action-29?
<trackbot> ACTION-29 -- Philippe Le Hégaret to follow up on the idea of a free-software-compatible license for a note on HTML authoring -- due 2010-10-09 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/29
<pimpbot> Title: ACTION-29 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/agenda
<pimpbot> Title: Input for Agenda Planning for the HTML Weekly - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: plh is not here... the W3C mgmt is still looking into this, and contemplating a change in direction
ACTION-29 due in one month
<trackbot> ACTION-29 Follow up on the idea of a free-software-compatible license for a note on HTML authoring due date now in one month
action-187?
<trackbot> ACTION-187 -- Maciej Stachowiak to inform the group that no comments on issue-9 requirements means they will be accepted -- due 2010-09-30 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/187
<pimpbot> Title: ACTION-187 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: I've not completed that action yet
ACTION-187 due in 1 week
<trackbot> ACTION-187 Inform the group that no comments on issue-9 requirements means they will be accepted due date now in 1 week
ACTION-188?
<trackbot> ACTION-188 -- Sam Ruby to assign a member of the HTML WG to follow up on link-relations registry requests -- due 2010-10-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/188
<pimpbot> Title: ACTION-188 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
http://www.w3.org/mid/20101006145830.GD81427%2540sideshowbarker
<pimpbot> Title: volunteer needed to raise new HTML5 spec bug proposing general link-relations spec change [was: ACTION-188 (was: ACTION-185 (register link relations))] from Michael(tm) Smith on 2010-10-06 (public-html@w3.org from October 2010) (at www.w3.org)
<Zakim> MikeSmith, you wanted to comment
mike: i've unvolunteered as in
the past when I have entered bugs for others and then when
questions come up a few weeks later I don't remember what the
original concern was
... mnot's feedback makes sense and should be addressed
... I would hope that we can find somebody to step forward
mjs: I note that the people most interested in getting IANA registry are those that are designated experts; that does not prevent them from filing bugs against the HTML5 spec
mjs: issues-125, 126, and 127 were mentioned last week
http://www.w3.org/2010/09/30-html-wg-minutes.html#item02
<pimpbot> Title: HTML Weekly Teleconference -- 30 Sep 2010 (at www.w3.org)
issue-125?
<trackbot> ISSUE-125 -- Requirement to break RFC 2616 compliance with respect to single quotes not needed for legacy content -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/125
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-125 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
issue-126?
<trackbot> ISSUE-126 -- Requirement to break RFC 2616 compliance with respect to backslashes not needed for legacy content -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/126
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-126 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
issue-127?
<trackbot> ISSUE-127 -- Simplify characterization of link types -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/127
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-127 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
issue-128?
<trackbot> ISSUE-128 -- Authors should be able to use <figure> where <img> can be used -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/128
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-128 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: Issue 128 is being discussed on the mailing list
mjs: skipping over
issue-41?
<trackbot> ISSUE-41 -- Decentralized extensibility -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-41 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: survey closes today
issue-92?
<trackbot> ISSUE-92 -- Re-write the Table section to remove extraneous material, and provide cleaner description -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/92
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-92 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: survey closed
yesterday
... issue-103 was inadvertently added to the agenda
... issue 74 and 105 will be covered in discussion topics
issue-89?
<trackbot> ISSUE-89 -- Remove Section 4.12 Common Idioms without dedicated Elements -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/89
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-89 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-89-objection-poll/
mjs: two new calls for proposals
issue-125?
<trackbot> ISSUE-125 -- Requirement to break RFC 2616 compliance with respect to single quotes not needed for legacy content -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/125
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-125 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
issue-128?
<trackbot> ISSUE-128 -- Authors should be able to use <figure> where <img> can be used -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/128
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-128 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
mjs: actual issue was issue-124
issue-124?
<trackbot> ISSUE-124 -- nofollow/noreferrer not allowed on <link> -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/124
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-124 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0058.html
<pimpbot> Title: Heartbeat draft update, and request to editors from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-10-06 (public-html@w3.org from October 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mjs: we have asked to make bugzilla the primary means to enter comments
janina: will the media spec request be in the heartbeat?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0301.html
<pimpbot> Title: Requesting Spec Text Additions from Janina Sajka on 2010-09-27 (public-html@w3.org from September 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mjs: they are not in yet, but there still is an opportunity. If they don't make it, they will land shortly after.
issue-85?
