See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 22 June 2010
<ChrisL> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/
<Tav> I actually am on vacation this week so I won't be calling in.
<ChrisL> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/disco
<scribe> Scribe: anthony
CL: Whatever we use it should be easy to use
AG: I thought we used Tracker for Tiny 1.2
CL: Can pull information from Tracker using DisCo
<ChrisL> example http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/112
CL: I guess that is ok. As long
as people put the issue number in the email
... we should get a complete list of all the comments
AG: I think Doug said that in an email when we went to LC for Tiny 1.2
ED: Ok, I guess what we'll know
what we're doing in July
... we have to address all of the last call comments before
taking the next step
... what's the likely hood of that taking place before SVG
Open
CL: Should be ok. We can't add
new features and if the comments are too complicated
... we probably can consider them for SVG 2.0
ED: Sounds like we have the issue
tracking thing solved - using Tracker
... we should make a product for 1.1 Full 2nd last call
CL: Ok I'll do that now
<ChrisL> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/24
<ChrisL> test suite for 1.1 F2 http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/3
ED: Would be good to have that
for PR. Want to have a bit more than what we have for SVG
Open
... depending on everyone schedule
CL: The useful thing is we have
it published
... so there's something to show people
ED: That was the reason I put in
the announcement we are looking for feedback on the test
suite
... I added those PNG tests
... and ran them through Batik
... they didn't produce anything that looked correct
... I wasn't sure
... I checked in the reference images
<ChrisL> ACTION-2799
<ChrisL> ACTION-2799?
<trackbot> ACTION-2799 -- Erik Dahlström to review the png tests and generate reference images -- due 2010-06-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2799
ED: I don't know what to do
CL: I tried them in Opera and FF they were fine there
ED: Could be the way Batik handles the PNGs
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObject/struct-image-13-f.html
CL: I see what the bug is
<ChrisL> all the 16 bit per component images are wrong in batik
CL: Probably got the high and low bytes wrong. I'll raise a bug on it
ED: I didn't want to mark it as
properly reviewed yet
... and you said you'll change some of the passCriteria
wording
... what I did do is update the harness
AG: I had an action to convert
the harness to XHTML
... there are still tests to be done?
CL: Yes
ED: Waiting for Patrick to get back to me on some of them
<scribe> ACTION: Erik to Add XHTML validation to the SVG 1.1 Full 2nd Edition test harness [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2803 - Add XHTML validation to the SVG 1.1 Full 2nd Edition test harness [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29].
ED: I'll be around until the end
of the July
... around the 20th I go on holidays
... then I'll be back 3 weeks later
... do we expect to have telcons for that period
CL: Depends. Currently we have low attendance
ED: I guess we'll do part
tracking comments and part test suite work
... we have F2F meeting set up for directly after SVG
Open
... has anyone spoken to the organising committee?
CL: I can speak to him when I get back from travel
ED: We can try to have a telcon a
week
... then hold off for a block of weeks
CL: We can have telcons for the
first 3 weeks of July
... so we cancel from Tue 27th July to SVG Open
ED: I might still be around on IRC or email
<scribe> ACTION: Erik to Send out telcon reminder for everyone [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2804 - Send out telcon reminder for everyone [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29].
CL: I think we can move back to
one telcon a week
... probably the Tuesday time
ED: Tuesday is a good time for me
AG: I'll be there for that
CL: Fantasi proposed wording for
2.1 and SVG
... it is good for both, but a bit short for SVG
... and she's proposed wording for 2.1
... but we can't use 2.1 because but we reference 2.0
ED: We should probably reiterate the specificity
CL: Can you email back and say you like the wording
ED: Can we accept her wording as
a comment?
... can we take her wording?
CL: The essential part has not
changed
... we test it in a selectors test
ED: Even if we reference 2.0 it doesn't change anything?
CL: There a few places were we
have a direct link to a spec
... I think we can work out some wording for it
<scribe> ACTION: Erik to Respond and put Fantasi's comment into Tracker [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2805 - Respond and put Fantasi's comment into Tracker [on Erik Dahlström - due 2010-06-29].
ED: No other agenda requests
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/holidays/travel/ Found Scribe: anthony Inferring ScribeNick: anthony Default Present: [IPcaller], ed, ChrisL, anthony Present: [IPcaller] ed ChrisL anthony Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2010AprJun/0141.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 22 Jun 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/22-svg-minutes.html People with action items: erik[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]