Need to put GSP test suite on next week's agenda
<kasei> Present: Greg, AndyS, bglimm, SteveH, chimezie, MattPerry, pgearon, Lee_Feigenbaum
13:59:32 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/31-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/31-sparql-irc ←
13:59:34 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
13:59:36 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
13:59:36 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute ←
13:59:37 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
13:59:37 <trackbot> Date: 31 July 2012
13:59:45 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
13:59:45 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AndyS ←
13:59:46 <Zakim> On IRC I see RRSAgent, MattPerry, bglimm, MacTed, LeeF, AndyS, iv_an_ru, SteveH, pgearon, trackbot, kasei, sandro, ya, ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see RRSAgent, MattPerry, bglimm, MacTed, LeeF, AndyS, iv_an_ru, SteveH, pgearon, trackbot, kasei, sandro, ya, ericP ←
14:00:13 <AndyS> zakim, start 77277
Andy Seaborne: zakim, start 77277 ←
14:00:13 <Zakim> I don't understand 'start 77277', AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: I don't understand 'start 77277', AndyS ←
14:00:19 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:00:19 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AndyS
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has not yet started, AndyS ←
14:00:20 <Zakim> On IRC I see RRSAgent, MattPerry, bglimm, MacTed, LeeF, AndyS, iv_an_ru, SteveH, pgearon, trackbot, kasei, sandro, ya, ericP
Zakim IRC Bot: On IRC I see RRSAgent, MattPerry, bglimm, MacTed, LeeF, AndyS, iv_an_ru, SteveH, pgearon, trackbot, kasei, sandro, ya, ericP ←
14:00:31 <SteveH> Zakim, this is 77277
Steve Harris: Zakim, this is 77277 ←
14:00:31 <Zakim> ok, SteveH; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, SteveH; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
14:00:38 <AndyS> zakim, who is on the phone?
Andy Seaborne: zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:00:39 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P2, kasei, ??P6, ??P8
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see ??P2, kasei, ??P6, ??P8 ←
14:00:48 <AndyS> zakim, ??P2 is me
Andy Seaborne: zakim, ??P2 is me ←
14:00:48 <Zakim> +AndyS; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AndyS; got it ←
14:00:53 <bglimm> Zakim, ??P8 is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, ??P8 is me ←
14:00:53 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
14:01:02 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:01:02 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:01:09 <SteveH> Zakim, ??P6 is me
Steve Harris: Zakim, ??P6 is me ←
14:01:09 <Zakim> +SteveH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +SteveH; got it ←
14:01:16 <bglimm> ack me
Birte Glimm: ack me ←
14:01:23 <bglimm> Zakim, ack me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, ack me ←
14:01:23 <Zakim> I see ??P8, ??P6 on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see ??P8, ??P6 on the speaker queue ←
14:01:33 <SteveH> Zakim, q=
Steve Harris: Zakim, q= ←
14:01:35 <Zakim> SteveH, if you meant to query the queue, please say 'q?'; if you meant to replace the queue, please say 'queue= ...'
Zakim IRC Bot: SteveH, if you meant to query the queue, please say 'q?'; if you meant to replace the queue, please say 'queue= ...' ←
14:01:45 <SteveH> Zakim, queue=
Steve Harris: Zakim, queue= ←
14:01:45 <Zakim> I see no one on the speaker queue
Zakim IRC Bot: I see no one on the speaker queue ←
14:01:58 <bglimm> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Birte Glimm: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:01:58 <Zakim> On the phone I see AndyS, kasei, SteveH, bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see AndyS, kasei, SteveH, bglimm ←
14:02:20 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:02:22 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:02:54 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aaaa ←
14:03:00 <Zakim> + +1.216.694.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.216.694.aabb ←
14:03:07 <chimezie> Zakim, +1.216.694.aabb is me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, +1.216.694.aabb is me ←
14:03:07 <Zakim> +chimezie; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +chimezie; got it ←
14:03:10 <MattPerry> zakim, aaaa is me
Matthew Perry: zakim, aaaa is me ←
14:03:10 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry; got it ←
14:03:16 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
14:03:16 <Zakim> chimezie should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie should now be muted ←
14:04:05 <Zakim> +pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: +pgearon ←
14:05:32 <SteveH> ping LeeF ?
