None.
14:00:34 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-sparql-irc
RRSAgent IRC Bot: logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-sparql-irc ←
14:00:36 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
Trackbot IRC Bot: RRSAgent, make logs world ←
14:00:36 <bglimm> Zakim, I am here
Birte Glimm: Zakim, I am here ←
14:00:36 <Zakim> sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'here'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'here' ←
14:00:38 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 77277
Trackbot IRC Bot: Zakim, this will be 77277 ←
14:00:38 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now ←
14:00:39 <trackbot> Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference
14:00:39 <trackbot> Date: 29 June 2010
14:00:44 <LeeF> zakim, this is SPARQL
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, this is SPARQL ←
14:00:44 <Zakim> ok, LeeF; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
Zakim IRC Bot: ok, LeeF; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
14:00:47 <bglimm> Zakim, I am bglimm
Birte Glimm: Zakim, I am bglimm ←
14:00:47 <Zakim> sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'bglimm'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, bglimm, I do not see a party named 'bglimm' ←
14:00:53 <LeeF> zakim, who's on the phone?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, who's on the phone? ←
14:00:54 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb ←
14:00:58 <Zakim> - +44.186.528.aaaa
Zakim IRC Bot: - +44.186.528.aaaa ←
14:01:09 <LeeF> zakim, code?
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, code? ←
14:01:10 <Zakim> the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), LeeF ←
14:01:18 <MattPerry> zakim, aabb is me
Matthew Perry: zakim, aabb is me ←
14:01:18 <Zakim> +MattPerry; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +MattPerry; got it ←
14:01:47 <Zakim> +AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: +AxelPolleres ←
14:01:56 <pgearon> morning Axel
Paul Gearon: morning Axel ←
14:01:58 <Zakim> +Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: +Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
14:02:06 <Zakim> + +1.617.553.aacc
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.617.553.aacc ←
14:02:13 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
14:02:15 <LeeF> zakim, aacc is me
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, aacc is me ←
14:02:18 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted ←
14:02:20 <Zakim> +LeeF; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +LeeF; got it ←
14:02:29 <AxelPolleres> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Axel Polleres: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:02:32 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF ←
14:02:38 <bglimm> I am just dialing in again
Birte Glimm: I am just dialing in again ←
14:02:46 <Zakim> + +44.186.528.aadd
Zakim IRC Bot: + +44.186.528.aadd ←
14:02:55 <bglimm> Zakim, +44.186.528.aadd is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, +44.186.528.aadd is me ←
14:02:55 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
14:03:02 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:03:02 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:03:23 <LeeF> (for the record, next week I'd like to discuss LET and also start reviewing & approving test cases)
Lee Feigenbaum: (for the record, next week I'd like to discuss LET and also start reviewing & approving test cases) ←
14:03:25 <AxelPolleres> scribe: paul gearon
(Scribe set to Paul Gearon)
14:03:30 <LeeF> scribenick: pgearon
14:03:37 <LeeF> Chair: AxelPolleres
14:03:42 <LeeF> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-29
14:03:43 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-29
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-29 ←
14:04:18 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: Focus on admin issues today. Action issues, etc
Axel Polleres: Focus on admin issues today. Action issues, etc ←
14:04:44 <bglimm> Axel, are you still talking? I can't hear any more
Birte Glimm: Axel, are you still talking? I can't hear any more ←
14:04:52 <pgearon> focus on tech issues tomorrow in upcoming testcases call
focus on tech issues tomorrow in upcoming testcases call ←
14:04:53 <bglimm> :-(
Birte Glimm: :-( ←
14:04:55 <Zakim> +??P1
Zakim IRC Bot: +??P1 ←
14:04:57 <bglimm> silence
Birte Glimm: silence ←
14:05:08 <NicholasH> Zakim, ??P1 is me
Nicholas Humfrey: Zakim, ??P1 is me ←
14:05:14 <Zakim> +NicholasH; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +NicholasH; got it ←
14:05:21 <bglimm> Yes, our telephone system has problems today and Zakim forces me to call US
Birte Glimm: Yes, our telephone system has problems today and Zakim forces me to call US ←
14:05:27 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
14:05:27 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: Summary of Semtech
Axel Polleres: Summary of Semtech ←
14:06:06 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:06:14 <AlexPassant> Zakim, +[IPcaller] is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, +[IPcaller] is me ←
14:06:14 <Zakim> sorry, AlexPassant, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]'
