13:50:13 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/05-rdfa-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/05-rdfa-irc ←
13:50:15 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:50:17 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7332
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 7332 ←
13:50:17 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes ←
13:50:18 <trackbot> Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference
13:50:18 <trackbot> Date: 05 August 2010
13:50:25 <manu> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Aug/0006.html
13:50:29 <manu> Chair: Manu
13:50:55 <manu> Present: Knud, Manu, Shane, MarkB, Toby
13:53:02 <manu> Regrets: Ivan
13:58:18 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started
(No events recorded for 8 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started ←
13:58:25 <Zakim> +Knud
Zakim IRC Bot: +Knud ←
13:58:55 <Zakim> +manu
Zakim IRC Bot: +manu ←
13:59:01 <Zakim> + +44.785.583.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +44.785.583.aaaa ←
13:59:09 <Knud> Scribe: Knud
(Scribe set to Knud Möller)
13:59:12 <toby> zakim, aaaa is me
Toby Inkster: zakim, aaaa is me ←
13:59:12 <Zakim> +toby; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +toby; got it ←
13:59:24 <toby> zakim,mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim,mute me ←
13:59:24 <Zakim> toby should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: toby should now be muted ←
14:01:43 <manu> zakim, who is on the call?
Manu Sporny: zakim, who is on the call? ←
14:01:43 <Zakim> On the phone I see Knud, manu, toby (muted)
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Knud, manu, toby (muted) ←
14:01:53 <markbirbeck> zakim, code?
Mark Birbeck: zakim, code? ←
14:01:53 <Zakim> the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), markbirbeck
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 7332 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), markbirbeck ←
14:02:46 <toby> zakim, unmute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmute me ←
14:02:46 <Zakim> toby should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: toby should no longer be muted ←
14:03:43 <Zakim> +??P10
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P10 ←
14:03:46 <markbirbeck> zakim, i am ?
Mark Birbeck: zakim, i am ? ←
14:03:46 <Zakim> +markbirbeck; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +markbirbeck; got it ←
14:04:15 <Zakim> +ShaneM
Zakim IRC Bot: +ShaneM ←
14:05:03 <toby> zakim, who's here?
Toby Inkster: zakim, who's here? ←
14:05:03 <Zakim> On the phone I see Knud, manu, toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see Knud, manu, toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM ←
14:05:05 <Zakim> On IRC I see toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM, Zakim, RRSAgent, trackbot, manu, Knud
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM, Zakim, RRSAgent, trackbot, manu, Knud ←
14:05:15 <Zakim> + +8014aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +8014aabb ←
14:05:21 <manu> zakim, I am ??bb
Manu Sporny: zakim, I am ??bb ←
14:05:21 <Zakim> sorry, manu, I do not see a party named '??bb'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, manu, I do not see a party named '??bb' ←
14:05:24 <manu> zakim, I am bb
Manu Sporny: zakim, I am bb ←
14:05:24 <Zakim> sorry, manu, I do not see a party named 'bb'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, manu, I do not see a party named 'bb' ←
14:05:32 <manu> zakim, aabb is me
Manu Sporny: zakim, aabb is me ←
14:05:32 <Zakim> +manu; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +manu; got it ←
14:06:01 <toby> zakim, mute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, mute me ←
14:06:01 <Zakim> toby should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: toby should now be muted ←
14:06:09 <manu> zakim, who is making noise?
Manu Sporny: zakim, who is making noise? ←
14:06:14 <toby> zakim, unmute me
Toby Inkster: zakim, unmute me ←
14:06:14 <Zakim> toby should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: toby should no longer be muted ←
14:06:19 <markbirbeck> zakim, mute me
Mark Birbeck: zakim, mute me ←
14:06:19 <Zakim> markbirbeck should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: markbirbeck should now be muted ←
14:06:20 <Zakim> manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu.a (100%), Knud (57%)
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: manu.a (100%), Knud (57%) ←
14:06:28 <Knud> Manu: Any additions or changes to the agenda?