Steve Harris: ping LeeF ? ←
14:06:55 <AndyS> OK - plan C in a couple of mins - ad hoc.
Andy Seaborne: OK - plan C in a couple of mins - ad hoc. ←
14:07:14 <SteveH> I have to go in about 10 mins
Steve Harris: I have to go in about 10 mins ←
14:07:58 <bglimm> at least we could record holiday plans
Birte Glimm: at least we could record holiday plans ←
14:08:10 <SteveH> I can scribe for 10 mins
Steve Harris: I can scribe for 10 mins ←
14:08:16 <kasei> i can do it after that
Gregory Williams: i can do it after that ←
14:08:39 <SteveH> AndyS: queyr went to 3rd LC - no substantive comments
Andy Seaborne: queyr went to 3rd LC - no substantive comments [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:08:54 <SteveH> … one question from David B., just a question
Steve Harris: … one question from David B., just a question ←
14:08:55 <LeeF> I'm here, I'm here. Sigh, I stink.
Lee Feigenbaum: I'm here, I'm here. Sigh, I stink. ←
14:09:23 <Zakim> +Lee_Feigenbaum
Zakim IRC Bot: +Lee_Feigenbaum ←
14:09:34 <SteveH> … message from Greg about testsuite status
Steve Harris: … message from Greg about testsuite status ←
14:09:53 <SteveH> … few update issues around
Steve Harris: … few update comments around ←
14:10:04 <SteveH> s/issues/comments/
14:10:14 <SteveH> pgearon: not sure, some are not done
Paul Gearon: not sure, some are not done [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:10:39 <SteveH> … will chase them up after the (abreviated) call
Steve Harris: … will chase them up after the (abreviated) call ←
14:10:53 <SteveH> AndyS: couple of David B comments
Andy Seaborne: couple of David B comments [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:11:26 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:11:26 <Zakim> chimezie should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: chimezie should no longer be muted ←
14:11:29 <SteveH> … and some for chimezie
Steve Harris: … and some for chimezie ←
14:11:54 <SteveH> chimezie: are there a couple of GSP comments still open
Chimezie Ogbuji: are there a couple of GSP comments still open [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:11:57 <SteveH> AndyS: yes
Andy Seaborne: yes [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:12:01 <AndyS> KK-6, GR-3
Andy Seaborne: KK-6, GR-3 ←
14:12:07 <AndyS> KK-6, GR-3
Andy Seaborne: KK-6, GR-3 ←
14:12:09 <AndyS> GR-4
Andy Seaborne: GR-4 ←
14:12:15 <AndyS> KK-8, KK-9
Andy Seaborne: KK-8, KK-9 ←
14:12:24 <AndyS> KK-13
Andy Seaborne: KK-13 ←
14:12:24 <SteveH> AndyS: I think some of these are done
Andy Seaborne: I think some of these are done [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:12:29 <SteveH> … from memory
Steve Harris: … from memory ←
14:12:59 <Zakim> -chimezie
Zakim IRC Bot: -chimezie ←
14:13:03 <chimezie> Will check those
Chimezie Ogbuji: Will check those ←
14:13:16 <AndyS> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
Andy Seaborne: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
14:13:32 <SteveH> AndyS: looking for red comments
Andy Seaborne: looking for red comments [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:14:56 <AndyS> RC-2 draft
Andy Seaborne: RC-2 draft ←
14:16:23 <SteveH> Topic: testsuite
Summary: Need to put GSP test suite on next week's agenda
14:16:30 <kasei> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html
Gregory Williams: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html ←
14:16:35 <SteveH> kasei: sent email ^^
Gregory Williams: sent email ^^ [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:16:47 <SteveH> .. there's a few typos, but in general I think it's the current state
Steve Harris: .. there's a few typos, but in general I think it's the current state ←
