See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 16 June 2009
<scribe> scribe: mphillip
Eric: TIBCO lawyers confirm that
everyone needs to agree to use the preferred IP terms :
trust200902
... That is still an action item for everyone on the list
... Roland's name and email address is still on the draft URI
scheme, we should pick someone else
Mark: Happy for this to be me
<scribe> ACTION: Mark to send contact details to Eric to update the URI scheme [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Mark
<trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. mhapner, mphillip)
<scribe> ACTION: mphillip to send contact details to Eric to update the URI scheme [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-88 - Send contact details to Eric to update the URI scheme [on Mark Phillips - due 2009-06-23].
Mark: IBM IETF rep suggested that we could submit with the pre5378Trust2009-02-stripped terms to keep an active draft, but update with trust200902 when we have agreement
Eric: OK propose if we haven't agreed by next week, we will submit with the old pre5378trust terms and continue to work to get agreement
Derek: Will contact legal dept. to try to get approval for trust200902
Phil: Axis2 have no plans to implement at the moment
Eric: So WebSphere is the only
know implementation we have at this stage
... We should all take an action item to get implementations
underway
... For TIBCO the question is not 'if' but 'when' but can't say
if this will be in the next release or not
Mark: For other IBM products the situation is similar
Eric: What does it mean to have two implementations to move to the next stage
Yves: Must show two interoperable
implementations
... Two implementations must talk to each other - and all tests
must be passed by two implementations
... Only for non-optional features
Eric: So we must nail down the
remainder of our test cases and then identify two
implementations which pass them
... Does anyone have time to contribute to the remaining test
cases? (Mainly around WSDL)
Phil: Will look at the test cases and ensure that we have coverage for the assertions.
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/
Action for Eric to review the test assertion IDs to see which ones we _really_ need to test
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - for
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to review the test assertion IDs to see which ones we _really_ need to test [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-89 - Review the test assertion IDs to see which ones we _really_ need to test [on Eric Johnson - due 2009-06-23].
http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/assertions/assertions.html
Phil: Ideally without changing the binding spec.
Eric: Yes, will be looking for assertions which duplicate other assertions. Removing duplicate assertions woould be editorial changes
no other business
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: mphillip Inferring ScribeNick: mphillip Default Present: Phil, Derek, mphillip, Eric, Yves, alewis Present: Phil Derek mphillip Eric Yves alewis Regrets: Peter Found Date: 16 Jun 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/16-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: eric mark mphillip WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]