<trackbot> ISSUE-85 -- ARIA roles added to the a element should be conforming in HTML5 -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/85
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-85 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10066
<pimpbot> 1110066: faulkner.steve, P1, NEW, 13replace section 3.2.6 with the alternative spec text provided (ARIA)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0225.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-74 canvas-accessibility and ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-09-21 (public-html@w3.org from September 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
scribe notes that the above link is incorrect...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Oct/0054.html
<pimpbot> Title: Re: ARIA mapping status from Steven Faulkner on 2010-10-05 (public-html@w3.org from October 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
<pimpbot> Title: HTML Weekly Teleconference -- 07 Oct 2010 (at www.w3.org)
mjs: likely just one issue will be raised to cover a number of differences
cynthia: I think that there are a number of other bugs pending
mjs: at the moment, I see 4 bugs, 3 new, 1 reopened
cynthia: very much a work in progress
issue-9?
<trackbot> ISSUE-9 -- how accessibility works for <video> is unclear -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-9 - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
user: requirements http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0365.html
<pimpbot> Title: {Announcement} Media accessibility user requirements overview, Thu Sep 2 from Paul Cotton on 2010-08-31 (public-html@w3.org from August 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mjs: at this point, we are ready to go with this, so if you have any comments now would be a good time to speak up
janina: this document has been
reviewed with a number of groups, and expect comments and
changes within a week
... I will post to both the public-html list and the a11y
list
mjs: if you have particular people in mind that you want to seek comments from, please approach them directly
janina: mozilla popcorn libraries are good examples of ancillary content
Requested Spec Additions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0301.html
<pimpbot> Title: Requesting Spec Text Additions from Janina Sajka on 2010-09-27 (public-html@w3.org from September 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mjs: this concerns two sections
which previously were removed upon request, and continued to
evolve at the WHATWG.
... there is now general agreement to bring them back as
starting points for discussion
... there is also one new section, which is currently expressed
in a way that is dependent on WEBSRT, generalizing this is
pending
janina: the request is to bring these sections back into the W3C doc in a tech agnostic manner, and to compare that against the requirements
<pimpbot> planet: Web DOM Core <11http://annevankesteren.nl/2010/10/domcore>
janina: the expectation is that there will be gaps, and the plan is to first identify the gaps and then identify means to fill those gaps
mjs: ISSUE-74, ISSUE-105: any comments on survey plan?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0225.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-74 canvas-accessibility and ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-09-21 (public-html@w3.org from September 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
mjs: a number of change proposals
have been entered, some of which relate to others BEING adopted
or NOT being adopted.
... we need to find a way to produce a survey which is not
confusing
... we have heard feed back of people who are unhappy with this
approach
... we need feedback on the mailing list
... if we don't hear specific feedback soon, we likely will
proceed with what has been described...
janina: we reached clarify in the task force on the view on the questions
<janina> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0225.html
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-74 canvas-accessibility and ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap from Maciej Stachowiak on 2010-09-21 (public-html@w3.org from September 2010) (at lists.w3.org)
janina: the first question has
gone back to the drawing board, it doesn't appear to be
ready
... no problems with 2, 3, or 5
... question 4 would be better clarified or stated as a
counter-proposal
mjs: what I am hearing is that the TF is ready to proceed on boolean nonav and usemap, but would like to have more time to work on focus, caret, and <missed this>.
cynthia: I also think we are ready on shadow-dom
janina: I will take this to the mailing list
mjs: any other topics?
mjs: adrian volunteers... thanks adrian!
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: rubys Inferring Scribes: rubys Present: Radhika_Roy Norm Sam Julian adrianba Mike Michael_Cooper Maciej Cynthia_Shelly Janina_Sajka Regrets: Gregory_Rosmaita Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2010OctDec/0000.html Found Date: 07 Oct 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/10/07-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]