14:16:54 <SteveH> … about 12 tests need unapproving
Steve Harris: … about 12 tests need unapproving ←
14:17:01 <SteveH> … one needs changing
Steve Harris: … one needs changing ←
14:17:17 <SteveH> … there's a list of tests that are waiting agreement, but have multiple agreement
Steve Harris: … there's a list of tests that are waiting agreement, but have multiple agreement ←
14:17:29 <SteveH> s/agreement$/implementation/
Steve Harris: s/agreement$/implementation/ (warning: replacement failed) ←
14:17:51 <SteveH> AndyS: can we do the unaproving, all to do with BINDINGS
Andy Seaborne: can we do the unaproving, all to do with BINDINGS [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:18:14 <SteveH> … and can we do the fix, and go for mass approval of long list later
Steve Harris: … and can we do the fix, and go for mass approval of long list later ←
14:19:06 <SteveH> AndyS: let unapprove a PP test too
Andy Seaborne: let unapprove a PP test too [ Scribe Assist by Steve Harris ] ←
14:19:29 <LeeF> #pp28
Lee Feigenbaum: #pp28 ←
14:19:45 <kasei> and bindings/manifest#b1 - #b8
Gregory Williams: and bindings/manifest#b1 - #b8 ←
14:20:16 <kasei> scribenick: kasei
(Scribe set to Gregory Williams)
14:20:20 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Unapprove tests bindings/manifest#b[1-8] and syntax-query/manifest#test_3[5-8] and services/manifest#service4 and property-path/manifest#pp28 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html
PROPOSED: Unapprove tests bindings/manifest#b[1-8] and syntax-query/manifest#test_3[5-8] and services/manifest#service4 and property-path/manifest#pp28 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html ←
14:20:26 <Zakim> -SteveH
Zakim IRC Bot: -SteveH ←
14:20:32 <AndyS> +1
Andy Seaborne: +1 ←
14:20:40 <MattPerry> +1
Matthew Perry: +1 ←
14:20:41 <kasei> +1
+1 ←
14:20:42 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
14:20:43 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Unapprove tests bindings/manifest#b[1-8] and syntax-query/manifest#test_3[5-8] and services/manifest#service4 and property-path/manifest#pp28 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html
RESOLVED: Unapprove tests bindings/manifest#b[1-8] and syntax-query/manifest#test_3[5-8] and services/manifest#service4 and property-path/manifest#pp28 as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JulSep/0081.html ←
14:21:22 <kasei> kasei: I can commit these changes after the call.
Gregory Williams: I can commit these changes after the call. ←
14:21:26 <LeeF> ACTION: Gregory to record unapprovals
ACTION: Gregory to record unapprovals ←
14:21:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-662 - Record unapprovals [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-08-07].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-662 - Record unapprovals [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-08-07]. ←
14:21:28 <kasei> AndyS: I can write a new test for pp28
Andy Seaborne: I can write a new test for pp28 ←
14:21:41 <kasei> ... and can run all the tests.
... and can run all the tests. ←
14:21:44 <LeeF> ACTION: Andy to write a new test for pp28 and run a new report for ARQ on all the tests
ACTION: Andy to write a new test for pp28 and run a new report for ARQ on all the tests ←
14:21:45 <trackbot> Created ACTION-663 - Write a new test for pp28 and run a new report for ARQ on all the tests [on Andy Seaborne - due 2012-08-07].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-663 - Write a new test for pp28 and run a new report for ARQ on all the tests [on Andy Seaborne - due 2012-08-07]. ←
14:22:01 <kasei> LeeF: that would bring us totally up to date on query, correct?