Zakim IRC Bot: sorry, AlexPassant, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' ←
14:06:30 <pgearon> LeeF: Tuesday gave a tutorial on SPARQL. Wednesday there was a SPARQL 1.1 panel. Fewer people at the panel
Lee Feigenbaum: Tuesday gave a tutorial on SPARQL. Wednesday there was a SPARQL 1.1 panel. Fewer people at the panel ←
14:06:51 <pgearon> LeeF: panel had questions on federation. One person asked about LET
Lee Feigenbaum: panel had questions on federation. One person asked about LET ←
14:07:25 <pgearon> LeeF: people in the community seem to be engaged in SPARQL and are following what we're doing
Lee Feigenbaum: people in the community seem to be engaged in SPARQL and are following what we're doing ←
14:08:46 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:08:46 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted ←
14:08:47 <pgearon> LeeF: no real criticism. One question about LET. Another question asking if we've defined everything needed for federation (which we aren't)
Lee Feigenbaum: no real criticism. One question about LET. Another question asking if we've defined everything needed for federation (which we aren't) ←
14:09:30 <pgearon> chimezie: presentation on REST and HTTP. Most of the feedback was just about filling in details of the protocol
Chimezie Ogbuji: presentation on REST and HTTP. Most of the feedback was just about filling in details of the protocol ←
14:10:02 <chimezie> Zakim, mute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, mute me ←
14:10:02 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should now be muted ←
14:10:21 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/ ←
14:10:22 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: RDF Next Steps workshop
Axel Polleres: RDF Next Steps workshop ←
14:11:19 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: lots of presentations, lots of differing opinions
Axel Polleres: lots of presentations, lots of differing opinions ←
14:11:49 <Zakim> +bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm ←
14:12:00 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: breakout groups on Semantics, Syntax, Named Graphs, and Linked Data issues
Axel Polleres: breakout groups on Semantics, Syntax, Named Graphs, and Linked Data issues ←
14:12:31 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: decided not to worry much about XML. Look at new syntax, and more "webby" things like JSON
Axel Polleres: decided not to worry much about XML. Look at new syntax, and more "webby" things like JSON ←
14:12:51 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:12:51 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:13:32 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: Semantics group wanted to align semantics with what people are expecting
Axel Polleres: Semantics group wanted to align semantics with what people are expecting ←
14:14:38 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: syntax - don't touch XML semantics. Annotations should be allowed in RDF, which will be different to current reification syntax
Axel Polleres: syntax - don't touch XML semantics. Annotations should be allowed in RDF, which will be different to current reification syntax ←
14:14:41 <LeeF> See http://www.w3.org/2010/06/rdf-work-items/table
Lee Feigenbaum: See http://www.w3.org/2010/06/rdf-work-items/table ←
14:15:02 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF/NextStepWorkshop
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF/NextStepWorkshop ←
14:15:26 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aaee
Zakim IRC Bot: + +1.603.897.aaee ←
14:15:28 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: using "weakly deprecated" on several features, such as reificiation. This means that people should avoid using them in new applications
Axel Polleres: using "weakly deprecated" on several features, such as reificiation. This means that people should avoid using them in new applications ←
14:15:35 <LeeF> zakim, aaee is Souri
Lee Feigenbaum: zakim, aaee is Souri ←
14:15:36 <Zakim> +Souri; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +Souri; got it ←
14:16:05 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller.a] ←
14:16:17 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
14:16:26 <bglimm> Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is me ←
14:16:26 <Zakim> +bglimm; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +bglimm; got it ←
14:16:30 <AxelPolleres> topic: Comments
14:16:30 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
14:16:31 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments ←
14:16:34 <AlexPassant> Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, [IPcaller] is me ←
14:16:34 <Zakim> +AlexPassant; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexPassant; got it ←
14:16:36 <pgearon> pgearon: the outcome of the workshop is that there will likely be a new RDF working group
Paul Gearon: the outcome of the workshop is that there will likely be a new RDF working group ←
14:16:49 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:16:49 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:17:24 <bglimm> Zakim, who is on the phone?