Manu Sporny: Any additions or changes to the agenda? ←
14:06:28 <Zakim> Knud should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Knud should now be muted ←
14:07:11 <Knud> no other additions to the agenda
no other additions to the agenda ←
14:07:13 <markbirbeck> zakim, unmute me
Mark Birbeck: zakim, unmute me ←
14:07:13 <Zakim> markbirbeck should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: markbirbeck should no longer be muted ←
14:07:24 <Knud> TOPIC: ISSUE-31: setMapping API location
14:07:47 <Knud> Manu: setMapping call should either be duplicated or be moved from context to document interface
Manu Sporny: setMapping call should either be duplicated or be moved from context to document interface ←
14:08:00 <manu> document.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1");
Manu Sporny: document.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1"); ←
14:08:07 <manu> document.data.context.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1");
Manu Sporny: document.data.context.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1"); ←
14:08:51 <Knud> manu: document.setMapping could be an alias to context.setMapping
Manu Sporny: document.setMapping could be an alias to context.setMapping ←
14:09:28 <markbirbeck> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0054.html
Mark Birbeck: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0054.html ←
14:10:09 <Knud> mark: still open as to how to implement this
Mark Birbeck: still open as to how to implement this ←
14:10:24 <markbirbeck> document.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/");
Mark Birbeck: document.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"); ←
14:10:24 <markbirbeck> var people = document.getItemsByType("foaf:Person");
Mark Birbeck: var people = document.getItemsByType("foaf:Person"); ←
14:10:24 <Knud> ... as long as programmers can get to setMapping via document
... as long as programmers can get to setMapping via document ←
14:11:43 <Knud> manu: would like to keep the idea of context
Manu Sporny: would like to keep the idea of context ←
14:12:07 <Knud> ... also, some people might be concerned that we pollute the document interface too much
... also, some people might be concerned that we pollute the document interface too much ←
14:12:20 <markbirbeck> q+
Mark Birbeck: q+ ←
14:12:35 <manu> ack markbirbeck
Manu Sporny: ack markbirbeck ←
14:12:47 <toby> Is {document.setMapping("foaf","http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/");var people=document.getElementsByType("foaf:Person");} any easier than {var FOAF="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";var people=document.getElementsByType(FOAF+"Person");} ??
Toby Inkster: Is {document.setMapping("foaf","http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/");var people=document.getElementsByType("foaf:Person");} any easier than {var FOAF="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";var people=document.getElementsByType(FOAF+"Person");} ?? ←
14:12:51 <Zakim> -manu.a
Zakim IRC Bot: -manu.a ←
14:13:12 <Zakim> +manu.a
Zakim IRC Bot: +manu.a ←
14:13:16 <manu> ack markbirbeck
Manu Sporny: ack markbirbeck ←
14:13:49 <markbirbeck> q+
Mark Birbeck: q+ ←
14:14:03 <manu> ack markbirbeck
Manu Sporny: ack markbirbeck ←
14:14:58 <Knud> mark: now remembers that we steered clear of putting too much into document interface
Mark Birbeck: now remembers that we steered clear of putting too much into document interface ←
14:15:19 <manu> var context = document.data.context;
Manu Sporny: var context = document.data.context; ←
14:15:34 <manu> context.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1")?
Manu Sporny: context.setMapping("foaf", "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1")? ←
14:15:37 <Knud> ... so maybe we should rethink how we give people access to something like setMapping
... so maybe we should rethink how we give people access to something like setMapping ←
14:15:40 <manu> so, people would just do that.
Manu Sporny: so, people would just do that. ←
14:16:44 <Knud> ... there could also be a context parameter to getElementsByType
... there could also be a context parameter to getElementsByType ←
14:17:28 <Knud> ... would therefore like to withdraw the suggestion to move setMapping to document
... would therefore like to withdraw the suggestion to move setMapping to document ←
14:18:03 <ShaneM> no objection from me
Shane McCarron: no objection from me ←
14:18:08 <Knud> fine
fine ←
14:18:22 <manu> PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-31 and have Mark re-submit an alternative mechanism to make mappings easier to use.
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-31 and have Mark re-submit an alternative mechanism to make mappings easier to use. ←
14:18:33 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:18:34 <Knud> Knud: +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:18:35 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:18:37 <ShaneM> +1
Shane McCarron: +1 ←
14:18:43 <toby> +1
Toby Inkster: +1 ←
14:18:47 <manu> RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-31 and have Mark re-submit an alternative mechanism to make mappings easier to use.
