See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 18 August 2009
<Bob> zakim aacc is Sreed
<dug> Ashok - your pretty tough!
<dug> Bob is looking to cause more divorces
<fmaciel> do you see that?
<dug> I think Ram just asked to scribe :-)
<Bob> scribe: Paul Nolan
<Bob> scribenick: PaulN
Agenda is accepted
RESOLUTION: All three sets of minutes from F2F are accepted
Bob: need chair for 8th Sept - Yves?
<dug> you skipped a few topics
Bob: Yves will let group know if he can not make it.
Yves: Partial put will be done by end Aygust
Bob: 6724 Doug will complete 28th August
Bob has reviewed the expected completion dats of outstanding issues
<dug> I've fixed ALL of the typos that Ram noticed.
Paul will post details for travel
<dug> do people prefer WS-Fragment or WS-Fragments ?
<Yves> WS-Fragment
<Bob> +1 Yves
<Wu> +1
Bob: "WS-Fragment" will be used
Ram: more time requested
<Bob> for MEX and RT
Doug: can people please review
Bob: should we accept the spec
and raise issues for open questions?
... next week we will review this proposed draft
Bob: no objections to opening new issue 7235
<dug> Unless otherwise noted, all URIs are absolute URIs and URI comparison MUST be
<dug> performed according to [RFC 3986] section 6.2.1.
Doug: new issue 7270. Specs consistency issue
Bob: new issue accepted
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Aug/0033.html
Bob: we need to resolve an important question before going too far
Ashok: reviewed two points he has raised
wu: should only EP related policies will be attached inside the EPR
Ashok: only EPR related policies should be attached in the proposed way
wu: to clarify. we will define a
namespace?
... one namespace fo all specs?
<dug> +1 one NS per spec
<Yves> +1
<gpilz> +1
<Wu> +1 Bob
Bob: should we do one namespace
per spec?
... do we more or less agree on the proposed direction?
<Wu> Bob's point as I understand (agree) is to have one policy namespace per spec for ease maintenance.
<Ashok> I think that would be fine
Bob: are we agreed on direction?
no moved up a fe lines
<dug> In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension, implementers are encouraged to add a corresponding extension to the response message.
<dug> (that's Gil's text)
<dug> Ram's text: In cases where it is either desirable or necessary for the receiver of a request that has been extended to indicate that it has recognized and accepted the semantics associated with that extension, it is recommended that the receiver add a corresponding extension to the response message. The definition of an extension should clearly specify how the extension that appears in the...
<dug> ...response correlates with that in the corresponding request.
Gpilz: reviewed proposal
Doug: is this issue specific to just the one spec?
Gpilz: All specs affected
no objections to proposal
7206 will be extended to all specs
RESOLUTION: proposal accepted
<dug> +1 to cwna
<gpilz> +1 to cwna
Gpilz: complexity is dealt with by explicity stating cobinations of extensions that are supported.
Wu: how do we advertise these extensions?
Gpilz: each new extension defines itself
Wu: should we use Policy?
... should we use WSDL to advertise?
Bob: notes that WS-Policy should be used for extensions
RESOLUTION: no action
<Ram> -Issue-7160 Eventing:check 2119 terms http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7160 -Davis
RESOLUTION: as proposed
RESOLUTION: as proposed
RESOLUTION: as proposed
RESOLUTION: as proposed
RESOLUTION: as proposed
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/plese/please/ Succeeded: s/no/no moved up a fe lines/ Succeeded: s/??/60/ Found Scribe: Paul Nolan Found ScribeNick: PaulN Default Present: +25625660aaaa, Doug_Davis, PaulN, Bob_Freund, +984999aabb, Tom_Rutt, +1.408.970.aacc, +984999aadd, fmaciel, Wu_Chou, Vikas, Sreed, Yves, Ashok_Malhotra, +1.408.642.aaee, [Microsoft], Mark_Little, gpilz Present: +25625660aaaa Doug_Davis PaulN Bob_Freund +984999aabb Tom_Rutt +1.408.970.aacc +984999aadd fmaciel Wu_Chou Vikas Sreed Yves Ashok_Malhotra +1.408.642.aaee [Microsoft] Mark_Little gpilz Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Aug/0037.html Found Date: 18 Aug 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/08/18-ws-ra-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]