Birte Glimm: Zakim, who is on the phone? ←
14:17:24 <Zakim> On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF, NicholasH, AlexPassant, Souri, bglimm (muted)
Zakim IRC Bot: On the phone I see pgearon, OlivierCorby, kasei, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji (muted), LeeF, NicholasH, AlexPassant, Souri, bglimm (muted) ←
14:17:25 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: asking everyone on the list about comments
Axel Polleres: asking everyone on the list about comments ←
14:17:38 <bglimm> Zakim, unmute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:17:38 <Zakim> bglimm should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should no longer be muted ←
14:18:11 <chimezie> Zakim, unmute me
Chimezie Ogbuji: Zakim, unmute me ←
14:18:11 <Zakim> Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: Chimezie_Ogbuji should no longer be muted ←
14:18:41 <pgearon> EF-1, EF-2, EF-3. Birte responded, and there was no response. Is this acceptable or do we need to follow up?
EF-1, EF-2, EF-3. Birte responded, and there was no response. Is this acceptable or do we need to follow up? ←
14:19:13 <pgearon> LeeF: good practice to follow up, but not required to at this stage (not until Last Call)
Lee Feigenbaum: good practice to follow up, but not required to at this stage (not until Last Call) ←
14:19:41 <AxelPolleres> LeeF: suggestion to track comments beyond sending response only by last call with a standard question for acknowledgement.
Lee Feigenbaum: suggestion to track comments beyond sending response only by last call with a standard question for acknowledgement. [ Scribe Assist by Axel Polleres ] ←
14:19:54 <bglimm> Zakim, mute me
Birte Glimm: Zakim, mute me ←
14:19:54 <Zakim> bglimm should now be muted
Zakim IRC Bot: bglimm should now be muted ←
14:20:26 <pgearon> JC-1. LeeF has sent another email opening this discussion again
JC-1. LeeF has sent another email opening this discussion again ←
14:20:49 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can this be closed, or left open?
Axel Polleres: can this be closed, or left open? ←
14:20:54 <pgearon> LeeF: leave open
Lee Feigenbaum: leave open ←
14:21:03 <AxelPolleres> ASSIGNMENT to be put on next TC agenda
Axel Polleres: ASSIGNMENT to be put on next TC agenda ←
14:21:18 <kasei> RV-2 is waiting on a second response from SteveH.
Gregory Williams: RV-2 is waiting on a second response from SteveH. ←
14:21:22 <pgearon> HK-1. Similar to JC-1
HK-1. Similar to JC-1 ←
14:21:46 <kasei> oops. jumped ahead a bit on that. sorry.
Gregory Williams: oops. jumped ahead a bit on that. sorry. ←
14:24:23 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Paul to check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table.
ACTION: Paul to check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table. ←
14:24:23 <trackbot> Created ACTION-259 - Check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-259 - Check whether http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jan/0003.html is fully answered and complete update the comments table. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:24:25 <pgearon> RN-1. Response was not formal, but in public. Richard Newman was satisfied with response
RN-1. Response was not formal, but in public. Richard Newman was satisfied with response ←
14:25:23 <pgearon> DR-1. Property Paths question still open. Axel with follow up with Andy to see if it is resolved
DR-1. Property Paths question still open. Axel with follow up with Andy to see if it is resolved ←
14:25:27 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to contact Andy about open comments assigned to him
ACTION: Axel to contact Andy about open comments assigned to him ←
14:25:27 <trackbot> Created ACTION-260 - Contact Andy about open comments assigned to him [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-260 - Contact Andy about open comments assigned to him [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:25:58 <kasei> RV-2 isn't actually done, despite what the wiki says.