Lee Feigenbaum: that would bring us totally up to date on query, correct? ←
14:22:03 <kasei> AndyS: yes.
Andy Seaborne: yes. ←
14:22:22 <kasei> LeeF: what's the situation with the two notclassified update tests?
Lee Feigenbaum: what's the situation with the two notclassified update tests? ←
14:24:25 <kasei> kasei: this was the fix to Axel's new-ish test (regarding parsing of bnodes)
Gregory Williams: this was the fix to Axel's new-ish test (regarding parsing of bnodes) ←
14:24:59 <kasei> ... the fix needs approval with all the rest next week.
... the fix needs approval with all the rest next week. ←
14:25:25 <kasei> LeeF: what about entailment tests?
Lee Feigenbaum: what about entailment tests? ←
14:25:40 <kasei> ... are there people we should reach out to that could run the test suite?
... are there people we should reach out to that could run the test suite? ←
14:25:49 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:25:49 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
14:26:18 <kasei> bglimm: I haven't finished implementation, and am going on holiday. Will try to do that when I get back.
Birte Glimm: I haven't finished implementation, and am going on holiday. Will try to do that when I get back. ←
14:26:41 <kasei> ... I can run the tests, but still some things that I need to fix before I can do a proper implementation report.
... I can run the tests, but still some things that I need to fix before I can do a proper implementation report. ←
14:26:55 <kasei> bglimm: I'm only implementing the direct semantics regime.
Birte Glimm: I'm only implementing the direct semantics regime. ←
14:26:59 <LeeF> kasei, sorry
Lee Feigenbaum: kasei, sorry ←
14:27:06 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:27:06 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:27:26 <bglimm> Jeff is implementing at the moment
Birte Glimm: Jeff is implementing at the moment ←
14:27:52 <bglimm> and I also contacted Michael Schneider and he is currently working on the RDF-Based semantics regime
Birte Glimm: and I also contacted Michael Schneider and he is currently working on the RDF-Based semantics regime ←
14:28:04 <kasei> LeeF: Stardog does some entailment. Do we know specifics?
Lee Feigenbaum: Stardog does some entailment. Do we know specifics? ←
14:28:05 <bglimm> I haven't talked to Kendall yet
Birte Glimm: I haven't talked to Kendall yet ←
14:28:17 <bglimm> Michael Schneider will also support RDF and RDFS
Birte Glimm: Michael Schneider will also support RDF and RDFS ←
14:28:32 <bglimm> We'll need RIF implementations
Birte Glimm: We'll need RIF implementations ←
14:28:50 <kasei> ... would be good to determine where we stand in terms of which tests we think will have implementation coverage.
... would be good to determine where we stand in terms of which tests we think will have implementation coverage. ←
14:28:56 <bglimm> Chime maybe?
Birte Glimm: Chime maybe? ←
14:29:17 <pgearon> Errr… I implement RIF
Paul Gearon: Errr… I implement RIF ←
14:29:23 <bglimm> :-)
Birte Glimm: :-) ←
14:30:02 <kasei> LeeF: paul, can we get you to run the entailment tests?
Lee Feigenbaum: paul, can we get you to run the entailment tests? ←
14:30:08 <bglimm> I guess we also need more tests ;-)
Birte Glimm: I guess we also need more tests ;-) ←
14:30:12 <kasei> pgearon: I can try to get it done outside of work.
Paul Gearon: I can try to get it done outside of work. ←
14:30:20 <bglimm> That's also still on my TODO list
Birte Glimm: That's also still on my TODO list ←
14:30:45 <kasei> AndyS: I'm sure revelytix would like to be on th implementation report.
Andy Seaborne: I'm sure revelytix would like to be on th implementation report. ←
14:31:51 <kasei> LeeF: service description?
Lee Feigenbaum: service description? ←
14:32:55 <kasei> kasei: Chime and I both have implementations that pass the tests.
