Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Chatlog 2012-10-04

From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

See original RRSAgent log or preview nicely formatted version.

Please justify/explain all edits to this page, in your "edit summary" text.

13:55:09 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #gld
13:55:09 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-irc
13:55:11 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
13:55:11 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #gld
13:55:13 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GLD
13:55:13 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
13:55:14 <trackbot> Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference
13:55:14 <trackbot> Date: 04 October 2012
13:55:44 <George> AGENDA: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20121004
13:56:14 <George> Chair: George
13:56:43 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has now started
13:56:49 <Zakim> + +1.518.276.aaaa
13:57:04 <olyerickson> Zakim, aaaa is me.
13:57:04 <Zakim> +olyerickson; got it
13:57:25 <Zakim> +??P4
13:57:29 <jmynarz> jmynarz has joined #gld
13:57:34 <Zakim> -??P4
13:57:48 <DaveReynolds> DaveReynolds has joined #gld
13:57:48 <Zakim> + +91.80.67.84.aabb
13:58:42 <james> hello all, i'm new to the WG. @Zakim, are you having the bot call participants, or authorizing certain numbers to call in?
13:59:05 <boris> boris has joined #gld
13:59:08 <Zakim> +George_Thomas
14:00:01 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aacc
14:00:04 <Zakim> +??P16
14:00:24 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:00:31 <danbri> danbri has joined #gld
14:00:36 <Zakim> + +34.91.336.aadd
14:00:43 <Zakim> +davidwood
14:00:52 <boris> zakim, aadd is me
14:00:53 <Zakim> +boris; got it
14:01:08 <Zakim> +Sandro
14:01:09 <PhilA2> PhilA2 has joined #gld
14:01:21 <bhyland> good day all
14:01:21 <George> Zakim, who is here?
14:01:24 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro
14:01:29 <Zakim> On IRC I see PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro
14:01:43 <martinAlvarez> martinAlvarez has joined #gld
14:01:48 <Biplav> Biplav has joined #gld
14:01:50 <BartvanLeeuwen> BartvanLeeuwen has joined #gld
14:02:13 <james_> james_ has joined #gld
14:02:36 <Zakim> +??P35
14:02:38 <George> Zakim, who is here?
14:02:43 <martinAlvarez> zakim, ??p35 is me
14:02:49 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, davidwood, Sandro, ??P35
14:02:58 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:03:05 <Zakim> +martinAlvarez; got it
14:03:08 <Zakim> +??P33
14:03:14 <sandro> zakim, who is talking?
14:03:14 <bhyland> zakim, who is talking?
14:03:14 <martinAlvarez> zakim, mute me
14:03:16 <Zakim> On IRC I see james_, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson, gatemezi, George, james, agis,
14:03:19 <bhyland> ouch!!
14:03:20 <BartvanLeeuwen> Zakim, ??P33 is me
14:03:21 <Zakim> ... MacTed, trackbot, sandro
14:03:28 <Zakim> +??P39
14:03:41 <Zakim> martinAlvarez should now be muted
14:03:43 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
14:03:49 <Zakim> +BartvanLeeuwen; got it
14:03:53 <Zakim> sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (15%), +33.4.93.00.aacc (77%), ??P39 (83%)
14:04:07 <Zakim> -??P39
14:04:08 <sandro> zakim, drop aacc
14:04:12 <Zakim> bhyland, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: olyerickson (37%), George_Thomas (19%), davidwood (15%), Sandro (49%)
14:04:20 <bhyland> zakim, davidwood is me
14:04:31 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aacc
14:04:34 <sandro> zakim, who is on the call?
14:04:43 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:04:45 <Zakim> sorry, sandro, I do not see a party named 'aacc'
14:04:57 <Zakim> +bhyland; got it
14:05:01 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, +91.80.67.84.aabb, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, [IPcaller]
14:05:25 <james> Zakim, ??P39 is me
14:05:25 <Zakim> I already had ??P39 as Mike, james
14:05:40 <gatemezi> Hi all.