Gregory Williams: RV-2 isn't actually done, despite what the wiki says. ←
14:26:02 <AxelPolleres> ST-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html
Axel Polleres: ST-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html ←
14:26:29 <pgearon> ST-1. This has not been responded to. pgearon to follow up
ST-1. This has not been responded to. pgearon to follow up ←
14:26:31 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Paul to look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly
ACTION: Paul to look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly ←
14:26:31 <trackbot> Created ACTION-261 - Look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-261 - Look into http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Feb/0015.html and update comments page accordingly [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:27:49 <pgearon> RV-2. Responded to, but followup mail not in table
RV-2. Responded to, but followup mail not in table ←
14:28:41 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: greg to add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table
ACTION: greg to add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table ←
14:28:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-262 - Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-262 - Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:28:45 <bglimm> Steve did send regrets (most likely cannot make it he said)
Birte Glimm: Steve did send regrets (most likely cannot make it he said) ←
14:29:26 <kasei> that's different
Gregory Williams: that's different ←
14:29:33 <pgearon> Steve needed for RV-3 and RV-4
Steve needed for RV-3 and RV-4 ←
14:29:54 <kasei> aha. RV-4 is the same as the followup on RV-1
Gregory Williams: aha. RV-4 is the same as the followup on RV-1 ←
14:30:10 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: ask stefve about RV-3 RV-4 responses
ACTION: ask stefve about RV-3 RV-4 responses ←
14:30:10 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - ask
Trackbot IRC Bot: Sorry, couldn't find user - ask ←
14:30:44 <AxelPolleres> close ACTION-262
Axel Polleres: close ACTION-262 ←
14:30:44 <trackbot> ACTION-262 Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table closed
Trackbot IRC Bot: ACTION-262 Add http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0002.html as new comment in the table, note necessary input from steve in the table closed ←
14:31:24 <AxelPolleres> RH-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html
Axel Polleres: RH-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Mar/0009.html ←
14:32:04 <pgearon> RH-1. More complex. This is an input paper which proposes an abstract syntax for Update
RH-1. More complex. This is an input paper which proposes an abstract syntax for Update ←
14:32:25 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 ←
14:32:46 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: not responded, but have a reply draft. Draft says that we may consider this
Axel Polleres: not responded, but have a reply draft. Draft says that we may consider this ←
14:34:52 <Zakim> -AlexPassant
Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexPassant ←
14:35:03 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: Lee wanted to hold off on the reply
Axel Polleres: Lee wanted to hold off on the reply ←
14:35:25 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
Zakim IRC Bot: +[IPcaller] ←
14:35:27 <AlexPassant> Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
Alexandre Passant: Zakim, [IPcaller] is me ←
14:35:27 <Zakim> +AlexPassant; got it
Zakim IRC Bot: +AlexPassant; got it ←
14:37:22 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: paul to reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list.
ACTION: paul to reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list. ←
14:37:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-263 - Reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-263 - Reformulate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RH-1 and send to the list. [on Paul Gearon - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:37:34 <pgearon> pgearon: feels that the draft response is a "brush off" and volunteers to update the response
Paul Gearon: feels that the draft response is a "brush off" and volunteers to update the response ←
14:39:21 <pgearon> KK-1. ISSUE-49. Ivan asked, said we can reference informatively
KK-1. ISSUE-49. Ivan asked, said we can reference informatively ←
14:40:04 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can replicate ISSUE-49 in the text and explain that there may be an issue if not used as expected
Axel Polleres: can replicate ISSUE-49 in the text and explain that there may be an issue if not used as expected ←
14:40:48 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Chime to draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc.
