See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 16 February 2010
<scribe> Scribe: Mark
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
Mark: Action 138 - still
open
... Action 139 - done
close action-139
<trackbot> ACTION-139 Apply the resolution for issue 25 closed
Mark: Action 140 - done
close action-140
<trackbot> ACTION-140 Apply the resolution for issue 24 closed
Mark: Action 141 - done
close action-141
<trackbot> ACTION-141 Apply the resolution for issue 26 closed
http://www.w3.org/mid/OFB082B8A0.A60F118C-ON802576CC.0042F7AE-802576CC.00491A4B%2540uk.ibm.com
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0011.html
No objections to application resolution for Issue 24
RESOLUTION: Issue 24 can be closed
Issue 25 - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0009.html
No objections to applied resolution for Issue 25
RESOLUTION: Issue 25 can be closed
Issue 26 - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0012.html
No objections to applied resolution for Issue 26
RESOLUTION: Issue 26 can be closed
Eric: We should talk about test cases 13-16
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0013
Test cases 13-14 are WSDL 1.1 - look like good basic tests to check at l;east some precedence rules have been implements
Eric: Test cases 6 & 7 have ReplyTo on the binding - not the most sensible place for the Reply parameter
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-142 - Revise test cases 6 & 7 to pick a more sensible property than replyToName to come from thewsdl binding [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].
Eric: One more WSDL assertion to cover
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-143 - Ensure that we have tests for all the WSDL assertions [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].
Eric: We need to check that the
test cases and the assertions still actually correspond in
light of recent spec. changes
... This will be a big job - willing to do about half
Phil: Will look at the other half...
<scribe> ACTION: Phil to review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-144 - Review half the test cases (and send a note to Eric saying which ones ) [on Phil Adams - due 2010-02-23].
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to review the other half of the test cases [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Review the other half of the test cases [on Eric Johnson - due 2010-02-23].
Still pending Oracle's comeback on action in the SCA TC
Eric: Once document is published
with new terms agreed we will resubmit to the IETF URI review
list and then submit to be published (which could take 4
months)
... So having the latest IETF copyright terms will help to
avoid procedural issues
None
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: mphillip Found Scribe: Mark WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Eric Mark Phil joined padams padams2 soap-jms trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Feb/0008.html Found Date: 16 Feb 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/16-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: eric phil WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]