14:05:48 <Biplav> zakim, +91.80.67.84.aabb is me
14:05:51 <Zakim> +Biplav; got it
14:06:11 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
14:06:24 <PhilA2> zakim, IPcaller.a is me
14:06:24 <Zakim> +PhilA2; got it
14:06:30 <HadleyBeeman> HadleyBeeman has joined #gld
14:06:47 <sandro> Zakim, IPcaller is james 
14:06:47 <Zakim> +james; got it
14:07:07 <sandro> queue=
14:07:10 <Zakim> + +1.440.389.aaee
14:07:18 <olyerickson> OpenNorth http://opennorth.ca/
14:07:27 <HadleyBeeman> zakim, aaee is me
14:07:28 <Zakim> +HadleyBeeman; got it
14:07:31 <sandro> not yet, PhilA2 
14:07:38 <George> Welcome James - Exec Dir of OpenNorth
14:07:38 <olyerickson> Topic: Noob Intros
14:07:50 <bhyland> Welcome James, thanks for joining.  
14:07:53 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aaff
14:08:09 <sandro> zakim, drop aaff
14:08:09 <Zakim> +33.4.93.00.aaff is being disconnected
14:08:10 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aaff
14:09:06 <olyerickson> Zakim, please armor me against scribe roulette
14:09:06 <Zakim> I don't understand 'please armor me against scribe roulette', olyerickson
14:09:16 <George> zakim, pick a victim
14:09:16 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose olyerickson
14:09:23 <olyerickson> PMSL
14:09:24 <HadleyBeeman> I'll do it
14:09:41 <sandro> scribe: HadleyBeeman 
14:10:01 <Zakim> + +33.4.93.00.aagg
14:10:02 <Biplav> I can volunteer as well for future.
14:10:06 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: welcome
14:10:17 <sandro> zakim, drop aagg
14:10:17 <Zakim> +33.4.93.00.aagg is being disconnected
14:10:18 <Zakim> - +33.4.93.00.aagg
14:10:23 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call
14:10:23 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland
14:10:39 <bhyland> zakim, you are too d*&^ picky!
14:10:39 <Zakim> I don't understand 'you are too d*&^ picky!', bhyland
14:10:45 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?
14:10:45 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, ??P16, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman
14:11:35 <PhilA2> agis ?
14:11:37 <sandro> gatemezi, is that you dialing in and ending us with us put on hold hearing french music?
14:11:41 <PhilA2> Are you there?
14:11:42 <bhyland> @Ghislain, we drop you because we're getting interrupted with lengthy intro and music from your lovely French operator.
14:11:54 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: accepting last week's minutes
14:11:59 <olyerickson> Abstains...
14:12:01 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1
14:12:07 <agis> hello all! agis as usual has problems with the SIP configuration:-)
14:12:10 <PhilA2> -> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-09-27 Last week's minutes
14:12:11 <bhyland> q+
14:12:47 <George> ack bhyland 
14:12:58 <BenediktKaempgen> BenediktKaempgen has joined #gld
14:13:07 <jmynarz> Zakim, ??P16 is me
14:13:07 <Zakim> +jmynarz; got it
14:13:13 <PhilA2> q+
14:13:32 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila2
14:13:47 <sandro> bhyland: As I recall, last week we decided not to do Geo, but I don't see that recorded in the minutes.
14:13:54 <Zakim> + +49.721.aahh
14:14:23 <sandro> PhilA2: I'd rather if we said "not now" instead of "we're never going to do it"
14:14:23 <George> q?
14:14:24 <HadleyBeeman> phila2: we decided not to NEVER do anything with location, but for the time being not to. Note the existence of the community group that is working on it.
14:14:32 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, who is here
14:14:32 <Zakim> BenediktKaempgen, you need to end that query with '?'
14:14:37 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, who is here?
14:14:37 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,
14:14:40 <Zakim> ... +49.721.aahh
14:14:40 <Zakim> On IRC I see BenediktKaempgen, HadleyBeeman, james, BartvanLeeuwen, Biplav, martinAlvarez, PhilA2, danbri, boris, DaveReynolds, jmynarz, Zakim, RRSAgent, bhyland, olyerickson,
14:14:42 <Zakim> ... gatemezi, George, agis, MacTed, trackbot, sandro
14:14:53 <PhilA2> s/with location/with people/
14:14:54 <BenediktKaempgen> zakim, aahh is BenediktKaempgen
14:14:54 <Zakim> +BenediktKaempgen; got it
14:15:08 <bhyland> Proposed: We acknowledge that Geography and Spatial Vocab is listed as optional on the charter.  There was some initial work on a wiki page but the volunteers have since ceased attending the GLD WG.
