ISSUE-20: Graphs aware stores vs. quad stores for SPARQL/update (empty graphs)
Graphs aware stores vs. quad stores for SPARQL/update (empty graphs)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- David Charboneau
- Opened on:
- 2009-05-07
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- FW: To all SPARQL editores! issues/schedule for next publication round... (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-04-27)
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-22)
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-20)
- Re: Pending issues for update (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-19)
- Pending issues for update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-02-16)
- Prioritized issues / Query (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-02-03)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-14)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-14)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-01-14)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (from rnewman@twinql.com on 2010-01-12)
- Update ISSUEs summary of how far we got today (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-01-12)
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-12)
- Re: Update on Update (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-01-12)
- Re: Review of 'SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs' (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-01-12)
- Re: HTTP RDF Update review (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-01-12)
- Re: Review of 'SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs' (from ogbujic@ccf.org on 2010-01-12)
- Re: brief review on protocol (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-01-10)
- brief review on protocol (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-01-09)
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-08)
- Re: Review of 'SPARQL 1.1 Update' (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-01-08)
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-01-08)
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2010-01-08)
- Re: ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-07)
- Re: Update on Update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-07)
- Re: Review of 'SPARQL 1.1 Update' (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-01-07)
- ISSUE-20: SPARQL Update: Empty vs non-existent graphs (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-12-23)
- Re: Update on Update (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-12-23)
- Review of 'SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs' (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-12-22)
- Re: ACTION summary (from birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk on 2009-12-22)
- ACTION summary (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-12-22)
- Update on Update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-12-18)
- Re: Update review (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-10-16)
- Re: Update review (from luke.wilson-mawer@garlik.com on 2009-10-16)
- Re: Update review (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-10-15)
- Re: Update review (from sschenk@uni-koblenz.de on 2009-10-15)
- Update review (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-10-07)
- [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues. (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-05-26)
- SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 26-May (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-05-25)
Related notes:
[LeeF]: Consensus at F2F2 is that the Update langauge & semantics should support the notion of a graph that exists but is empty
3 Nov 2009, 17:56:29ISSUE-52 depends on this one
Axel Polleres, 7 Dec 2009, 22:54:48[LeeF]: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-20 via adoption http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/index.php?title=Lees_Update_Graph_Model&oldid=1995 in SPARQL Update, no objections, Sandro abstaining
25 Mar 2010, 14:46:42[LeeF]: resolved by noting that our current work does not specify anything about the relationship between entailment regimes and SPARQL Update
26 Mar 2010, 18:14:23Display change log