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-31 and have Mark re-submit an alternative mechanism to make mappings easier to use. ←
14:19:02 <Knud> TOPIC: ISSUE-30: hasFeature clarifications
14:19:19 <manu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0053.html
Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0053.html ←
14:19:40 <Knud> Mark: hasFeature already exists in the DOM in other specs
Mark Birbeck: hasFeature already exists in the DOM in other specs ←
14:20:00 <manu> q+ to discuss RDFa version number
Manu Sporny: q+ to discuss RDFa version number ←
14:20:00 <Knud> ... our use of it should be aligned, e.g., with respect to the version number
... our use of it should be aligned, e.g., with respect to the version number ←
14:20:03 <manu> ack manu
Manu Sporny: ack manu ←
14:20:03 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to discuss RDFa version number
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, you wanted to discuss RDFa version number ←
14:20:37 <Knud> manu: mostly agrees with proposal, except: we now want to make RDFa versionless
Manu Sporny: mostly agrees with proposal, except: we now want to make RDFa versionless ←
14:20:56 <Knud> ... so, just check if RDFa support is available, not a specific version
... so, just check if RDFa support is available, not a specific version ←
14:21:31 <Knud> mark: maybe we should change feature string to "rdfa_api"
Mark Birbeck: maybe we should change feature string to "rdfa_api" ←
14:22:13 <manu> document.hasFeature("rdfa-api 1.1")
Manu Sporny: document.hasFeature("rdfa-api 1.1") ←
14:22:37 <markbirbeck> document.hasFeature("rdfaapi", "1.1")
Mark Birbeck: document.hasFeature("rdfaapi", "1.1") ←
14:23:03 <manu> document.hasFeature("rdfa-api 1.0")
Manu Sporny: document.hasFeature("rdfa-api 1.0") ←
14:23:20 <manu> oh woops, Mark is correct
Manu Sporny: oh woops, Mark is correct ←
14:23:47 <Knud> mark: api version is in sync with RDFa core?
Mark Birbeck: api version is in sync with RDFa core? ←
14:23:54 <manu> document.hasFeature("rdfa-api, "1.1")
Manu Sporny: document.hasFeature("rdfa-api, "1.1") ←
14:24:56 <manu> So, something like this: document.implementation.hasFeature("rdfa-api, "1.1")
Manu Sporny: So, something like this: document.implementation.hasFeature("rdfa-api, "1.1") ←
14:25:31 <Knud> mark: we should not say "we provide hasFeature", but instead "when you call hasFeature, this should happen:"
Mark Birbeck: we should not say "we provide hasFeature", but instead "when you call hasFeature, this should happen:" ←
14:25:43 <Knud> ... this is in line with how other specs do it
... this is in line with how other specs do it ←
14:26:30 <toby> <script implements="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/">...</script>
Toby Inkster: <script implements="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-api/">...</script> ←
14:26:36 <markbirbeck> This is boilerplate text:
Mark Birbeck: This is boilerplate text: ←
14:26:38 <markbirbeck> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-BBACDC08
Mark Birbeck: http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/core.html#ID-BBACDC08 ←
14:27:42 <ShaneM> toby: yeah, that. I really wanted that feature.
Toby Inkster: yeah, that. I really wanted that feature. [ Scribe Assist by Shane McCarron ] ←
14:29:17 <manu> PROPOSAL: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "rdfa-api" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version.
PROPOSED: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "rdfa-api" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version. ←
14:29:25 <toby> +1
Toby Inkster: +1 ←
14:29:28 <ShaneM> +1
Shane McCarron: +1 ←
14:29:35 <Knud> Knud: +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:29:40 <markbirbeck> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance
Mark Birbeck: http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance ←
14:31:10 <markbirbeck> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/feature.html
Mark Birbeck: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/feature.html ←
14:31:12 <manu> RDFaApi
Manu Sporny: RDFaApi ←
14:33:32 <toby> "rdfa-api" could be considered a relative URL reference with base http://www.w3.org/TR/.
Toby Inkster: "rdfa-api" could be considered a relative URL reference with base http://www.w3.org/TR/. ←
14:34:09 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:34:24 <Knud> general discussion on what to use as the feature string: URI, camel case, hyphen, ...
general discussion on what to use as the feature string: URI, camel case, hyphen, ... ←
14:34:45 <ShaneM> consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Shane McCarron: consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds ←
14:35:49 <manu> PROPOSAL: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "RDFaAPI" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version.