14:15:25 <sandro> bhyland: We acknowledge that Geo is listed as optional in the charter.  There was some initial work, on a wiki page, but the volunteers are not longer participating, and we acknowledge that we're not going to get to it within the charter timeframe.
14:15:32 <bhyland> +1
14:15:54 <bhyland> With that noted, I +1 last week's minutes
14:16:38 <gatemezi> @bhyland: You mean the initial volunteers? because there still volunteers for Geo Vocab in the group
14:16:43 <George> Topic: RADion
14:16:48 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA2:  There was a suggestion on the mailing list that proposed the working group not take on RADion as a work item.
14:16:48 <tinagheen> tinagheen has joined #gld
14:17:09 <HadleyBeeman> ... If it exists elsewhere, the group will note its existence.
14:17:17 <bhyland> +1
14:17:18 <Zakim> +[LC]
14:17:30 <tinagheen> Zakim, [LC] is me
14:17:30 <Zakim> +tinagheen; got it
14:17:42 <gatemezi> +1 to accept last week's minute
14:18:02 <PhilA2> -> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html new version
14:18:09 <sandro> gatemezi, are you suggesting that the group has the time/energy/staff for doing a geo vocab?      if so, that's worth talking over with the chairs.
14:18:18 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA2:  Spent some time on ADMS (Gofran is co-editor on that).  When the chair designates, we can take it to first public working draft
14:18:21 <PhilA2> s/new version/new version of ADMS/
14:18:40 <PhilA2> Co-editor of ADMS is Gofran
14:19:19 <PhilA2> Last week's meeting announced that Gofran Shukair of DERI, NUIG will be co-editor of ADMS, the latest editor's draft of which is at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html
14:19:24 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  There was one area of ORG added in response to Bart's suggestions several months ago.  Doc polished, ready to review.  Sent out last week.
14:20:19 <HadleyBeeman> …Cygri has done a detailed review, made editorial suggestions.  More work than expected for today.  Will sort that over the weekend for last-call vote early next week.
14:20:46 <HadleyBeeman> s/for last-call vote/for review in advance of last-call vote
14:20:52 <agis> agis has left #gld
14:21:10 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland:  why a possible restructure?
14:21:10 <agis> agis has joined #gld
14:21:10 <BartvanLeeuwen> q+
14:21:39 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: Possibly reorganise vocab references and materials to be at the end.
14:22:10 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland: Is there precedent here we can follow?
14:22:43 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  This is a preference, but not an unreasonable one.  That's a normal way to do it.  I like to see it intermixed myself.
14:23:16 <HadleyBeeman> Bhyland:  I think it's well-structured as it is.  I'd hate to see you have to do a lot of work at this point.
14:24:02 <PhilA2> I agree there is no "definitive style" for vocabularies. +1 to Dave retaining the structure that has worked for this well-used ontology to date
14:24:08 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Cygri has said this may not be a critical thing.  I'll spend a bit of time looking at it to get a sense of how much work it would be and still be coherent.
14:24:34 <gatemezi> +1 to bhyland point of not having too much work to reorganize ORG
14:24:42 <olyerickson> Sounds like cygri has made a suggestion on non-critical re-structuring that DaveReynolds is not opposed to...
14:25:20 <HadleyBeeman> George:  That sounds like a good approach.  Mhausenblas also volunteered to review it.  Health.data.gov may also be relevant, using ORG already.
14:25:26 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila2
14:25:31 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila
14:25:34 <bhyland> @DaveReynolds, I leave it to your judgement. For the record, I think it is well structured & readable as structured but if you're happy enough to make changes, thank you.
14:26:00 <HadleyBeeman> phila:  There is no rule book on how to set out a vocabulary, so I'm happy to see flexibility on this.  No need to conform with a standard that doesn't exist.
14:26:05 <HadleyBeeman> ack bartvanleeuwen
14:26:13 <gatemezi> s/Mhausenblas/mhausenblas
14:26:55 <HadleyBeeman> bartvanleeuwen: we had a 2-day meeting with the source of my changes. We were able to model everything we wanted to with the ORG ontology
14:27:15 <HadleyBeeman> George:  we should close action 78 as completed.  79 we'll leave for the additional work
14:27:48 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  re issue 35… should we close that as well?  Bartsvanleeuwen was the test-case for that, so if he's able to address that, then we're set.
