See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 11 August 2009
<scribe> Scribe: mphillip
Minutes of last call: http://www.w3.org/2009/08/04-soap-jms-minutes.html
No objections
2 additional issues raised since the agenda was posted
No other comments on agenda
Actions: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
Derek: No progress on action 68
Eric: Proposal submitted for #91
close action-91
<trackbot> ACTION-91 Propose a change to Spec. wording to remedy inconsistency in MIME example vs. Protocol-2029 assertion closed
Eric: No progress on actions 93 and 97
Phil: Have posted changes for issues related to actions 100 and 101
close action-100
<trackbot> ACTION-100 Apply Issue-7 resolution to spec CVS commit is acceptable closed
close action-101
Eric: No response from Dongbo (Oracle) or Progress)
<eric> Raised issues: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/raised
<eric> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/9
Phil: Issues 1-7 discussed last
week and normative wording agreed for faults
... Some of the wording in the spec. is still inconsistent with
the newly agreed wording
... In issue 9 - propose editorial change to standardise the
wording of fault descriptions
<trackbot> ACTION-101 Apply 1,2,3,5,6 issue resolutions to spec CVS commit is acceptable closed
No objections to opening this issue
<eric> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/10
RESOLUTION: Open Issue 9
<eric> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604/#Protocol-2016
Phil: Issue 10 describes two assertions (2016 and 2017) which should be collapsed into one (section 2.2.3)
All agree to open issue-10
<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0003.html
<Phil> latest copy of binding spec: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
RESOLUTION: All accept that Eric's proposal resolves this issue
Action Phil to update the spec with Eric's proposal for issue 8
<trackbot> Created ACTION-102 - Update the spec with Eric's proposal for issue 8 [on Phil Adams - due 2009-08-18].
Issue-1 -
<eric> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0007.html
Discussion about overcoming problem that a termdef element is not allowed in an assertion in the SpecXML document
Eric: Could cross-reference to the assertion later in section 2.8 (instead of to the term)
<Phil> "<p><termdef id="contentTypeMismatch" term="contentTypeMismatch"><assert class="document" id="Protocol-2012" cr-id="" preamble="(contentType)">
<Phil> If the <code>charset</code> parameter is specified, it is checked to ensure that it matches the encoding value from the supplied XML.
<Phil> A fault <rfc2119>MUST</rfc2119> be generated with subcode <term>contentTypeMismatch</term> if the encoding values do not match.</assert></termdef>
<Phil> </p>"
Phil: Propose the above solution - to put entire assert element inside termdef
<eric> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?rev=1.58&content-type=text/html&f=h
No objections to this
RESOLUTION: Accept the applied resolution of Issue-1
Issue 2:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/2
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0005.html
This is not consistent with the Issue-1 pattern
Action Phil to make the Issue-2 changes consistent with Issue-1
<trackbot> Created ACTION-103 - Make the Issue-2 changes consistent with Issue-1 [on Phil Adams - due 2009-08-18].
Issue 3
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/3
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0006.html
Assertion 2022 is also inconsistent with the style used for issue 1
Leave Issue 3 open for same corrections as Issue 2
Issue 5
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/5
RESOLUTION: All approve the application of resolution for Issue-5
Issue 6 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/6
Eric: Our accepted resolution of this also included removing JMSPriority from the table
Action Phil to reapply the resolution for issue 6 (remove JMS Priority)
<trackbot> Created ACTION-104 - reapply the resolution for issue 6 (remove JMS Priority) [on Phil Adams - due 2009-08-18].
Out of time...
12). AOB
mphillip: I will be out of the office for the next two weeks
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/progress/Progress/ Found Scribe: mphillip Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Actions Derek Phil Yves alewis eric joined mphillip soap-jms trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: Peter Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2009Aug/0010.html Found Date: 11 Aug 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/08/11-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]