PROPOSED: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "RDFaAPI" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version. ←
14:36:13 <ShaneM> +1
Shane McCarron: +1 ←
14:36:13 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:36:14 <Knud> Knud: +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:36:17 <toby> +1 (though I'd still prefer 'rdfa-api')
Toby Inkster: +1 (though I'd still prefer 'rdfa-api') ←
14:37:05 <manu> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance
Manu Sporny: http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Core/introduction.html#ID-Conformance ←
14:37:36 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:37:44 <manu> RESOLVED: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "RDFaAPI" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version.
RESOLVED: Bring hasFeature() in line with the DOMImplementation interface, use "RDFaAPI" as the feature string, and "1.1" as the version. ←
14:38:09 <Knud> TOPIC: ISSUE-32: TypedLiteralConverter improvements
14:38:15 <manu> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0055.html
Manu Sporny: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2010Jun/0055.html ←
14:38:18 <markbirbeck> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#feature-detection
Mark Birbeck: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#feature-detection ←
14:38:45 <markbirbeck> RDFa.API
Mark Birbeck: RDFa.API ←
14:40:32 <manu> q+ to point out that we allow functions already.
Manu Sporny: q+ to point out that we allow functions already. ←
14:41:12 <Knud> Mark: we should make very clear how callback functions/methods should be implemented
Mark Birbeck: we should make very clear how callback functions/methods should be implemented ←
14:41:39 <manu> We already allow callback functions for TypedLiteralConverters: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-dom-api/#idl-def-TypedLiteralConverter
Manu Sporny: We already allow callback functions for TypedLiteralConverters: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-dom-api/#idl-def-TypedLiteralConverter ←
14:42:44 <manu> ack manu
Manu Sporny: ack manu ←
14:42:44 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to point out that we allow functions already.
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, you wanted to point out that we allow functions already. ←
14:42:58 <Knud> ... also, people might only want to define one callback function for different datatypes, so the callback function should have a parameter to say what it should convert
... also, people might only want to define one callback function for different datatypes, so the callback function should have a parameter to say what it should convert ←
14:43:25 <Knud> ... finally, we should define how the callback reacts when conversion is not possible (exception, return null, etc.)
... finally, we should define how the callback reacts when conversion is not possible (exception, return null, etc.) ←
14:43:36 <toby> first class functions
Toby Inkster: first class functions ←
14:45:25 <Knud> ... for the third point, the parameter should say what the function is converting _to_
... for the third point, the parameter should say what the function is converting _to_ ←
14:45:32 <manu> q+ to discuss point 3
Manu Sporny: q+ to discuss point 3 ←
14:45:34 <manu> ack manu
Manu Sporny: ack manu ←
14:45:34 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to discuss point 3
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, you wanted to discuss point 3 ←
14:47:10 <markbirbeck> var converter = function (value) { return new String(value) };
Mark Birbeck: var converter = function (value) { return new String(value) }; ←
14:47:10 <markbirbeck> document.data.context.registerTypeConverter("xsd:string", converter);
Mark Birbeck: document.data.context.registerTypeConverter("xsd:string", converter); ←
14:47:51 <markbirbeck> document.data.context.registerTypeConverter("xsd:string",
Mark Birbeck: document.data.context.registerTypeConverter("xsd:string", ←
14:47:55 <markbirbeck> function (value) { return new String(value) }
Mark Birbeck: function (value) { return new String(value) } ←
14:47:55 <Knud> mark: if there is one function per conversion type, then we wouldn't need the extra parameter.
Mark Birbeck: if there is one function per conversion type, then we wouldn't need the extra parameter. ←
14:47:59 <markbirbeck> );
Mark Birbeck: ); ←
14:48:23 <Knud> ... when we want to allow one function for all conversion types, then we need an extra parameter
... when we want to allow one function for all conversion types, then we need an extra parameter ←
14:48:46 <toby> http://esw.pastebin.com/m9CXB8qh
Toby Inkster: http://esw.pastebin.com/m9CXB8qh ←
14:50:37 <manu> PROPOSAL: Add a parameter to convertType() that indicates the type that is being converted.
PROPOSED: Add a parameter to convertType() that indicates the type that is being converted. ←
14:50:44 <Knud> Knud: shouldn't it be 'converted to'?