14:28:13 <bhyland> @HadleyBeaman … do you know how to close issues?  I can do if you like
14:28:17 <HadleyBeeman> … The question of OPMV and ProvO:
14:29:13 <HadleyBeeman> … Use case:  Where two companies are merging, or a new company is created.  Change history.  We use the OPMV vocabulary for that.  
14:29:17 <bhyland> @Hadley, done. Recorded: closed: "Addressed and Bart has been successful in using ORG to satisfy his the noted cases.?
14:29:24 <bhyland> s/?/"
14:29:59 <sandro> q?
14:30:10 <HadleyBeeman> … Provenance working group has produced Prov-O.  Names are different, but the structure is the same.  Question for us:  can we switch vocabularies.  Issues:  timescales between the two working groups, and the existing uses in the wild.
14:30:34 <olyerickson> OPMV http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html
14:30:55 <HadleyBeeman> … Not aware of anyone dependent on the vocabulary as it is.  At some point, there may be a mapping between OPMV and PROV-O.
14:31:11 <HadleyBeeman> … If anyone can identify a problem here, now is a good time to bring it up
14:31:28 <sandro> zakim, who is talking?
14:31:38 <Zakim> sandro, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: George_Thomas (4%), DaveReynolds (80%)
14:31:47 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call
14:31:47 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the call', bhyland
14:31:54 <bhyland> zakim, who is on the call?
14:31:54 <Zakim> On the phone I see olyerickson, Biplav, George_Thomas, jmynarz, DaveReynolds, boris, bhyland, Sandro, martinAlvarez (muted), BartvanLeeuwen, james, PhilA2, HadleyBeeman,
14:31:58 <Zakim> ... BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen
14:32:00 <HadleyBeeman> … We need a formal reference to Prov-O in document, and then to update the ontology to reflect that.
14:32:13 <HadleyBeeman> s/we need/we would need
14:32:36 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  Is the term part of ORG, or a sub-class kind of thing?
14:32:58 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Sub-class.  Suggests other terms from that vocabulary that could be used.  
14:33:10 <George> q?
14:33:35 <HadleyBeeman> Sandro:  if it were just the vocabulary, I was wondering about sub-classing both of them.
14:34:08 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  That would be reasonable.  We still need to satisfy the Prov-O piece.  Still need to reference that in the formal document.  
14:34:38 <HadleyBeeman> Sandro:  Just want to make sure we aren't causing problems for anyone already using OPMV
14:35:04 <HadleyBeeman> … ORG uses everything in its own namespace.  Why is this a sub-class rather than just using the other term?
14:35:15 <PhilA2> q+ To raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)
14:35:16 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  because it's actually a specialisation. 
14:36:51 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  We could put this part "at risk".  Prov-O is moving along pretty well now. 
14:37:02 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  How to designate this?  Editorial notes: a change in the vocabulary intended to be backward compatible?
14:37:17 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  A usage note or something like that.  A list of changes in the appendix?
14:37:32 <HadleyBeeman> Davereynolds:  for last-call document, are we allowed editorial notes?
14:37:37 <gatemezi> Could some one putting the link to the actual rdf file of the Prov-O ontology?
14:37:42 <HadleyBeeman> sandro:  I'm thinking of a style of note that would even proceed into recomendation
14:37:52 <PhilA2> (For background, if you flag a feature as being 'At Risk' it means that you can take it out after LC (although IIRC not at CR)
14:38:19 <HadleyBeeman> ack phila
14:38:19 <Zakim> PhilA, you wanted to raise a separate issue (i.e. when the Prov discussion is done)
14:38:56 <olyerickson> For the record: The specific section we were discussing was 10.1 Class: ChangeEvent http://bit.ly/QJy1AS
14:39:16 <HadleyBeeman> pHilA: concept of an identifier:  handled differently in ORG than in OPMV.
14:40:39 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA: There are distinct bits of data about the identifier in ADMS — different to ORG.  Don't want to mess around with ORG, but we need to recognise that we have 2 other work items that refer to this identifier concept and we need to make sure they don't clash
14:40:52 <bhyland> @Hadley, should I also close ISSUE-36 re: RADion as I see status is set to "Raised" but I think should go to "Closed" based on earlier discussion … did I understand that correctly??
