See also: IRC log
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2009Oct/0026.html
http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/index.html
http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/evaluation-home.html
http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/overview.html
http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/accessible-home.html
http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/v2/evaluation-home.html
Wilco: don't like the 4 cells under the tabs
Eric: background bar will be red for inaccessible pages
Shadi: agree, dislike the 4 cells but love the overview tab
Michael: indicator should be in a different
style
... navigation should be more identifyable as a sub-menu
... screen shot is a good idea but should be just one link
... maybe add "inaccessible *page*"
Eric: makes link texts long
Michael: show annotation on it's own
Wilco: maybe do something with the whole
accessible/inaccessible thing
... how about we use the heading of the page - do something with "BAD"
... add links and have two completely mirrored sites
... possibly share an overview page
Michael: generally agree with the general idea for the wording
Shadi: maybe re-introduce the "to
accessible/inaccessible version" button
... and have "demo page" and "report" under the tabs
Wilco: maybe keep the sites more seperate
Eric: was the request to allow switching back and forth
Michael: yes, switching is an important issue
Wilco: could switch from the page you're on, just from the header
Shadi: why was the "to accessible/inaccessible" removed?
Eric: can only move between the version of the
same types of pages
... the sub-menu allows moving from report to demo page etc
Michael: like the current concept, maybe just fiddle around with the style a little
Eric: could have "accessible [page] [report]" to better clarify the targets
Michael: sub-navigation moves with the corresponding tab?
Eric: yes
Wilco: no "show annotations" button on the report page
Michael: or disabled
Wilco: white on green doesn't have sufficient contrast
<eric> http://bad.ericeggert.net/meta-pages/evaluation-home.html
Shadi: need W3C/WAI logos
Michael: needs to be on the left?
Shadi: can be on the right too
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2009Oct/0023.html
http://fiers.name/badtf/report/report.htm
Michael: may need a title element in the results
to clarify what X/Y means
... don't like title elements that much but may help clarify
Wilco: can do
Michael: was suggestion for splitting the table into 4?
Wilco: decided that we can't do that
... added headings for the principles
Michael: maybe also add title attributes to the principle, guidelines, and success criteria
Wilco: not sure if it adds much
Shadi: ok to remove links from the principles?
Wilco: yes
Shadi: other comments on scanning the table?
Wilco: maybe highlight the level number
... maybe by using color
Michael: might clutter the page
Wilco: maybe just a subtle color
Next meeting: Wednesday 28 October