W3C

BAD TF

14 Oct 2009

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Shadi, Wilco, Eric, Michael
Regrets
Chair
Shadi
Scribe
Shadi

Contents


Demo Navigation

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2009Oct/0026.html

http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/index.html

http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/evaluation-home.html

http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/overview.html

http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/accessible-home.html

http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/evaluation-home.html

Wilco: don't like the 4 cells under the tabs

Eric: background bar will be red for inaccessible pages

Shadi: agree, dislike the 4 cells but love the overview tab

Michael: indicator should be in a different style
... navigation should be more identifyable as a sub-menu
... screen shot is a good idea but should be just one link
... maybe add "inaccessible *page*"

Eric: makes link texts long

Michael: show annotation on it's own

Wilco: maybe do something with the whole accessible/inaccessible thing
... how about we use the heading of the page - do something with "BAD"
... add links and have two completely mirrored sites
... possibly share an overview page

Michael: generally agree with the general idea for the wording

Shadi: maybe re-introduce the "to accessible/inaccessible version" button
... and have "demo page" and "report" under the tabs

Wilco: maybe keep the sites more seperate

Eric: was the request to allow switching back and forth

Michael: yes, switching is an important issue

Wilco: could switch from the page you're on, just from the header

Shadi: why was the "to accessible/inaccessible" removed?

Eric: can only move between the version of the same types of pages
... the sub-menu allows moving from report to demo page etc

Michael: like the current concept, maybe just fiddle around with the style a little

Eric: could have "accessible [page] [report]" to better clarify the targets

Michael: sub-navigation moves with the corresponding tab?

Eric: yes

Wilco: no "show annotations" button on the report page

Michael: or disabled

Wilco: white on green doesn't have sufficient contrast

<eric> http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/evaluation-home.html

Shadi: need W3C/WAI logos

Michael: needs to be on the left?

Shadi: can be on the right too

Reports Design

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2009Oct/0023.html

http://fiers.name/badtf/report/report.htm

Michael: may need a title element in the results to clarify what X/Y means
... don't like title elements that much but may help clarify

Wilco: can do

Michael: was suggestion for splitting the table into 4?

Wilco: decided that we can't do that
... added headings for the principles

Michael: maybe also add title attributes to the principle, guidelines, and success criteria

Wilco: not sure if it adds much

Shadi: ok to remove links from the principles?

Wilco: yes

Shadi: other comments on scanning the table?

Wilco: maybe highlight the level number
... maybe by using color

Michael: might clutter the page

Wilco: maybe just a subtle color

Next Meetings

Next meeting: Wednesday 28 October

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2009/10/14 16:55:07 $