Gregory Williams: Chime and I both have implementations that pass the tests. ←
14:32:59 <kasei> ... need to approve the tests.
... need to approve the tests. ←
14:33:20 <kasei> LeeF: could we approve the tests right now?
Lee Feigenbaum: could we approve the tests right now? ←
14:34:39 <kasei> https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-sdvalidator
https://github.com/kasei/sparql11-sdvalidator ←
14:35:29 <kasei> kasei: the documentation at the github page for the service description validator has some brief description of the three tests.
Gregory Williams: the documentation at the github page for the service description validator has some brief description of the three tests. ←
14:36:08 <kasei> LeeF: happy with the three test descriptions.
Lee Feigenbaum: happy with the three test descriptions. ←
14:36:54 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/
Lee Feigenbaum: PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/ ←
14:37:42 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf
Lee Feigenbaum: PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf ←
14:37:46 <kasei> +1
+1 ←
14:37:58 <LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf
PROPOSED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf ←
14:38:01 <LeeF> RESOLVED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf
RESOLVED: Approve the 3 service description tests service-description/manifest#conforms-to-schema service-description/manifest#has-endpoint-triple & service-description/manifest#returns-rdf ←
14:38:11 <LeeF> ACTION: Gregory to mark the Sd tests as approved
ACTION: Gregory to mark the Sd tests as approved ←
14:38:11 <trackbot> Created ACTION-664 - Mark the Sd tests as approved [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-08-07].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-664 - Mark the Sd tests as approved [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-08-07]. ←
14:38:42 <kasei> LeeF: protocol validator status?
Lee Feigenbaum: protocol validator status? ←
14:40:11 <kasei> kasei: I had gotten about half way through the work on implementing the protocol validator.
Gregory Williams: I had gotten about half way through the work on implementing the protocol validator. ←
14:40:22 <kasei> ... good idea on path forward, just having trouble finding the time to finish it.
... good idea on path forward, just having trouble finding the time to finish it. ←
14:40:37 <kasei> LeeF: have we discussed GSP testing?
Lee Feigenbaum: have we discussed GSP testing? ←
14:41:04 <kasei> ... need to add that to the agenda (next week)
... need to add that to the agenda (next week) ←
14:41:25 <kasei> ... who implements GSP?
... who implements GSP? ←
14:41:41 <kasei> kasei: Kjetil has been working on an implementation. could check with him on status.
Gregory Williams: Kjetil has been working on an implementation. could check with him on status. ←
14:41:47 <kasei> AndyS: I do. Steve does as well.
Andy Seaborne: I do. Steve does as well. ←
14:42:29 <LeeF> Summary: Need to put GSP test suite on next week's agenda
14:42:52 <kasei> LeeF: should be able to wrap up query and update next week.
Lee Feigenbaum: should be able to wrap up query and update next week. ←
14:43:03 <kasei> ... JSON is fine. Federation should be done next week.
... JSON is fine. Federation should be done next week. ←
14:43:11 <kasei> ... entailment has a path forward, but we don't know the timeline yet.
... entailment has a path forward, but we don't know the timeline yet. ←
14:43:11 <bglimm> I updated last years vacation list: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Vacation_List2012
Birte Glimm: I updated last years vacation list: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Vacation_List2012 ←
14:43:15 <kasei> ... CSV/TSV is fine.
... CSV/TSV is fine. ←
14:43:22 <kasei> ... SD has a path forward that should be quick.
... SD has a path forward that should be quick. ←
14:43:30 <bglimm> So we could also record our vacation plans there
Birte Glimm: So we could also record our vacation plans there ←
14:43:30 <kasei> ... Protocol has a path forward, but work needed to make progress.
... Protocol has a path forward, but work needed to make progress. ←
14:43:35 <AndyS> q+ to speak when this section is finished
Andy Seaborne: q+ to speak when this section is finished ←
14:43:37 <kasei> ... GSP needs discussion next week.