Knud Möller: shouldn't it be 'converted to'? ←
14:51:00 <toby> +0
Toby Inkster: +0 ←
14:51:03 <markbirbeck> +1
Mark Birbeck: +1 ←
14:51:14 <Knud> Knud: +1
Knud Möller: +1 ←
14:51:27 <ShaneM> abstain - I don't grok the issue
Shane McCarron: abstain - I don't grok the issue ←
14:51:36 <manu> +1
Manu Sporny: +1 ←
14:52:19 <manu> RESOLVED: Add a parameter to convertType() that indicates the type that is being converted.
RESOLVED: Add a parameter to convertType() that indicates the type that is being converted. ←
14:52:44 <Knud> we are resolving this issue with a string of different proposals
we are resolving this issue with a string of different proposals ←
14:53:33 <markbirbeck> "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer
Mark Birbeck: "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer ←
14:53:41 <Knud> SubTopic: Conversion guidance when authoring TypedLiteralConverters
14:54:49 <Knud> Mark: We need to provide better guidance on what do to when authoring TypedLiteralConverters. For example, "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer fails the range check for xsd:integer, but applying a Javascript integer converter would return the number 23 even though this is an RDF range violation. We should suggest that authors be aware of this sort of issue when writing range checks.
Mark Birbeck: We need to provide better guidance on what do to when authoring TypedLiteralConverters. For example, "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer fails the range check for xsd:integer, but applying a Javascript integer converter would return the number 23 even though this is an RDF range violation. We should suggest that authors be aware of this sort of issue when writing range checks. ←
14:54:00 <toby> q+
Toby Inkster: q+ ←
14:54:49 <manu> ack toby
Manu Sporny: ack toby ←
14:54:52 <manu> Toby: We also want to let authors know that RDF processors may not even allow "23 elephants" to be expressed or they may modify it to "23" before sending it up to the RDFa API. RDF processors are allowed to do this kind of modification of Typed Literals based on range checking. Authors shouldn't depend on ever getting "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer.
Toby Inkster: We also want to let authors know that RDF processors may not even allow "23 elephants" to be expressed or they may modify it to "23" before sending it up to the RDFa API. RDF processors are allowed to do this kind of modification of Typed Literals based on range checking. Authors shouldn't depend on ever getting "23 elephants"^^xsd:integer. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:56:56 <manu> Mark: It's beside the point, though, because we could have something like "23 blah"^^my:foo that only allows three values "red", "green" and "purple". The RDF processor is going to send that up, but the developer is still going to have to recognize that "23 blah" is not in the correct range. We need to let developers know that they should be aware of ranges.
Mark Birbeck: It's beside the point, though, because we could have something like "23 blah"^^my:foo that only allows three values "red", "green" and "purple". The RDF processor is going to send that up, but the developer is still going to have to recognize that "23 blah" is not in the correct range. We need to let developers know that they should be aware of ranges. [ Scribe Assist by Manu Sporny ] ←
14:58:26 <manu> q+ to end the call.
Manu Sporny: q+ to end the call. ←
15:00:41 <manu> ack manu
Manu Sporny: ack manu ←
15:00:41 <Zakim> manu, you wanted to end the call.
Zakim IRC Bot: manu, you wanted to end the call. ←
15:00:55 <Zakim> -toby
Zakim IRC Bot: -toby ←
15:00:57 <Zakim> -markbirbeck
Zakim IRC Bot: -markbirbeck ←
15:00:59 <Zakim> -Knud
Zakim IRC Bot: -Knud ←
15:01:04 <Zakim> -manu.a
Zakim IRC Bot: -manu.a ←
15:01:06 <Zakim> -ShaneM
Zakim IRC Bot: -ShaneM ←
15:01:11 <manu> zakim, who is on the call?
Manu Sporny: zakim, who is on the call? ←
15:01:11 <Zakim> On the phone I see manu
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see manu ←
15:01:17 <manu> zakim, drop manu
Manu Sporny: zakim, drop manu ←
15:01:17 <Zakim> manu is being disconnected
Zakim IRC Bot: manu is being disconnected ←
15:01:18 <Zakim> SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended ←
15:01:20 <Zakim> Attendees were Knud, manu, +44.785.583.aaaa, toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM, +8014aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were Knud, manu, +44.785.583.aaaa, toby, markbirbeck, ShaneM, +8014aabb ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2010-08-05 15:32:09 UTC by 'msporny', comments: 'Minor fix-ups and elaborations to the minutes.'