ACTION: Chime to draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc. ←
14:40:48 <trackbot> Created ACTION-264 - Draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc. [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-264 - Draft response to KK-1 summarising our internal discussions and changes in the doc. [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:41:12 <kasei> I drafted a response, but never got WG feedback on it.
Gregory Williams: I drafted a response, but never got WG feedback on it. ←
14:41:54 <pgearon> kasei: discussing MH-3, TI-3 response
Gregory Williams: discussing MH-3, TI-3 response ←
14:42:13 <pgearon> s/MH-3/MH-1/
s/MH-3/MH-1/ ←
14:42:25 <LeeF> +1 chimezie
Lee Feigenbaum: +1 chimezie ←
14:43:10 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MH-1
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MH-1 ←
14:43:12 <bglimm> +1
Birte Glimm: +1 ←
14:43:23 <pgearon> kasei: don't plan to follow up with "well known" endpoint without a concrete proposal
Gregory Williams: don't plan to follow up with "well known" endpoint without a concrete proposal ←
14:43:23 <bglimm> supoort
Birte Glimm: supoort ←
14:43:30 <bglimm> support
Birte Glimm: support ←
14:43:54 <kasei> either way
Gregory Williams: either way ←
14:44:16 <pgearon> kasei to follow up without action
kasei to follow up without action ←
14:44:39 <AxelPolleres> PA-1
Axel Polleres: PA-1 ←
14:44:40 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0002.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0002.html ←
14:45:15 <pgearon> Andy suggested that functions from XPath can be used
Andy suggested that functions from XPath can be used ←
14:45:22 <AxelPolleres> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PA-1
Axel Polleres: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PA-1 ←
14:45:58 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: can someone please check. Concern about syntactic correctness
Axel Polleres: can someone please check. Concern about syntactic correctness ←
14:46:36 <pgearon> AxelPolleres: noticed use of "+" instead of concat function
Axel Polleres: noticed use of "+" instead of concat function ←
14:47:03 <kasei> works in a real implementation?
Gregory Williams: works in a real implementation? ←
14:47:09 <kasei> does anybody implement those functions yet?
Gregory Williams: does anybody implement those functions yet? ←
14:47:17 <LeeF> my main concern is fn:concat and fn:encode-for-uri
Lee Feigenbaum: my main concern is fn:concat and fn:encode-for-uri ←
14:47:20 <LeeF> which we haven't settled on yet, right?
Lee Feigenbaum: which we haven't settled on yet, right? ←
14:47:43 <LeeF> which functions & via which URIs
Lee Feigenbaum: which functions & via which URIs ←
14:47:53 <LeeF> Sure
Lee Feigenbaum: Sure ←
14:48:16 <LeeF> i think you're missing braces in the WHERE clause
Lee Feigenbaum: i think you're missing braces in the WHERE clause ←
14:48:35 <LeeF> the sub-SELECT needs to be wrapped in braces
Lee Feigenbaum: the sub-SELECT needs to be wrapped in braces ←
14:49:22 <pgearon> pgearon: also includes example:percentEncode in query, which shouldn't be there
Paul Gearon: also includes example:percentEncode in query, which shouldn't be there ←
14:49:36 <kasei> I think the current grammar allows WHERE { SELECT ... }
Gregory Williams: I think the current grammar allows WHERE { SELECT ... } ←
14:50:33 <OlivierCorby> it should be: select exp as var (instead of var as exp)
Olivier Corby: it should be: select exp as var (instead of var as exp) ←
14:50:38 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change
ACTION: Axel to update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change ←
14:50:38 <trackbot> Created ACTION-265 - Update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-265 - Update answer to PA-1 explaining non-normative nature of the functions and that syntax may still change [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:51:52 <kasei> yes
Gregory Williams: yes ←
14:52:25 <pgearon> PA-2. Semantics of Describe. AxelPolleres has this on his list
PA-2. Semantics of Describe. AxelPolleres has this on his list ←
14:52:42 <kasei> I can draft a response to PA-2 w.r.t. service descriptions.
