See also: IRC log
<scribe> ACTION: comment #40 - pending until all annotations are populated [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-badtf-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: comment #41 - send clarification messages [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-badtf-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: comment #42 - michael will check for possible fixes [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-badtf-minutes.html#action03]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/news/
<scribe> ACTION: comment #43 - information is in the alt-attribute [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/08/19-badtf-minutes.html#action04]
[#43: issue - ideally we would have data in tabular format, but we don't want people to assume that this is needed for all images]
<maik_w> http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/news/
[#43: suggestion - add information that there are different solutions in the annotations]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/comments
<Wilco> http://fiers.name/badtf/report/report.htm
Tom: folding and unfolding works well
Michael: maybe indenting will make it clearer
... also put folding options on the left hand side
... common anology
Wilco: looked really bad and made it more
confusing
... and indenting also makes more complicated
... and takes away width
http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/report
Michael: +/- works well but should be bigger
Wilco: worried that it becomes more complex
... especially the width of the table
Tom: when one "expands" text the style changes
... is confusing
Wilco: will look into it
Tom: term "sufficient techniques" is misleading for failures
Shadi: "expand" is unclear
Eric: maybe "full description"
Tom: or "show/hide full description"
Michael: prefer +/- icons rather than arrows
... should look at examples
<eric> http://www.everaldo.com/crystal/
Wilco: should columns have fixed width?
Tom: bothered me
Michael+Eric: should be fixed
<eric> More icon inspiration at wikimedia commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Icons
next meeting: Wednesday 2 September