14:41:07 <bhyland> @Hadley, see http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/36
14:42:11 <PhilA2> -> The ADMS notion of a 'code' which includes the concept of an 'Identifier'
14:42:14 <PhilA2> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/adms/index.html#data-types
14:42:14 <olyerickson> Curious what the proposed PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" is http://open-biomed.sourceforge.net/opmv/ns.html#Process 
14:42:24 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: Option 1: Change ORG to make identifier a resource value as well as a typed value.  Option 2:  create another one in ORG.  Option 3:  Leave this in place.  In doing legal entity, you'll define an interment rule.
14:43:40 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds: that needs to be resolved before we vote on last call
14:44:08 <Zakim> -james
14:44:38 <olyerickson> See http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/static.html#property--identifier
14:45:07 <Zakim> +??P17
14:45:25 <james> james has joined #gld
14:45:46 <olyerickson> Q - Could we have a side-by-side comparison? 
14:45:55 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds and PhilA are working out where conflicting recommendations to use SKOS notation in ADMS and ORG come up (with regard to identifiers)
14:46:19 <George> q?
14:46:58 <olyerickson> Proposal: Can we have a side-by-side comparison??
14:47:10 <HadleyBeeman> ACTION:  PHilA and DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line
14:47:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-80 - And DaveReynolds to sort out this issue off-line [on Phil Archer - due 2012-10-11].
14:48:21 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:48:27 <HadleyBeeman> Topic: RADion
14:48:34 <james> zakim, ??P17 is me
14:48:34 <Zakim> +james; got it
14:49:10 <PhilA2> -> Richard's proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Sep/0064.html
14:50:02 <BenediktKaempgen> @olyerickson PROV-O equivalent of "opmv:Process" probably is prov:Activity
14:50:16 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  To clarify, RADion is mostly an abstract way to think of things like software forges and data catalogues.  Anywhere you have lots of assets collected in a category or repository.
14:50:34 <HadleyBeeman> …You'd subclass it, as DCAT does.  You'd rarely use it directly.
14:51:22 <HadleyBeeman> … Cygri is saying fine, it's there.  We don't have to think about it, except in seeing sublcasses (like DCAT and ADMS).  We could decide to accept that and not discuss RADion again
14:51:38 <BartvanLeeuwen> +1
14:51:41 <bhyland> +1
14:51:41 <HadleyBeeman> bhyland:  Agreed, we are closing Issue 36?
14:51:45 <DaveReynolds> +0
14:52:51 <gatemezi> +1
14:52:54 <Zakim> +??P37
14:53:09 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:53:13 <HadleyBeeman> DaveReynolds:  Not opposing to close it, but the implication of this discussion is that we accept the conclusion that DCAT is a subclass… I wouldn't vote for it, but I"m not against it.  I abstain
14:53:20 <George> q?
14:53:32 <james> q-
14:53:38 <HadleyBeeman> ack ??P17
14:54:14 <PhilA2> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The WG resolves that RADion is *not* a GLD-WG product. If the RADion editor makes a credible assertion that he is going to publish the RADion namespace document regardless through some other venue (SWIG, community group, Just Ask the Webmaster, ?), then GLD-WG will include mappings to RADion in the DCAT and ADMS RDFS files. and close Issue-36
14:54:25 <bhyland> Resolved to CLOSE ISSUE-36.  RADion will not be further pursued.
14:54:28 <Zakim> -??P37
14:54:32 <bhyland> +1
14:54:41 <sandro> RESOLVED: CLOSE ISSUE-36.  RADion will not be further pursued.
14:55:12 <gatemezi> +1
14:55:31 <HadleyBeeman> Topic:  The larger ISA programme
14:56:14 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Lots here, little time.  There was an agreement between Jeff Jaffe and the European Commission (with George, Bernadette, Sandro, Thomas and Phil) to take on some of these items that are coming from the EC work.
14:56:23 <gatemezi> zakim, who is speaking?
14:56:34 <Zakim> gatemezi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: PhilA2 (30%)
14:57:01 <gatemezi> s/PhilA/PhilA2
14:57:13 <bhyland> s/to take on some of these items/to review the ISA Programme Vocabs for possible RECOMMENDATION track status.