Gregory Williams: I can draft a response to PA-2 w.r.t. service descriptions. ←
14:53:56 <AxelPolleres> DS-1 needs discussion
Axel Polleres: DS-1 needs discussion ←
14:53:59 <AxelPolleres> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0011.html
Axel Polleres: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Jun/0011.html ←
14:54:03 <pgearon> DS-1. mentioned before, and kasei thinks we need more discussion
DS-1. mentioned before, and kasei thinks we need more discussion ←
14:54:44 <pgearon> kasei: Andy provided compelling example, response suggested that entailment can interact and cause problems
Gregory Williams: Andy provided compelling example, response suggested that entailment can interact and cause problems ←
14:54:59 <AxelPolleres> we had that discussion on F2F ... looks like we have to discuss this in the group again.
Axel Polleres: we had that discussion on F2F ... looks like we have to discuss this in the group again. ←
14:55:48 <AxelPolleres> ACTION: greg to write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options
ACTION: greg to write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options ←
14:55:49 <trackbot> Created ACTION-266 - Write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06].
Trackbot IRC Bot: Created ACTION-266 - Write a mail to the list on the issue of DS-1 and what are the options [on Gregory Williams - due 2010-07-06]. ←
14:55:59 <pgearon> kasei following up, will be discussed in next teleconference
kasei following up, will be discussed in next teleconference ←
14:57:09 <kasei> what time is the call tomorrow?
Gregory Williams: what time is the call tomorrow? ←
14:58:24 <AxelPolleres> topic: aob
14:58:35 <Zakim> -Chimezie_Ogbuji
Zakim IRC Bot: -Chimezie_Ogbuji ←
14:58:36 <AxelPolleres> adjourned
Axel Polleres: adjourned ←
14:58:37 <Zakim> -LeeF
Zakim IRC Bot: -LeeF ←
14:58:38 <pgearon> adjourned
adjourned ←
14:58:39 <Zakim> -bglimm
Zakim IRC Bot: -bglimm ←
14:58:45 <Zakim> -MattPerry
Zakim IRC Bot: -MattPerry ←
14:58:47 <Zakim> -AlexPassant
Zakim IRC Bot: -AlexPassant ←
14:58:49 <Zakim> -OlivierCorby
Zakim IRC Bot: -OlivierCorby ←
14:58:53 <Zakim> -NicholasH
Zakim IRC Bot: -NicholasH ←
14:58:55 <Zakim> -pgearon
Zakim IRC Bot: -pgearon ←
14:58:55 <AxelPolleres> rrsagent, make records public
Axel Polleres: rrsagent, make records public ←
14:58:57 <Zakim> -kasei
Zakim IRC Bot: -kasei ←
14:59:01 <Zakim> -AxelPolleres
Zakim IRC Bot: -AxelPolleres ←
15:22:59 <kasei> AxelPolleres, ping?
(No events recorded for 23 minutes)
Gregory Williams: AxelPolleres, ping? ←
15:35:01 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, Souri, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
(No events recorded for 12 minutes)
Zakim IRC Bot: disconnecting the lone participant, Souri, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM ←
15:35:05 <Zakim> SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
Zakim IRC Bot: SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended ←
15:35:07 <Zakim> Attendees were OlivierCorby, pgearon, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji, +1.617.553.aacc, LeeF, bglimm, NicholasH, +1.603.897.aaee,
Zakim IRC Bot: Attendees were OlivierCorby, pgearon, +44.186.528.aaaa, kasei, +1.603.897.aabb, MattPerry, AxelPolleres, Chimezie_Ogbuji, +1.617.553.aacc, LeeF, bglimm, NicholasH, +1.603.897.aaee, ←
15:35:09 <Zakim> ... Souri, AlexPassant
Zakim IRC Bot: ... Souri, AlexPassant ←
Formatted by CommonScribe
This revision (#1) generated 2010-06-30 15:50:08 UTC by 'apollere2', comments: None