his the noted cases.?

Bernadette Hyland: @Hadley, done. Recorded: closed: "Addressed and Bart has been successful in using ORG to satisfy his the noted cases."

14:29:24 <bhyland> s/?/"
14:29:59 <sandro> q?

Sandro Hawke: q?

14:30:10 <HadleyBeeman> … Provenance working group has produced Prov-O.  Names are different, but the structure is the same.  Question for us:  can we switch vocabularies.  Issues:  timescales between the two working groups, and the existing uses in the wild.

… Provenance working group has produced Prov-O. Names are different, but the structure is the same. Question for us: can we switch vocabularies. Issues: timescales between the two working groups, and the existing uses in the wild.

14:30:34 <olyerickson> OPMV http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html

John Erickson: OPMV http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html

14:30:55 <HadleyBeeman> … Not aware of anyone dependent on the vocabulary as it is.  At some point, there may be a mapping between OPMV and PROV-O.

… Not aware of anyone dependent on the vocabulary as it is. At some point, there may be a mapping between OPMV and PROV-O.

14:31:11 <HadleyBeeman> … If anyone can identify a problem here, now is a good time to bring it up

… If anyone can identify a problem here, now is a good time to bring it up

14:31:28 <sandro> zakim, who is talking?

Sandro Hawke: zakim, who is talking?

14:31:38 <Zakim> sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: George_Thomas (4%), DaveReynolds (80%)

Zakim IRC Bot: sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: George_Thomas (4%), DaveReynolds (80%)

14:31:47 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, who is on the call

14:31:47 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland

14:31:54 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?

Bernadette Hyland: zakim, who is on the call?

14:31:54 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,

Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,

14:31:58 <Zakim> ... BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen

Zakim IRC Bot: ... BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen

14:32:00 <HadleyBeeman> … We need a formal reference to Prov-O in document, and then to update the ontology to reflect that.

… We need a formal reference to Prov-O in document, and then to update the ontology to reflect that.

14:32:13 <HadleyBeeman> s/we need/we would need

s/we need/we would need (warning: replacement failed)

14:32:36 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  Is the term part of ORG, or a sub-class kind of thing?

Sandro Hawke: Is the term part of ORG, or a sub-class kind of thing?

14:32:58 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Sub-class.  Suggests other terms from that vocabulary that could be used.

Dave Reynolds: Sub-class. Suggests other terms from that vocabulary that could be used.

14:33:10 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:33:35 <HadleyBeeman> Sandro:  if it were just the vocabulary, I was wondering about sub-classing both of them.

Sandro Hawke: if it were just the vocabulary, I was wondering about sub-classing both of them.

14:34:08 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  That would be reasonable.  We still need to satisfy the Prov-O piece.  Still need to reference that in the formal document.

Dave Reynolds: That would be reasonable. We still need to satisfy the Prov-O piece. Still need to reference that in the formal document.

14:34:38 <HadleyBeeman> Sandro:  Just want to make sure we aren't causing problems for anyone already using OPMV

Sandro Hawke: Just want to make sure we aren't causing problems for anyone already using OPMV

14:35:04 <HadleyBeeman> … ORG uses everything in its own namespace.  Why is this a sub-class rather than just using the other term?

… ORG uses everything in its own namespace. Why is this a sub-class rather than just using the other term?

14:35:15 <PhilA2> q+ To raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)

Phil Archer: q+ To raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)

14:35:16 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  because it's actually a specialisation.

Dave Reynolds: because it's actually a specialisation.

14:36:51 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  We could put this part "at risk".  Prov-O is moving along pretty well now.

Sandro Hawke: We could put this part "at risk". Prov-O is moving along pretty well now.

14:37:02 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  How to designate this?  Editorial notes: a change in the vocabulary intended to be backward compatible?

Dave Reynolds: How to designate this? Editorial notes: a change in the vocabulary intended to be backward compatible?

14:37:17 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  A usage note or something like that.  A list of changes in the appendix?

Sandro Hawke: A usage note or something like that. A list of changes in the appendix?