... GSP needs discussion next week. ←
14:44:11 <kasei> AndyS: advertisement of recent publication?
Andy Seaborne: advertisement of recent publication? ←
14:44:27 <kasei> LeeF: W3C announcement has been done. haven't reached out to RDF WG yet. let's do that now.
Lee Feigenbaum: W3C announcement has been done. haven't reached out to RDF WG yet. let's do that now. ←
14:44:35 <AndyS> ack me
Andy Seaborne: ack me ←
14:44:35 <Zakim> AndyS, you wanted to speak when this section is finished
Zakim IRC Bot: AndyS, you wanted to speak when this section is finished ←
14:45:04 <bglimm> OWL WG?
Birte Glimm: OWL WG? ←
14:45:12 <bglimm> RIF?
Birte Glimm: RIF? ←
14:45:47 <bglimm> Also we got both RIF and OWL to review the Ent. Regimes doc I believe
Birte Glimm: Althouhg we got both RIF and OWL to review the Ent. Regimes doc I believe ←
14:46:10 <bglimm> s/Also/Althouhg/
14:46:49 <kasei> q+ to ask about test suite CVS
q+ to ask about test suite CVS ←
14:47:50 <kasei> LeeF: anything specific we want other groups to look at?
Lee Feigenbaum: anything specific we want other groups to look at? ←
14:48:12 <kasei> ... at risk parts of document?
... at risk parts of document? ←
14:49:48 <kasei> LeeF: the at risk note at the start of query section 19... all 4 of those changes are in the document currently?
Lee Feigenbaum: the at risk note at the start of query section 19... all 4 of those changes are in the document currently? ←
14:50:15 <kasei> AndyS: would have to check how \u escapes are worded.
Andy Seaborne: would have to check how \u escapes are worded. ←
14:50:32 <kasei> ... I think the statement is true.
... I think the statement is true. ←
14:50:53 <kasei> ... shouldn't be a colon in the 3rd bullet point.
... shouldn't be a colon in the 3rd bullet point. ←
14:51:31 <kasei> LeeF: will include this as something to look at in reviews.
Lee Feigenbaum: will include this as something to look at in reviews. ←
14:53:37 <LeeF> q?
Lee Feigenbaum: q? ←
14:54:22 <LeeF> ack kasei
Lee Feigenbaum: ack kasei ←
14:54:22 <Zakim> kasei, you wanted to ask about test suite CVS
Zakim IRC Bot: kasei, you wanted to ask about test suite CVS ←
14:55:13 <kasei> kasei: wondering if we ever figured out the problems with CVS that were yielding outdated versions of the test suite via http.
Gregory Williams: wondering if we ever figured out the problems with CVS that were yielding outdated versions of the test suite via http. ←
14:55:34 <kasei> LeeF: don't remember this issue.
Lee Feigenbaum: don't remember this issue. ←
14:57:43 <kasei> kasei: jeen had suggested publishing a tarball of the test suite once its stabilized.
Gregory Williams: jeen had suggested publishing a tarball of the test suite once its stabilized. ←
14:57:44 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Vacation_List2012
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Vacation_List2012 ←
14:57:49 <kasei> LeeF: happy to do that when we get there.
Lee Feigenbaum: happy to do that when we get there. ←
14:58:20 <pgearon> +q
Paul Gearon: +q ←
14:58:25 <LeeF> ack pgearon
Lee Feigenbaum: ack pgearon ←
14:58:45 <LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Future_Work_Items
Lee Feigenbaum: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Future_Work_Items ←
14:58:48 <kasei> pgearon: one of david booth's comments was a wish list item. is there a document where we're keeping things like that?
Paul Gearon: one of david booth's comments was a wish list item. is there a document where we're keeping things like that? ←
14:58:59 <pgearon> q-
Paul Gearon: q- ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#2) generated 2012-07-31 15:13:51 UTC by 'gwilliam', comments: 'Removed Carlos from regrets list (not recognized as an active member).'