<trackbot> Date: 11 January 2011

<W3C> whoami

<Bob_> scribenick: asoldano

<Bob_> agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0033.html

<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11696

dug, can 11696 be added to agenda?

Bob_, ok, added to the agenda

Bob_, agenda approved

Bob_, minutes http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/12/2011-01-04.html approved

next f2f meeting

Bob_, details for logistic are posted online

<dug> impls: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/testing/implementations.html

Bob_, eventing optionality analysis:

Bob_, xs:dateTime is at risk for wse:expires

Bob_, wse:filter at risk too

scribe: discussions going on on wse:Reasons, which might be at risk, but it's not that a feature, is an informational element for humans ...

<W3C> +1 to Tom

Bob_, wse:Reason is not at risk

dug, why not removing that from the list of feature that can be at risk?

Bob_, dateTime on risk in both renew and expires

<li> +q

Bob_, Enumeration document has just one implementation

dug, I can check optional stuff in the spec is up2date

<li> thanks dug

dug, IBM might be able to implement enumeration

Bob_, there's no requirement for the specs to proceed at the same time

Bob_, and implementation can come from non w3c members too

Ram, from Microsoft side, nothing would be at risk for enumeration

Bob_, transfer:

dug, propose removing "Support for empty resources" from doc

Bob_, OK

Bob_, fragment:

Bob_, metadata exchange:

Bob_, once we go to CR, we'll also notify what's at risk

TOPIC 11696

<dug> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11696

<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0020.html

dug, this to be solved by having enumeration match evening

Bob_, resolved as proposed

Bob_, working group agrees on incorporation of resolved issues

Bob_, any objection to progress all specs to CR?

Bob_, no objection

RESOLUTION: all specs can progress to CR

dug, what about adding variations/sub-scenarios to the test scenarios?

<Katy> I need to drop off the call early, bye

Bob_, propose to just focus on tests now

Bob_, that's all for today

Bob_, next meeting at demand basis

Bob_, next meeting 25th

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/woirking/working/
Found ScribeNick: asoldano
Inferring Scribes: asoldano

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Ashok_Malhotra Bob_ Bob_Freund Doug_Davis Gilbert_Pilz IPcaller Katy Microsoft Oracle Ram Tom_Rutt W3C Yves aaaa aabb asoldano dug impls joined li scribenick trackbot ws-ra
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0033.html

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Found Date: 11 Jan 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/01/11-ws-ra-minutes.html
People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.