14:37:32 <HadleyBeeman> Davereynolds:  for last-call document, are we allowed editorial notes?

Dave Reynolds: for last-call document, are we allowed editorial notes?

14:37:37 <gatemezi> Could some one putting the link to the actual rdf file of the Prov-O ontology?

Ghislain Atemezing: Could some one putting the link to the actual rdf file of the Prov-O ontology?

14:37:42 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  I'm thinking of a style of note that would even proceed into recomendation

Sandro Hawke: I'm thinking of a style of note that would even proceed into recomendation

14:37:52 <PhilA2> (For background, if you flag a feature as being 'At Risk' it means that you can take it out after LC (although IIRC not at CR)

Phil Archer: (For background, if you flag a feature as being 'At Risk' it means that you can take it out after LC (although IIRC not at CR)

14:38:19 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila

ack phila

14:38:19 <Zakim> PhilA, you wanted to raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)

Zakim IRC Bot: PhilA, you wanted to raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)

14:38:56 <olyerickson> For the record: The specific section we were discussing was 10.1 Class: ChangeEvent http://bit.ly/QJy1AS

John Erickson: For the record: The specific section we were discussing was 10.1 Class: ChangeEvent http://bit.ly/QJy1AS

14:39:16 <HadleyBeeman> pHilA: concept of an identifier:  handled differently in ORG than in OPMV.

Phil Archer: concept of an identifier: handled differently in ORG than in OPMV.

14:40:39 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA: There are distinct bits of data about the identifier in ADMS — different to ORG.  Don't want to mess around with ORG, but we need to recognise that we have 2 other work items that refer to this identifier concept and we need to make sure they don't clash

Phil Archer: There are distinct bits of data about the identifier in ADMS — different to ORG. Don't want to mess around with ORG, but we need to recognise that we have 2 other work items that refer to this identifier concept and we need to make sure they don't clash

14:40:52 <bhyland> @Hadley, should I also close ISSUE-36 re: RADion as I see status is set to "Raised" but I think should go to "Closed" based on earlier discussion … did I understand that correctly??

Bernadette Hyland: @Hadley, should I also close ISSUE-36 re: RADion as I see status is set to "Raised" but I think should go to "Closed" based on earlier discussion … did I understand that correctly??

14:41:07 <bhyland> @Hadley, see http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/36

Bernadette Hyland: @Hadley, see http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/36

14:42:11 <PhilA2> -> The ADMS notion of a 'code' which includes the concept of an 'Identifier'

Phil Archer: -> The ADMS notion of a 'code' which includes the concept of an 'Identifier'

14:42:14 <PhilA2> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html#data-types

Phil Archer: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html#data-types

14:42:14 <olyerickson> Curious what the proposed PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" is http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html#Process

John Erickson: Curious what the proposed PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" is http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html#Process

14:42:24 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: Option 1: Change ORG to make identifier a resource value as well as a typed value.  Option 2:  create another one in ORG.  Option 3:  Leave this in place.  In doing legal entity, you'll define an interment rule.

Dave Reynolds: Option 1: Change ORG to make identifier a resource value as well as a typed value. Option 2: create another one in ORG. Option 3: Leave this in place. In doing legal entity, you'll define an interment rule.

14:43:40 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: that needs to be resolved before we vote on last call

Dave Reynolds: that needs to be resolved before we vote on last call

14:44:08 <Zakim> -james

Zakim IRC Bot: -james

14:44:38 <olyerickson> See http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/static.html#property--identifier

John Erickson: See http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/static.html#property--identifier

14:45:07 <Zakim> +??P17

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P17

14:45:46 <olyerickson> Q - Could we have a side-by-side comparison?

John Erickson: Q - Could we have a side-by-side comparison?

14:45:55 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds and PhilA are working out where conflicting recommendations to use SKOS notation in ADMS and ORG come up (with regard to identifiers)

DaveReynolds and PhilA2 are working out where conflicting recommendations to use SKOS notation in ADMS and ORG come up (with regard to identifiers)

14:46:19 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:46:58 <olyerickson> Proposal: Can we have a side-by-side comparison??

