Email discussions on HTML media errors and HTML content protection errors

- HTML media errors discussion

- HTML content protection errors discussion

clarke: what level do we want?
... Ted provided numbers of errors
... specific to content protection
... Mark Watson proposed lower level ones

markW: architectural question
... we need some archtecture

mav: agree errors for content protection is not well-defined as the ones for HTTP

ted: wasn't aware of multiple proposals

clarke: on the low level errors

(discussion on error codes and architecture)

markW: 600 different errors in our system

ted: can you show actual use case?

markW: can

clarke: it would be useful to list errors match to actual APIs

ted: yes
... like that idea

clarke: even though they would occur asynchronously
... if you can provide that, it would be useful
... I'll try to put together on the Wiki

ted: how do you proceed using both ML and Wiki?

clarke: maybe one page on adaptive bit rate and another on content protection
... including list of errors
... and add comments
... open discussion using Wiki
... will take an action item to create them

<scribe> ACTION: clarke to create wiki pages for adaptive streaming and content protection [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/11/17-webtv-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-82 - Create wiki pages for adaptive streaming and content protection [on Clarke Stevens - due 2011-11-24].

schedule expectation

clarke: hope we can conclude this discussion by the end of the year
... there is no specific deadline, though
... sounds reasonable?

kaz: do you mean we'll wrap up the discussion so far and create the first version of the MPTF report?

clarke: yes
... put together the requirements, and pass them to the HTML WG

kaz: great
... btw, I think we should (1) send out a brief summary from our joint meetings at TPAC 2011 to the IG public list and (2) update the whole IG report with the summary report, (because we had great discussion and progress there) though we didn't have our own F2F meeting
... maybe we'll publish the report asap because it's already 2 weeks since the meetings

clarke: already provided some report with several paragraphs

kaz: that should be enough. I'll send a message to the IG chairs and ask them for opinions

clarke: let's see their opinions

[ adjourned ]