ISSUE-20
Graphs aware stores vs. quad stores for SPARQL/update (empty graphs)
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2009-05-07
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Update review (from gearon@ieee.org on 2009-10-16)
- Re: Update review (from luke.wilson-mawer@garlik.com on 2009-10-16)
- Re: Update review (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-10-15)
- Re: Update review (from sschenk@uni-koblenz.de on 2009-10-15)
- Update review (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2009-10-07)
- [ACTION-33] Trying to sort the SPARQL/Update issues. (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-05-26)
- SPARQL WG telecon agenda: Tues 26-May (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2009-05-25)
Related notes:
2009-11-03 17:56:29: [LeeF]: Consensus at F2F2 is that the Update langauge & semantics should support the notion of a graph that exists but is empty
Display change log