PROPOSED: Can we have a side-by-side comparison??

14:47:10 <HadleyBeeman> ACTION:  PHilA and DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line

ACTION: PHilA and DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line

14:47:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-80 - And DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line [on Phil Archer - due 2012-10-11].

Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-80 - And DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line [on Phil Archer - due 2012-10-11].

14:48:21 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:48:27 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: RADion

5. RADion

14:48:34 <james> zakim, ??P17 is me

James McKinney: zakim, ??P17 is me

14:48:34 <Zakim> +james; got it

Zakim IRC Bot: +james; got it

14:49:10 <PhilA2> -> Richard's proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Sep/0064.html

Phil Archer: -> Richard's proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Sep/0064.html

14:50:02 <BenediktKaempgen> @olyerickson PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" probably is prov:Activity

Benedikt Kaempgen: @olyerickson PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" probably is prov:Activity

14:50:16 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  To clarify, RADion is mostly an abstract way to think of things like software forges and data catalogues.  Anywhere you have lots of assets collected in a category or repository.

Phil Archer: To clarify, RADion is mostly an abstract way to think of things like software forges and data catalogues. Anywhere you have lots of assets collected in a category or repository.

14:50:34 <HadleyBeeman> …You'd subclass it, as DCAT does.  You'd rarely use it directly.

…You'd subclass it, as DCAT does. You'd rarely use it directly.

14:51:22 <HadleyBeeman> … Cygri is saying fine, it's there.  We don't have to think about it, except in seeing sublcasses (like DCAT and ADMS).  We could decide to accept that and not discuss RADion again

… Cygri is saying fine, it's there. We don't have to think about it, except in seeing sublcasses (like DCAT and ADMS). We could decide to accept that and not discuss RADion again

14:51:38 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1

Bart van Leeuwen: +1

14:51:41 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:51:41 <HadleyBeeman> bhyland:  Agreed, we are closing Issue 36?

Bernadette Hyland: Agreed, we are closing ISSUE-36?

14:51:45 <DaveReynolds> +0

Dave Reynolds: +0

14:52:51 <gatemezi> +1

Ghislain Atemezing: +1

14:52:54 <Zakim> +??P37

Zakim IRC Bot: +??P37

14:53:09 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:53:13 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Not opposing to close it, but the implication of this discussion is that we accept the conclusion that DCAT is a subclass… I wouldn't vote for it, but I"m not against it.  I abstain

Dave Reynolds: Not opposing to close it, but the implication of this discussion is that we accept the conclusion that DCAT is a subclass… I wouldn't vote for it, but I"m not against it. I abstain

14:53:20 <George> q?

George Thomas: q?

14:53:32 <james> q-

James McKinney: q-

14:53:38 <HadleyBeeman> ack ??P17

ack ??P17

14:54:14 <PhilA2> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG resolves that RADion is *not* a GLD-WG product. If the RADion editor makes a credible assertion that he is going to publish the RADion namespace document regardless through some other venue (SWIG, community group, Just Ask the Webmaster, ?), then GLD-WG will include mappings to RADion in the DCAT and ADMS RDFS files. and close Issue-36

Phil Archer: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG resolves that RADion is *not* a GLD-WG product. If the RADion editor makes a credible assertion that he is going to publish the RADion namespace document regardless through some other venue (SWIG, community group, Just Ask the Webmaster, ?), then GLD-WG will include mappings to RADion in the DCAT and ADMS RDFS files. and close ISSUE-36

14:54:25 <bhyland> Resolved to CLOSE ISSUE-36.  RADion will not be further pursued.

Bernadette Hyland: Resolved to CLOSE ISSUE-36. RADion will not be further pursued.

14:54:28 <Zakim> -??P37

Zakim IRC Bot: -??P37

14:54:32 <bhyland> +1

Bernadette Hyland: +1

14:54:41 <sandro> RESOLVED: CLOSE ISSUE-36.  RADion will not be further pursued.