14:57:19 <HadleyBeeman> PHilA:  I'm trying to take the group along in our discussions (including the one we just had about RADion).  The ADMS spec is something we can take to first public working draft — but we need the group to buy in first.
14:57:40 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  The EC has emailed us to express displeasure with our lack of expediency.
14:58:12 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Some things are easy to handle.  We haven't published the Location Core Vocabulary because there is a community group to deal with that.  Chair should be set today.  
14:58:23 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA:  Some things just aren't a priority.  Not in use.
14:58:43 <HadleyBeeman> … The legal entity one is active and implemented.  There is demand.
14:58:56 <bhyland> q+
14:59:06 <HadleyBeeman> … We haven't yet, in this group, brought this work into W3C space yet because we've been doing other things.  It's time.
14:59:42 <HadleyBeeman> bhyland: Are there any people who could augment this activity either direct with ISA or complementary, because we're short on time on this?  Are there 1-2 other reviewers outside the working group we could get to help?
15:00:13 <olyerickson> HadleyBeeman: Note that I updated ACTION-80 to better reflect what is being asked...
15:00:22 <HadleyBeeman> PhilA2:  I would say that everything that was produced and handed over was done by a working group, just not THIS working group.
15:00:48 <HadleyBeeman> … The Commission is not putting pressure on individuals, but it is on the W3C.
15:01:18 <HadleyBeeman> George:  Phil, Sandro, Bernadette and I will discuss this more next week.  We'll see what we can do to progress this.
15:01:32 <bhyland> At the end of the day, we did agree to *review it* and we agreed 9 months ago.  I feel we owe a thorough review & indication as to whether this is "on our plate" or decidedly "off our plate" (which would be very unfortunate).
15:01:46 <olyerickson> Zakim, choose a chairperson...
15:01:46 <Zakim> I don't understand 'choose a chairperson', olyerickson
15:01:57 <BenediktKaempgen> bye
15:01:58 <Zakim> -martinAlvarez
15:01:59 <Biplav> Thanks
15:02:02 <Zakim> -Sandro
15:02:06 <Zakim> -HadleyBeeman
15:02:08 <Zakim> -olyerickson
15:02:08 <bhyland> @PhilA, do you have a minute for a call?
15:02:10 <Zakim> -PhilA2
15:02:10 <olyerickson> olyerickson has left #gld
15:02:14 <Zakim> -bhyland
15:02:18 <Zakim> -james
15:02:24 <Zakim> -tinagheen
15:02:25 <Zakim> -BenediktKaempgen
15:02:27 <Zakim> -BartvanLeeuwen
15:02:27 <gatemezi> Chair: George
15:02:31 <Zakim> -DaveReynolds
15:02:33 <bhyland> @phil, skype?
15:02:35 <Zakim> -boris
15:02:36 <jmynarz> jmynarz has left #gld
15:02:42 <Zakim> -George_Thomas
15:02:49 <Zakim> -jmynarz
15:02:51 <Zakim> -Biplav
15:02:53 <Zakim> T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended
15:02:54 <gatemezi> Thanks, all! 
15:02:55 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.518.276.aaaa, olyerickson, George_Thomas, +33.4.93.00.aacc, DaveReynolds, +34.91.336.aadd, boris, Sandro, martinAlvarez, BartvanLeeuwen, bhyland, Biplav, PhilA2,
15:02:58 <Zakim> ... james, +1.440.389.aaee, HadleyBeeman, +33.4.93.00.aaff, +33.4.93.00.aagg, jmynarz, +49.721.aahh, BenediktKaempgen, tinagheen
15:03:00 <HadleyBeeman> rrsagent, make records public
15:03:05 <DaveReynolds> DaveReynolds has left #gld
15:03:12 <james> james has left #gld
15:03:14 <agis> agis has left #gld
15:03:20 <martinAlvarez> martinAlvarez has left #gld
15:03:30 <HadleyBeeman> Should I clean up the minutes, or is there someone else who wants to do that?
15:04:24 <HadleyBeeman> Thanks, PhilA2.  I don't think I can access that part of the wiki… not sure why :(
15:06:09 <HadleyBeeman> rrsagent, please publish the minutes
15:06:09 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-gld-minutes.html HadleyBeeman
# SPECIAL MARKER FOR CHATSYNC.  DO NOT EDIT THIS LINE OR BELOW.  SRCLINESUSED=00000327