See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 30 September 2009
Cahri: Steven
<scribe> Scribe: Steven
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml11-20090916/xhtml11.html#strict
Steven: I see an issue still
<ShaneM> Let's not forget about @name on img and form. If we plan to reintroduce those we need to PER M12N first I think...
Steven: So DOCTYPE is now
required again, so @version isn't so needed anymore
... so do we make it a SHOULD, a MAY, or delete it?
Tina: I'd like to see a bridge to XHTML2 here
Steven: The problem is that XHTML2 is not describabl;e with DTDs
Tina: Can't we use the DOCTYPE just as an identifier?
Shane: Not really
... So should @version be a SHOULD or MAY?
Steven: MAY is good enough to provide the bridge
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2009/ED-xhtml-basic-20090916/xhtml-basic-rec-diff.html#s_xhtmlmodules
"When this attribute and the ↑↑ xml:lang ↑↑ are"
PROPOSAL: The WG resolves to send these three WDs to PER, once that M12N has been reissued to resolve the remaining issues in that.
Steven: In favour?
<mgylling> +1
+1
<Tina> +1
<ShaneM> +1
RESOLUTION: To send the current three specs to PER once M12N has been reissued
Shane: Bjoern may have mentioned
things that are not in the tracker, because they've never been
reported
... some issues are old
... the issue on usemap and its datatype is one we need to get
out
<ShaneM> @class and its datatype
<ShaneM> @name on img and form
<ShaneM> @profile is defined as URIs - a space separated list of URIs
<ShaneM> happy to produce RNG as a note. it is basically complete.
Steven: I think that one of the implementations of @profile is wrong
Shane: Ah. I'll fix it right now
Steven: The problem is that class should be able to be empty
Shane: Exactly
Steven: So we just agree with this comment right?
Shane: Checking... these are all there
Steven: So this is just an issue that we forgot to close
Shane: Yes
Steven: Hereby closed
Shane: I think we decided not to do this
<ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_legacymodule
Steven: Is legacy only elements,. or also attributes?
Shane: No also some attributes
Steven: Nice suggestion, but this
is a PER.
... but there is always M12Nv2
Shane: Right
... We missed these out, they aren't anywhere else
Steven: Oh! Then that's
different
... then we should fix it
SHane: OK
... Any objections?
{none]
<ShaneM> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstract_modules.html#s_bdomodule
Shane: He's right, dir is not required
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/imagemap/results
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/imagemap/
<mgylling> http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/map.html
Shane: What does HTML5 do?
Steven: #name
... So what type do we use? CDATA with a restriction, or a URI
reference with a restriction?
Markus: It is a URI, so the URI with a restriction would be the proper thing to do
Steven: Same thing
Shane: I'm going to call it a fragment reference, from the URI spec
Shane: A non-issue
... already supported
Shane: Already dealt with
Steven: Done!
... Good work
Shane: I will update M12N
today
... and post an email to say I've done it
[ADJOURN]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Dor/D or/ Succeeded: s/PR/PER/ Succeeded: s/TO/To/ Succeeded: s/oen/one/ Succeeded: s/tn/nt/ Succeeded: s/TH/Th/ Succeeded: s/rp/pr/ Succeeded: s/tINA: i'D LIKE TO SEE A BRIDGE TO xhtml2 HERE/Tina: I'd like to see a bridge to XHTML2 here/ Succeeded: s/current there/current three/ Succeeded: s/ANy/Any/ Succeeded: s/referehnce/reference/ Found Scribe: Steven Inferring ScribeNick: Steven Default Present: ShaneM, +1.617.588.aaaa, Tina, Steven, mgylling Present: ShaneM +1.617.588.aaaa Tina Steven mgylling Regrets: MoZ Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2009Sep/0024 Found Date: 30 Sep 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-xhtml-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]