RESOLVED: CLOSE ISSUE-36. RADion will not be further pursued.

14:55:12 <gatemezi> +1

Ghislain Atemezing: +1

14:55:31 <HadleyBeeman> Topic:  The larger ISA programme

6. The larger ISA programme

14:56:14 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Lots here, little time.  There was an agreement between Jeff Jaffe and the European Commission (with George, Bernadette, Sandro, Thomas and Phil) to take on some of these items that are coming from the EC work.

Phil Archer: Lots here, little time. There was an agreement between Jeff Jaffe and the European Commission (with George, Bernadette, Sandro, Thomas and Phil) to review the ISA Programme Vocabs for possible RECOMMENDATION track status. that are coming from the EC work.

14:56:23 <gatemezi> zakim, who is speaking?

Ghislain Atemezing: zakim, who is speaking?

14:56:34 <Zakim> gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: PhilA2 (30%)

Zakim IRC Bot: gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: PhilA22 (30%)

14:57:01 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:57:13 <bhyland> s/to take on some of these items/to review the ISA Programme Vocabs for possible RECOMMENDATION track status.
14:57:19 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA:  I'm trying to take the group along in our discussions (including the one we just had about RADion).  The ADMS spec is something we can take to first public working draft — but we need the group to buy in first.

Phil Archer: I'm trying to take the group along in our discussions (including the one we just had about RADion). The ADMS spec is something we can take to first public working draft — but we need the group to buy in first.

14:57:40 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  The EC has emailed us to express displeasure with our lack of expediency.

Phil Archer: The EC has emailed us to express displeasure with our lack of expediency.

14:58:12 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Some things are easy to handle.  We haven't published the Location Core Vocabulary because there is a community group to deal with that.  Chair should be set today.

Phil Archer: Some things are easy to handle. We haven't published the Location Core Vocabulary because there is a community group to deal with that. Chair should be set today.

14:58:23 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Some things just aren't a priority.  Not in use.

Phil Archer: Some things just aren't a priority. Not in use.

14:58:43 <HadleyBeeman> … The legal entity one is active and implemented.  There is demand.

… The legal entity one is active and implemented. There is demand.

14:58:56 <bhyland> q+

Bernadette Hyland: q+

14:59:06 <HadleyBeeman> … We haven't yet, in this group, brought this work into W3C space yet because we've been doing other things.  It's time.

… We haven't yet, in this group, brought this work into W3C space yet because we've been doing other things. It's time.

14:59:42 <HadleyBeeman> bhyland: Are there any people who could augment this activity either direct with ISA or complementary, because we're short on time on this?  Are there 1-2 other reviewers outside the working group we could get to help?

Bernadette Hyland: Are there any people who could augment this activity either direct with ISA or complementary, because we're short on time on this? Are there 1-2 other reviewers outside the working group we could get to help?

15:00:13 <olyerickson> HadleyBeeman: Note that I updated ACTION-80 to better reflect what is being asked...

Hadley Beeman: Note that I updated ACTION-80 to better reflect what is being asked... [ Scribe Assist by John Erickson ]

15:00:22 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA2:  I would say that everything that was produced and handed over was done by a working group, just not THIS working group.

Phil Archer: I would say that everything that was produced and handed over was done by a working group, just not THIS working group.

15:00:48 <HadleyBeeman> … The Commission is not putting pressure on individuals, but it is on the W3C.

… The Commission is not putting pressure on individuals, but it is on the W3C.

15:01:18 <HadleyBeeman> George:  Phil, Sandro, Bernadette and I will discuss this more next week.  We'll see what we can do to progress this.

George Thomas: Phil, Sandro, Bernadette and I will discuss this more next week. We'll see what we can do to progress this.

15:01:32 <bhyland> At the end of the day, we did agree to *review it* and we agreed 9 months ago.  I feel we owe a thorough review & indication as to whether this is "on our plate" or decidedly "off our plate" (which would be very unfortunate).

Bernadette Hyland: At the end of the day, we did agree to *review it* and we agreed 9 months ago. I feel we owe a thorough review & indication as to whether this is "on our plate" or decidedly "off our plate" (which would be very unfortunate).

15:01:46 <olyerickson> Zakim, choose a chairperson...

John Erickson: Zakim, choose a chairperson...

15:01:46 <Zakim> I don't understand 'choose a chairperson', olyerickson

Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'choose a chairperson', olyerickson

15:01:57 <BenediktKaempgen> bye

Benedikt Kaempgen: bye

15:01:58 <Zakim> -martinAlvarez

Zakim IRC Bot: -martinAlvarez

15:01:59 <Biplav> Thanks

Biplav Srivastava: Thanks

15:02:02 <Zakim> -Sandro

Zakim IRC Bot: -Sandro

15:02:06 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman

Zakim IRC Bot: -HadleyBeeman

15:02:08 <Zakim> -olyerickson

Zakim IRC Bot: -olyerickson

15:02:08 <bhyland> @PhilA, do you have a minute for a call?

Bernadette Hyland: @PhilA, do you have a minute for a call?

15:02:10 <Zakim> -PhilA2

Zakim IRC Bot: -PhilA2

15:02:14 <Zakim> -bhyland

Zakim IRC Bot: -bhyland

15:02:18 <Zakim> -james

Zakim IRC Bot: -james

15:02:24 <Zakim> -tinagheen

Zakim IRC Bot: -tinagheen

15:02:25 <Zakim> -BenediktKaempgen

Zakim IRC Bot: -BenediktKaempgen

15:02:27 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen

Zakim IRC Bot: -BartvanLeeuwen

15:02:27 <gatemezi> Chair: George
15:02:31 <Zakim> -DaveReynolds

Zakim IRC Bot: -DaveReynolds

15:02:33 <bhyland> @phil, skype?

Bernadette Hyland: @phil, skype?

15:02:35 <Zakim> -boris

Zakim IRC Bot: -boris

15:02:42 <Zakim> -George_Thomas

Zakim IRC Bot: -George_Thomas

15:02:49 <Zakim> -jmynarz

Zakim IRC Bot: -jmynarz

15:02:51 <Zakim> -Biplav

Zakim IRC Bot: -Biplav

15:02:53 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended

Zakim IRC Bot: T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended

15:02:54 <gatemezi> Thanks, all!

Ghislain Atemezing: Thanks, all!

15:02:55 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.518.276.aaaa, olyerickson, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, DaveReynolds, +34.91.336.aadd, boris, Sandro, martinAlvarez, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, Biplav, PhilA2,

Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were +1.518.276.aaaa, olyerickson, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, DaveReynolds, +34.91.336.aadd, boris, Sandro, martinAlvarez, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, Biplav, PhilA2,

15:02:58 <Zakim> ... james, +1.440.389.aaee, HadleyBeeman, +33.4.93.00.aaff, +33.4.93.00.aagg, jmynarz, +49.721.aahh, BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen

Zakim IRC Bot: ... james, +1.440.389.aaee, HadleyBeeman, +33.4.93.00.aaff, +33.4.93.00.aagg, jmynarz, +49.721.aahh, BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen

15:03:00 <HadleyBeeman> rrsagent, make records public

rrsagent, make records public

15:03:30 <HadleyBeeman> Should I clean up the minutes, or is there someone else who wants to do that?

Should I clean up the minutes, or is there someone else who wants to do that?

15:04:24 <HadleyBeeman> Thanks, PhilA2.  I don't think I can access that part of the wiki… not sure why :(

Thanks, PhilA2. I don't think I can access that part of the wiki… not sure why :(

15:06:09 <HadleyBeeman> rrsagent, please publish the minutes

rrsagent, please publish the minutes

15:06:09 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-minutes.html HadleyBeeman

RRSAgent IRC Bot: I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-minutes.html HadleyBeeman



Formatted by CommonScribe


This revision (#1) generated 2012-10-04 15:36:58 UTC by 'phila', comments: None